Hi all, Forgive me if its a repeat topic. But how does Victor's BS12N compare with MX JJS? Both are regarded as Victor's best line of rackets and I've heard many good things from alot of people on this forum. But how different are they and what are each racquets' key points? Victor marketed 12N as "faster", more responsive and very light. As for MX JJS, its more like a power racket as marketed for JJS fans, so I'd assume its heavier and stiffer? Cheers.
Firstly, u nd to ask urself, what kind of game do u usually play. Is it aggressive, defensive or all-rounder? BS12N is an even-balanced, mid-stiff racket designed to have a fast swing, excellent to use at mid-court n the net. Many considered BS12N to b a defensive racket. MX-JJS is a head-heavy, stiff racket good for all-round play. Though it is slower than the above, it feels more solid n packs quite a punch in the smashing department.
Thanks so much for your informative input. I don't think I specialize particularly in attack or defensive, so I guess I'm all-rounded.
MX-90 plays closer to MX-JJS being in the same Meteor range n having somewhat similar specs. The shaft of MX-90 is thinner compared to MX-JJS, making it slightly flexier. For more detailed reviews, u might want to check "Paul Stewart badminton coach" website. It also has BS-12N review. Cheerio : )
I have surveyed the price. MX JJS pretty much expensive compare to MX 90. I will decide by end of 2013