User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 17 of 24
  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Sussex
    Posts
    66
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Who would win? Lee Chong Wei or Xia Xuanze

    Think of both players at the top of their game. Both very quick around the court both good on power and round the head. I was wondering who would win in a game with modern rules and another game with old rule as Lee plays with modern and Xia played with old. Thanks

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Outside the box
    Posts
    14,273
    Mentioned
    48 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Chong Wei.

  3. #3
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    36,149
    Mentioned
    55 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Lee Chong Wei.

    even though I am a big fan of Xia, he doesn't have the speed nor is as complete a player as LCW.

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    aberdeen
    Posts
    747
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    From the matches Xia played LD and LCW play LD, LCW have more shots. LCW win.

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    3,011
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Seems that LCW considered far better player when comparing each in their prime.
    Next question should be, will LCW ever be as good a coach as XXZ?

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    icy cold place
    Posts
    3,778
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fidget View Post
    Seems that LCW considered far better player when comparing each in their prime.
    Next question should be, will LCW ever be as good a coach as XXZ?
    With a pupil in Lin Dan, XXZ job as coach is made a lot easier. Same for Rashid Sidek with LCW as pupil, LCW wins games for RS. A better comparison should LCW goes into coaching would be who can take a new comrade or new recruit and groom into a world or Olympic champion. Also, you may want to review past videos and check out how often LD is even listening to XXZ during breaks in the game against LCW. If Tang is coaching Lin Dan, LD would pay attention, not to XXZ.

  7. #7
    Regular Member AlanY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    England
    Posts
    4,568
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i hope nobody going to start a who would win? LCW or Zhao Jian Hua thread.

    Nobody, nobody would beat ZJH as his best. Not even Lin Dan.

  8. #8
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    HK
    Posts
    165
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AlanY View Post
    i hope nobody going to start a who would win? LCW or Zhao Jian Hua thread.

    Nobody, nobody would beat ZJH as his best. Not even Lin Dan.
    Two thumbs up, 100% agree with you, Zhao Jian Hua is the best, he's the forever "God Of Badminton"

  9. #9
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    icy cold place
    Posts
    3,778
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AlanY View Post
    i hope nobody going to start a who would win? LCW or Zhao Jian Hua thread.

    Nobody, nobody would beat ZJH as his best. Not even Lin Dan.
    LD-ZJH, this is a really tough one, 2 players I rank the best all time. But who is better? 1990AE, ZJH perhaps played his best game and the most captivating badminton game I have ever seen anyone play. LD in 2008 OLY, perhaps LD best game I would say, flawless despite the huge pressure playing in CHN 1st OLY. If both LD and ZJH are at their best and play each other, I am screwed who I would bet. As for LCW to ZJH, that is not even a bet, forget it, I better save my buck and go buy a loto.

  10. #10
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Citizen of The World
    Posts
    17,455
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Zhao Jianhua or Lin Dan ? They are, to me , two of a kind, very little separates the two - they are in a class of their own.

    For ZJH, if not for his contracting pneumonia at a young age of 20 which impaired his lung capacity,unfortunately, Heaven knows how many titles he would have won, how dominant or great he might have been - and I would even rate him slightly higher than Lin Dan to be the Greatest of All Time.

    As it is we or I , speaking for myself, would never know but , based on accolades and results alone, I've to admit Lin Dan as No.1 with Zhao Jianhua a close second, well ahead of the rest.

  11. #11
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    1,398
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I've always been a big fan of ZJH, in fact he was my only "idiol" growing up. There was nobody that could really compare with him when he was at his best.

    LD was never an idiol of mine, and although I admire his abilities, I would never consider myself a fan of LD. However, with respect, I don’t think ZJH at his prime would beat LD at his prime.

    ZJH was a genuine natural talent. A prodigy in his day, exceptional skill and hugely intelligent. But the game has changed. Standards are much higher now and more knowledge has been gained over the years. Training can be more focused with sports science and dietary understanding. As more countries play the sport, more money is invested into training facilities and coaching, equipment etc and naturally the sport becomes more competitive. More competitions and more participants.

    Whilst in Zhao’s day, the tempo of the rallies were a little slower, perhaps due to racquet technology in part which didn’t allow high tension strings – it made badminton exciting to watch as there were longer rallies but the new scoring system also influenced this too.

    ZJH had a beautiful technique, smooth, natural and efficient – probably the best I’ve seen. LD on the other hand has a more functional style. Not as pretty to look at, but effective. I’m not suggesting that ZJH would not have been better than LD had he been born in the same era as LD (that would be a different story), but given the poorer training, knowledge, resources, equipment, facilities, monetary factors that ZJH had in his time the standard of play, in my opinion at least, is not on par with the best of today. LD (although not easily) would definitely beat ZJH imo.

    XXZ vs LCW? LCW.

  12. #12
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    229
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Anyone in the current top ten (or even top twenty) would be able to beat these so called greats from yesteryear, even at their prime. Sports technology has evolved considerably in the last twenty years. It's a bit silly to even discuss this. One just has to look at the scrawny physique of most of these players from the past to know they wouldn't stand a chance against a buff Lin Dan or Chong Wei, who are ten times quicker and can probably outlast the rest by two or three sets. It's like comparing Djokovic or Nadal with McEnroe or Borg.

  13. #13
    Regular Member TheSmasherKing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Somewhere on earth...
    Posts
    597
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    definetly go for lcw

  14. #14
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Victoria/Waterloo, Canada
    Posts
    36
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I am the biggest Xia Xuan Ze fan, though I'd like to analyse this from a unbiased perspective. Since the 2 didn't have much of a overlapping competing era, I have to use some anchors for this comparison.

    1) Overall Head to Head is 2-1 in XXZ's favor
    2) The last LCW vs XXZ encounter that I know of went 15-0 in LCW's way in the 2nd game. Soon after XXZ retired. At the time, LCW was rising, XXZ was mature but declining.
    3) XXZ's head to head vs LD is 4-5, losing all of his games after 2003. Again, XXZ was declining and LD started dominating post 2003
    4) XXZ has 50-50 head to head vs TH and PG, both of whom competed well past their prime.

    Roughly speaking, we know XXZ is just as good, if not better than TH and PG, or the young LCW, LD. From recently results, we also know that LCW and LD are better than TH and PG. Mature players destroying younger players is common, however, LCW and LD have dominated over almost 2 generations of young players (Chen Jin who's retired, and Chen Long who's already 25).

    Purely from this partial analysis, LCW seems to have an edge over XXZ.

    I am curious though how XXZ would have adapted to the 21 point system if he chose to compete longer like TH and PG did. He may not have done well since he's always been a very physical player, instead of a methodical one.

  15. #15
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    36,149
    Mentioned
    55 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    i voted for LCW as can see in earlier post.

    the criteria for that is purely the score. LCW will win base on him being faster and more complete player.

    however, XXZ is not just about winning, his style, flair and dynamic play is what attracted many of his fans.


  16. #16
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Victoria/Waterloo, Canada
    Posts
    36
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kwun View Post
    however, XXZ is not just about winning, his style, flair and dynamic play is what attracted many of his fans.
    Yes Kwun , fight-on XXZ!

  17. #17
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    -
    Posts
    204
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by voltric View Post
    anyone in the current top ten (or even top twenty) would be able to beat these so called greats from yesteryear, even at their prime. Sports technology has evolved considerably in the last twenty years. It's a bit silly to even discuss this. One just has to look at the scrawny physique of most of these players from the past to know they wouldn't stand a chance against a buff lin dan or chong wei, who are ten times quicker and can probably outlast the rest by two or three sets. It's like comparing djokovic or nadal with mcenroe or borg.
    more than agree. You can never compare an old school player against the new era players.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •