AT900T vs. MX-JJS stiffness

Discussion in 'Racket Recommendation / Comparison' started by phaaam, Oct 19, 2013.

  1. phaaam

    phaaam Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2008
    Messages:
    415
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Canada
    I've had a lot of success with my AT900T lately and I was thinking of grabbing a MX JJS. Just wondering what people thought of the stiffness between these two rackets. Thanks!
     
  2. santhoshbhoopal

    santhoshbhoopal Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2009
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    canada
    the feeling is very different.
     
  3. chocoboc

    chocoboc Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2010
    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Vancouver
    Agree with santhoshbhoopal. I have a JJS and tested my friend's AT900T many months ago in one double game, and I just cannot get anything out of AT900T (except defend is slightly faster). Of course that was just one game, but if you want to switch between these two rackets, it might take some time to adjust to it.
     
  4. phaaam

    phaaam Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2008
    Messages:
    415
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Canada
    Ah I see thanks. I just enjoy testing new rackets to find my "perfect" racket. I already found the string I'd like to use. If AT900T is better, I'd keep it instead and vice versa.

    I was just wondering how it compared in terms of stiffness since then I can gauge whether I can even begin playing with JJS. If it's stiffer than AT900 then that might be an issue.
     
  5. visor

    visor Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    16,402
    Likes Received:
    2,001
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    Haven't you already settled on the XP70 as your perfect racket? :p
     
  6. chocoboc

    chocoboc Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2010
    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Vancouver
    In that one game, I found AT900T stiffer than my JJS.
     
  7. phaaam

    phaaam Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2008
    Messages:
    415
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Canada
    It's close, but it's not quite there yet. The head weight is 2-3g lighter than what I'd want ideally lol. I think I measured 41g. My AT900T is 43-44g =D

    Thanks, that'll make a difference in my decision that's for sure haha.

    Now to decide whether I want the Arc11 as well...or even the BSLYD-N
     
  8. visor

    visor Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    16,402
    Likes Received:
    2,001
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    With that much head wt, you should be looking at 3u VTZF!
     

Share This Page