User Tag List

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 17 of 42
  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    San Jose, Ca
    Posts
    203
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Gamma progression ii 602 vs 602FC vs Pro's Pro challenger 1 - Fixed clamps questions?

    Hi Everyone,

    I've recently decided that I want to sell my Pro's Pro shuttle express (on sale in the buy/sell) and get a 6 point dropweight machine. Reason being that I found that I miss the string jobs of my old Klippermate m140 as they were more consistent and the machine needed less maintenance.

    I'm currently deciding between the Gamma progression II 602FC, Progression 602 (no fixed clamps), and Pro's Pro challenger 1 and I would greatly appreciate some input.

    They all appeal to me because they're table top dropweights with a ratchet, however I don't know if the fixed clamps are worth the extra money.


    1. Do fixed clamps provide a convenience that warrant the much higher price tag (relative to its non fixed clamp counter part)?
    2. What advantages do fixed clamps have over flying clamps?
    3. Will the larger turntable/base of the fixed clamp machines translate to a more sturdy/stable turn table vs the progression 602 that has a more narrow bar?
    4. How does the quality of the Pro's Pro machine match up against the more expensive Gamma?


    Thanks everyone!

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Delta
    Posts
    91
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I don't know about propro but my gamma progression 602fc fixed clamps were not meant for badminton stringing, so the crosses were a pain to do since the teeth's did not work well. I had to spend an extra 120 dollars for the gamma fixed badminton clamps

    HOWEVER, after i got the badminton fixed clamp the results were much different and better compared to using yonex flying clamps. I believe fixed clamps are better because they have a better grip as well i believe that racquets do not move/shift as much during the end crosses because the string is clamped to the fixed clamps which are clamped to the turn table as the flying clamp is just flying in the air without stabilizing the racquet.

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    San Jose, Ca
    Posts
    203
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Thanks for the feedback heroclass. The extra $120 brings the overall price range of the 602FC beyond my budget. Were the original clamps unable to be used for badminton or simply inconvenient? How would it perform if I used the stock fixed clamps for the mains, but 2 yonex flying clamps for the crosses?

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    647
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    They are inconvenient but you will get used to it eventually.

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    133
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    If you are ordering the pro's pro, I would suggest ordering from w&dstrings, they would replace the tennis clamps for you for badminton ones for roughly $40

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    San Jose, Ca
    Posts
    203
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    It seems that the Pro's Pro clamps are about half the price of the Gamma clamps. Would I be able to fit the Pro's Pro clamps onto the gamma clamp bases?

  7. #7
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    15
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I am getting back into stringing (mostly for myself) and am having the same dilemma, fixed clamp or floating clamp. Obviously fixed will be superior but is it worth the excess cost. I'm trying to justify the 602fc to myself by saying that I'll be more confident that I'll be able to deliver more consistent string jobs and that will be important if I start to string for other people. Am I really just trying to talk myself into spending more money or am I correct in that statement? I also am trying to find out if the cheaper Pro's Pro clamps fit onto the 602fc.
    @bobbinbette , where are you looking for your 602fc? I've generally seen them for $499USD, have you found anything cheaper

  8. #8
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    San Jose, Ca
    Posts
    203
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    @xgumbyx , I didn't find anything cheaper than $499 for the 602FC.

    I ended up going with floating clamps because you can still do very good string jobs with them. Adding badminton fixed clamps to the Gamma progression 602FC brings the total cost up to $630 and that's beyond my budget.

  9. #9
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    San Jose, Ca
    Posts
    203
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I just received my Progression 602 and strung one racket so far and it works great!
    However, I do have one small concern about the badminton support mount and I was hoping someone with experience in Gamma machines could give me some feedback.

    The frame of the racket doesn't seem to sit in the middle of the badminton support as shown in @kwun 's gamma 6004. Instead, the top edge of the badminton support seems to be below the top of the racket frame. Is this normal? Could this be due to the new badminton side supports?

    I was so worried about the load spreader coming loose from the frame that I switched it back for the standard 1 point 12 o'clock support that came with the machine.

    Name:  IMAG0770.jpg
Views: 332
Size:  38.2 KB
    Name:  IMAG0773.jpg
Views: 335
Size:  43.9 KB

  10. #10
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Delta
    Posts
    91
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Oh well I have the 602fc and I use the MBS load spreader with slight modifications since the width of the 12-6oclock posts width didn't fit the load. But since I'm using the load spreader I didn't have the same problem as you even with the badminton side support. However your picture looks completely fine and I would say it wouldn't even be a problem. I think its even better since u bought the actual gamma load spreader

  11. #11
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Delta
    Posts
    91
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Also how did you got those badminton aide supports? They seem to be a better design than the ones gamma provided.

  12. #12
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    San Jose, Ca
    Posts
    203
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    @heroclass I just purchased the machine about 2 weeks ago.

    Do you find that the tension scale is accurate? Using the small weight, do you follow the 10-40lb scale on the bar? I found that the 40lb mark only gave ~26lbs tension according to my electronic fishing weight.

    Hm, maybe i'm over thinking everything. I'll try stringing a racket with the Gamma load spreader. If it slips, I'll return it and get MBS load spreaders.

  13. #13
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    San Jose, Ca
    Posts
    203
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Edit: Sorry! double post
    Last edited by bobbinbette; 02-18-2014 at 01:05 PM. Reason: double post

  14. #14
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Delta
    Posts
    91
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Can you elaborate more about the accuracy of the drop weight? All I know is I have a huge cylindrical weight on my weight that ranges to around 80 or 90lbs

  15. #15
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    San Jose, Ca
    Posts
    203
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    @heroclass , the dropweight bar has 2 sets of numbers(lbs and kg each). 1 set of numbers ranging up to 90lbs and its corresponding kg weight. This is for the whole weight assembly (large and small portions together).

    The second set of numbers ranges up to 40lbs and its corresponding kg weight. This is meant for only the small portion of the weight assembly.

    The second set of numbers is what I was told to use by Gamma and to use the small weight. However, it seems inaccurate when I check with my electronic fishing weight.

    Do you use the whole weight assembly or just the small portion?

  16. #16
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    35,994
    Mentioned
    55 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bobbinbette View Post
    I just received my Progression 602 and strung one racket so far and it works great!
    However, I do have one small concern about the badminton support mount and I was hoping someone with experience in Gamma machines could give me some feedback.

    The frame of the racket doesn't seem to sit in the middle of the badminton support as shown in @kwun 's gamma 6004. Instead, the top edge of the badminton support seems to be below the top of the racket frame. Is this normal? Could this be due to the new badminton side supports?

    I was so worried about the load spreader coming loose from the frame that I switched it back for the standard 1 point 12 o'clock support that came with the machine.

    Name:  IMAG0770.jpg
Views: 332
Size:  38.2 KB
    Name:  IMAG0773.jpg
Views: 335
Size:  43.9 KB
    that indeed is worrying. but i wouldn't worry that the frame will slip out of the support. i think it might go the other way. ie, it will slide down the contour of the 12 o'clock support toward the middle of the plastic piece. what will happen then is the racket frame will be slightly warped during the stringing process. which is never a good thing.

    it looks like Gamma has made a mistake in the positioning of the new support, the center line of the side support doesn't line up with the centerline of the end support.

  17. #17
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    647
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I had the same problem with the 12 o'clock support. Due to the new mounts the racket lies a bit higher than before so you need a longer support for the 12 o'clock. Just contact your retailer.

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •