User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 17 of 27
  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    germany
    Posts
    72
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default why can't they make a plastric shuttle that flies like feather?

    Wouldn't modern technology allow to create a plastic shuttle that almost exactly flies like like feather? I also wonder why nylons always have the same "parachute" and not some kind of artifical feathers that resemble real feathers more closely. wouldn't it be possible to create exactly the same drag as real feathers if you use good engeneering?

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    821
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The Mavis 2000 is as close as it comes.

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    US
    Posts
    326
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    With all the R&D at Yonex, I'm sure if anyone can, it would be them. Perhaps it's a conspiracy. If Yonex can produce a hybrid nylon that can "match" the feathers closer than current ones, the feather market would take a big hit. It doesn't even have to last as long as the current Mavis nylons, just longer than feathers, could have a life in between feathers and current nylons. Yonex is smart, the money is in the mark up of rackets, just keep introducing new models.

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    germany
    Posts
    72
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mater View Post
    With all the R&D at Yonex, I'm sure if anyone can, it would be them. Perhaps it's a conspiracy. If Yonex can produce a hybrid nylon that can "match" the feathers closer than current ones, the feather market would take a big hit. It doesn't even have to last as long as the current Mavis nylons, just longer than feathers, could have a life in between feathers and current nylons. Yonex is smart, the money is in the mark up of rackets, just keep introducing new models.
    that makes sense. maybe they could also use something to coat or fill the feathers making them more durable.

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,857
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    This subject has been discussed before in various threads.

    The short answer is that there have been innovative plastic skirt designs from various companies. None has taken hold with the badminton public.
    Also, there have been shuttles with individual synthetic "feathers". But apparently it was very expensive.

    The question remains: Is the inability to create a feather-like plastic shuttle because of the miraculous but ineffable qualities of organic feathers? Or is the physics do-able but just too expensive?

    Now that the exisitence of the Higgs Bosun has been confirmed, there must be a few geniuses with time on their hands to figure this out.

  6. #6
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    35,915
    Mentioned
    52 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    there is a big difference in whether one can do it, and whether it would be cost effective.

    i agree with you, with modern material technology, carbon fiber, carbon nanotube, etc, there bound to be material that are strong enough to beat natural bird feather. however, goose/duck feathers are surprising strong material when you measure strength/weight ratio, and even more surprising when you measure strength/cost ratio as well.

    i believe someone is able to duplicate the strength/weight ratio, as well as strength to cost ratio, but i doubt anyone has managed to duplicate both at the same time.

    and ultimately, to be successful, the invention will have to beat feathers in terms of cost/durability.

    i today i doubt such a material exist.

  7. #7
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    9,211
    Mentioned
    97 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    I say forget plastic...they'll just clog our oceans when we have to dispose of them eventually...

    The environmentally friendly option (and carnivorous too ) would be to continue with feathers as they're much more easily biodegradeable.

    Not to mention they feel infinitely better...
    Last edited by visor; 10-19-2013 at 07:50 PM.

  8. #8
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    35,915
    Mentioned
    52 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by visor View Post
    I say forget plastic...they'll just clog our oceans when we have to dispose of them eventually...

    The environmentally friendly option (and carnivorous too ) would be to continue with feathers as they're much more easily biodegradeable.

    Not to mention they feel infinitely better...
    that's a really good point!

  9. #9
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    US
    Posts
    326
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I agree, I love playing with feather but where I play, the group is exclusively nylon, so I try to play with the best nylon possible.

  10. #10
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    9,211
    Mentioned
    97 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Best nylon possible... Mavis 2000.

  11. #11
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    US
    Posts
    326
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yes, I agree, that's the one I always pull out to play. Of course we're all on BC and looking for that edge, so I'm constantly looking out for something better than the 2000.

  12. #12
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Vaughan, ON
    Posts
    427
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mater View Post
    I agree, I love playing with feather but where I play, the group is exclusively nylon, so I try to play with the best nylon possible.
    Omg that's the same with me. I want to use feathers, but I never get the chance. One time I was playing at my club and they only use plastics. So when I was able to get a singles court game with my buddy I toke out my feathers and some guy ask, "You like those?" in a very condescending tone. When the game started he just stood near the court and complained how the shuttle was slower or how it wouldn't last the match, etc. So annoying..

    Anyways back to the point of the thread. I also think it's a conspiracy :P
    They probably do have a method of producing nylon with feather flight but either it's expensive to produce or feathers are more profitable.

  13. #13
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    US
    Posts
    326
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Steve, that's terrible that he would say that about the feather shuttle. At our place, most if not all will agree feathers are the way to play but we have mixed skilled players so a feather will get hammered in the skirt if we play with them and it will get costly. Plus, we have members who have trouble picking up all white shuttles in the lights on clears and I've been asked to switch to yellow nylons even if I am holding a white nylon in my hand to start the game.

  14. #14
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Vaughan, ON
    Posts
    427
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I honestly don't know why he would go out of his way to complain, but hey, I'm not the one missing out

  15. #15
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    580
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I use both AS40/AS50 and Mavis 2000 every session our group play ... Mavis 2000 for warm-up and practise and AS40/50 for games ... all are Yonex's top-end in the respective categories and yes, there is a difference - not so much in terms of flight or mechanics but in terms of FEEL. When you hit the feather shuttle, the feedback through the racquet is totally different from plastic.

    However, haveing said that, I will say Mavis 2000 is about as good as AS30.

  16. #16
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    OutHere
    Posts
    22
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Have you heard of recycling plastic?

  17. #17
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Brunei Darussalam
    Posts
    1,638
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve the noob View Post
    Omg that's the same with me. I want to use feathers, but I never get the chance. One time I was playing at my club and they only use plastics. So when I was able to get a singles court game with my buddy I toke out my feathers and some guy ask, "You like those?" in a very condescending tone. When the game started he just stood near the court and complained how the shuttle was slower or how it wouldn't last the match, etc. So annoying..

    Anyways back to the point of the thread. I also think it's a conspiracy :P
    They probably do have a method of producing nylon with feather flight but either it's expensive to produce or feathers are more profitable.
    Shuttle is slow?? of course. No wonder some are so proud that they can smash faster with nylon (they must be thinking they have a powerful smash) but struggle in tournament using a feather.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •