User Tag List

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 18 to 34 of 49
  1. #18
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    951
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Strung multiple of these at 28lbs and haven't seen them break... yet.

    I personally broke one that was at 26lbs when I hit the ground trying to pick up a shuttle. My other one is still going strong after a year.

    The racket's fragile, but no where near what people are saying. Either that or Canada has a superior version of the racket, which is very not likely :P.

    As for the 35lbs challenge, I'd gladly take it if I was rich

  2. #19
    Regular Member Mark A's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    St Helens, UK
    Posts
    4,583
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kwun View Post
    maybe this is the only time we need to take Yonex's recommended tension (24lbs) seriously.
    Humour reps.

    In all seriousness, had I seen all these horror stories before I strung BJ's FB, I might not have done it at 30. I'm either lucky or good, it would seem.

    And no - I cannot believe that CM is using one of these. Ahsan neither.

  3. #20
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    puchong, malaysia
    Posts
    555
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    the racket makers need a wide range of product for mass market and at the same time need the pro to endorse them for marketing purpose. with that the FB, BS12, etc dual specs or repainting happen. I believe these 'con' cases are lesser among head heavier and stiffer products.

  4. #21
    Regular Member Mark A's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    St Helens, UK
    Posts
    4,583
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    While I think it's a bit dishonest for a pro to use a spray-up, I have to balance that with my opinon that if you buy a racket just because Pro X uses it, you deserve to be fooled!

  5. #22
    Regular Member demolidor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    @Hollanti
    Posts
    11,830
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vajrasattva View Post
    well.. that was what i thought so too.. the image is from all englands and it got me curious because i read this from a supposed authoritative and accurate source of information

    painting a zforce to mislead others, would suggest the questionability on the integrity of the company... yonex should clarify on this!
    Just to add something I just remembered: at the AE the FB was just released (transitioning period?). Another poster mentioned that one of the stringers during the WC said it was a regular FB, not a repainted ZF.

    Quote Originally Posted by steamboat View Post
    The stringer for Yonex at the 2013 World Championship has confirmed Mogensen and Ahsan are indeed using the Arc FB lightweight. He also mentioned that Mogensen are testing the stringer to their limit. Lightest racket>Arc FB, thinnest string>BG66UM and highest tension>34-36lbs. Not those 3U or paint job as speculated. Boe using the 4U VT80. He also attached some Yonex players' racket, string and tension at thread 246.

    http://bbs.badmintoncn.com/forum.php...C0%BD%F5%C8%FC

    If u understand Chinese.
    As far as tennis is concerned: they update their rackets much more often so it's more likely someone wouldn't want to change every new year. I suppose the changes are magnified compared to the lightweights badminton rackets are. And some special players will be allowed by their new sponsor to play with repainted different brand rackets, but not Yonex as we saw with Wozniacki .
    I read on tenniswarehouse that HEAD now has a disclaimer that what their pro's use might not necesarilly be what you can buy in the store. This after a lawsuit against Wilson apparently (have not looked that up) .
    Last edited by demolidor; 11-27-2013 at 05:53 AM.

  6. #23
    Regular Member demolidor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    @Hollanti
    Posts
    11,830
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Article on tennis paintjobs from 2004 http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/ten...ory?id=1872892

  7. #24
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Carboard box mansion
    Posts
    1,031
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jasonvan View Post
    I think there was a post somewhere where a member here(I think Paul Stewart if I remember correctly) asked a stringer about CM's racket during All England? I think and the stringer said his racket is definitely not a FB and a repainted ZForce...
    Not surprising...

    If a newest racquet came out, made a bit investment to make it, but no pros like using it... they're have to go through that route and repaint the racket.

    You can see the picture. It's too glossy to be a FB.

  8. #25
    Regular Member Mark A's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    St Helens, UK
    Posts
    4,583
    Mentioned
    24 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by demolidor View Post
    I read on tenniswarehouse that HEAD now has a disclaimer that what their pro's use might not necesarilly be what you can buy in the store.
    Yes, they do - the latest Tennisnuts catalogue has "HEAD Pro Players may play with different rackets from the model shown."

  9. #26
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    shingaporu
    Posts
    503
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by demolidor View Post
    Just to add something I just remembered: at the AE the FB was just released (transitioning period?). Another poster mentioned that one of the stringers during the WC said it was a regular FB, not a repainted ZF.
    ah.. you were a step ahead, i was about to quote that thread on badminton CN. i just happened to be rather active on badminton cn bbs board and i also read the thread where the stringer did mention about his experiences stringing for the pros, the tensions they wanted, how morgensen brought over 4 FBs 1 hour before the competition wanting it to be strung, posing quite a challenge as the FB was the lightest, and the requested string the thinnest (66UM), with the highest tension strung around 34-36lbs.

    the stringer also mentioned at the end how 6 point support could be seen to be really important in his stringing experience at the event.

  10. #27
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    shingaporu
    Posts
    503
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mark A View Post
    While I think it's a bit dishonest for a pro to use a spray-up, I have to balance that with my opinon that if you buy a racket just because Pro X uses it, you deserve to be fooled!
    hah! of course! whoever who buys racquet because some pro is using it should deserve to be fooled.

    i'm a more experiential person, so if there's something new or interesting i'll buy it and try it myself, ignoring whoever the heck is dissing it or who's using it etc. the FB's definitely something really fun to play with but it doesnt see much action nowadays as i've gone back up the spectrum to racquets around the 2U-U range.

    what i'm more interested in, is the claims of it being a repainted ZF. the evidence in pictures and stringers seem to point that the racquets in question is still a FB, not a ZF, yet there can be people whom are so sure on the ZF paint job

  11. #28
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    shingaporu
    Posts
    503
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Heong View Post
    Not surprising...

    If a newest racquet came out, made a bit investment to make it, but no pros like using it... they're have to go through that route and repaint the racket.

    You can see the picture. It's too glossy to be a FB.
    the matte finish of the FB's that reflective, especially the blue area! it is not glossy in the picture.


    hmm.. actually they should have spray painted it in NR-Zspeed color perhaps!

  12. #29
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    10,135
    Mentioned
    136 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vajrasattva View Post
    ah.. you were a step ahead, i was about to quote that thread on badminton CN. i just happened to be rather active on badminton cn bbs board and i also read the thread where the stringer did mention about his experiences stringing for the pros, the tensions they wanted, how morgensen brought over 4 FBs 1 hour before the competition wanting it to be strung, posing quite a challenge as the FB was the lightest, and the requested string the thinnest (66UM), with the highest tension strung around 34-36lbs.

    the stringer also mentioned at the end how 6 point support could be seen to be really important in his stringing experience at the event.
    The way Boe/Mo bowed out to Liu/Qiu in only their 2nd match at the 2013 AE, I would believe that Mo was indeed using the real FB at that time.

  13. #30
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Jakarta/Singapore/Sydney
    Posts
    418
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by visor View Post
    The way Boe/Mo bowed out to Liu/Qiu in only their 2nd match at the 2013 AE, I would believe that Mo was indeed using the real FB at that time.
    If it was the real Arc FB, then I think the next question will be "What was the spec ? Was it the 5U or F or something else ?"…. since we all know that manufacturing process of badminton rackets still partly hand-made, it would be so easy to do enhancements/modifications here and there…. Hence, there will be another following questions and so on and on

    Honestly, I am not so interested about the rackets used by pros since I won't picture myself using those "in disguise or modified for super pros" rackets and hoping that they will do the magic to instantly improve my games. I'd rather know something new of what kind of rackets that we can easily buy off the shelf in the market, because in the end, they will be the available menu for us to choose.
    For certain cases, of course, I admit that I keep a few collections of previously owned/used by top pro players but they are purely for commemorative purpose.

  14. #31
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    shingaporu
    Posts
    503
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by quixilver View Post
    If it was the real Arc FB, then I think the next question will be "What was the spec ? Was it the 5U or F or something else ?"…. since we all know that manufacturing process of badminton rackets still partly hand-made, it would be so easy to do enhancements/modifications here and there…. Hence, there will be another following questions and so on and on

    Honestly, I am not so interested about the rackets used by pros since I won't picture myself using those "in disguise or modified for super pros" rackets and hoping that they will do the magic to instantly improve my games. I'd rather know something new of what kind of rackets that we can easily buy off the shelf in the market, because in the end, they will be the available menu for us to choose.
    For certain cases, of course, I admit that I keep a few collections of previously owned/used by top pro players but they are purely for commemorative purpose.

    the general consensus from the chinese forums at least, is that they are using the exact models, except that the racquets are "cherry picked" for certain traits/behaviours as requested by the players.

    Boe uses a Voltric 80 4U. and i wont be surprised if Moe's using the 5U FB, and if you cherry pick you can possibly get some FBs that are even closer to 4U weight. Given the FB's extremely high balance (310+), if you have the heavier FBs in the batch, i wont think it will be that floppy or weak.

  15. #32
    Regular Member uselessmail's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    263
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    To look at it from a different perspective... I guess the manufacturers may intentionally be 'dumbing down' the specs of their top tier rackets for 'normal' players like us. Case is point, someone like Lin Dan or FHF have such exceptionally strong wrists and arms that they would naturally demand a much more stiffer racket than what we are normally used to so as to get the maximum out it. Remember how Sho Sasaki absolutely destroyed his racket and that too with a backhand once! If the normal public were to get their hands on the actual N90 that LD plays with, I am sure that quite a few would find it too unresponsive and that create a negative impression on the brand. I think that is also a factor in recommended string tensions as well by manufacturers.

    I remember this one time a guy in my club had bought an Arcsaber Z slash when it'd just been released, strung it with 29lbs (since he'd heard some XYZ player had the same) and tried playing with it. He was so thoroughly frustrated that he couldn't hit the fastest smash (as promised) that he started dissing the racket to anyone who'd listen. It actually put off a lot of people from buying it at that time.

    So, its a fine line I guess. The manufacturers market their newest product as the greatest and most awesome racket available but will still try and keep the specs down enough so that buyers are more or less satisfied with their expensive purchase.

  16. #33
    Regular Member Maklike Tier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    3,253
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The vast majority of players simply won't play at their best with pro-spec rackets, and have the most to lose by doing so.

    If I was sponsoring a pro, I'd have a real hard time making them a very specific racket and trying to pass it off as a stock model.

    I think I'd rather take the F1 route - sure, you can by a Maclaren or Honda or whatever, but you can't buy an F1 car down at the local dealer. Same with a Pro racket. I might make just enough of them for the sponsored player to use during the year, or at worst make a couple of hundred and give the player some and sell the rest for a ridiculous price (USD350+ each), but that would be it. You couldn't go down the shop and just buy one.

    By doing this I think you'd be being more honest and transparent, and not encouraging people to believe in myths and untruths. Players should be encouraged to play at their own pace and level with equipment that makes them better, no forced to struggle with rackets clearly unsuited to them that adversely effect their game and even on occasion exacerbate or cause injury.

  17. #34
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Mumbai
    Posts
    1,576
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'd really like to know black and white facts actually. What exactly are the specs (head weight bla bla bla) of rackets used by LCW, LD, Mogensen etc, compared to the specs of the respective rackets on the market?

    And I don't want 2nd hand knowledge or speculation. Just plain facts. And you know what, I wouldn't be at all surprised if most pros didn't have a personally customised racket. I also wouldn't be surprised if they did.

    Vast majority of players won't play at their best with pro-spec rackets? Who knows, that's just speculation. What would be more certain is that most (amateur) players in the world won't play at their best with wooden rackets compared to current "high end" rackets. But in my opinion, I reckon most "B-level and above" players would play similarly with any "pro-spec" racket once they get used to it. I believe that if you have good technique etc, swinging a ~100g piece of equipment is not hard even if it was "really stiff" or "really head heavy". Look at those little chinese girls from China in eg. Women's Doubles - they are probably smashing harder than many amateurs here, and I wouldn't be surprised if they are using head heavy and stiff rackets. For the (physically fit) guys in this forum, do you honestly think they are physically stronger than you?

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •