Rackets keep on breaking!!

Discussion in 'Badminton Stringing Techniques & Tools' started by bdmtfreak, Jul 4, 2014.

  1. bdmtfreak

    bdmtfreak Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    101
    Likes Received:
    20
    Location:
    canada
    So heres my story, I started stringing rackets last year and everything was going smoothly until a few months ago where I frequently break rackets during a stringing job. They all break at the 4/8 o clock area when I get to the bottom half of the cross.

    I make sure that the supports are snug (not tight) when setting the racket up and I tighten them when they get loose during the cross. What is going on here!?!?!?

    p.s. Some rackets are older so I understand that they may have existing damage but I broke a brand new racket the other day so I have no idea what is going on.
     
  2. kwun

    kwun Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2002
    Messages:
    41,048
    Likes Received:
    2,073
    Occupation:
    BC Janitor
    Location:
    Santa Clara, CA, USA
    take a picture of how you mount a racket and post here. likely the 4/8 supports are too high.

    or you can switch to bottoms up cross.
     
  3. zombie0517

    zombie0517 Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2009
    Messages:
    227
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Canberra
    All things being equal, bottom up methods seems like a safer bet than top down.
     
  4. bdmtfreak

    bdmtfreak Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    101
    Likes Received:
    20
    Location:
    canada
    Sometimes the racket heads are a different size/shape so I have to adjust the 6/12 o clock supports so that the other supports do not block any holes. When I do this, would I have to reposition the other 4 supports since they would either shift up or down a racket?
     
  5. kwun

    kwun Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2002
    Messages:
    41,048
    Likes Received:
    2,073
    Occupation:
    BC Janitor
    Location:
    Santa Clara, CA, USA
    depends where they start off with. that's why i asked for a photo of how you mount your racket.
     
  6. bdmtfreak

    bdmtfreak Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    101
    Likes Received:
    20
    Location:
    canada
    Okay, I will do it when I get home. Can't seem to upload a photo using my phone.
     
  7. demonderrick

    demonderrick Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2014
    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Taiwan
    What pattern are you using? if you are using the Gosen 2012 pattern, it is no surprise that it breaks at 4/8 o'clock if the racket isn't strong enough to start with, so, how you mount the racket matters!!! Bottom up patterns are always safer than upside down, I just don't like it that way!
     
  8. bdmtfreak

    bdmtfreak Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    101
    Likes Received:
    20
    Location:
    canada
    20140705_110913.jpg 20140705_114438.jpg

    here are the pictures.
     
  9. Mark A

    Mark A Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    Messages:
    7,170
    Likes Received:
    695
    Location:
    St Helens, UK
    If you are going top-down, the supports could be lower on the racket - your 4/8 supports could come in between B12 and B10, and your upper supports could move down a few holes.
     
  10. dbswansea

    dbswansea Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2012
    Messages:
    2,525
    Likes Received:
    153
    Occupation:
    IT
    Location:
    Swansea
    no load spreaders and racquet on bare metal at 12 and 6?
     
  11. Cheung

    Cheung Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2002
    Messages:
    23,845
    Likes Received:
    4,811
    Occupation:
    wannabe badminton phototaker
    Location:
    Outside the box
    Something has changed. Are the tensions bein strung now higher now than previously?

    If not, has the crank been altered and needs recalibrating?
     
  12. wlotus

    wlotus Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2013
    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    TX US
    What kind of pattern are u using? What kind of tension are u stringing the racket? If you do top-down method, 4/8 o'clock is going to be your racket's weak points. TBSSA recently has a discussion and research about this issue. Below are facts they found:

    1. Bottom-up method is safer than Top-down method
    2. If you'd like to mount your racket the way shown from your pictures and prefer the feeling of top-down method, they recommend patterns which has a protection cross string strung at B12-D12 before stringing crosses in sweat spot area. Some possible patterns are FA or Spider patterns that I posted earlier in this forum.

    If you're OK to move side supports, you can go with what Mark A suggested and keep using the same pattern you're using today. Otherwise, consider changing to another pattern.
     
  13. Mark A

    Mark A Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    Messages:
    7,170
    Likes Received:
    695
    Location:
    St Helens, UK
    Holy moly... I thought those white Superman symbols were the loadspreaders!

    That needs correcting immediately
     
  14. dbswansea

    dbswansea Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2012
    Messages:
    2,525
    Likes Received:
    153
    Occupation:
    IT
    Location:
    Swansea
    I'm sure a similar set up cracked my 8dx at 12 o'clock.
     
  15. Mark A

    Mark A Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    Messages:
    7,170
    Likes Received:
    695
    Location:
    St Helens, UK
    I had an AT800Off die of high-noon-disease about five years ago... before I started with the load spreader.

    The thought of doing a racket without one now... it's like skydiving without a parachute.
     
  16. dbswansea

    dbswansea Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2012
    Messages:
    2,525
    Likes Received:
    153
    Occupation:
    IT
    Location:
    Swansea
    It was that incident that convinced me to string myself.
     
  17. Mark A

    Mark A Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    Messages:
    7,170
    Likes Received:
    695
    Location:
    St Helens, UK
    Mine getting lost in the post was what did it for me:D.
     
  18. DuckFeet

    DuckFeet Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2012
    Messages:
    2,033
    Likes Received:
    320
    Occupation:
    Computer rebooter
    Location:
    Swindon
    You lightweights, I ticked ALL the boxes in the thread on reasons to string for yourself.

    Aren't those lower supports in the wrong holes? That probably helped break my first attempt at stringing.
     
  19. Mark A

    Mark A Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    Messages:
    7,170
    Likes Received:
    695
    Location:
    St Helens, UK
    IME the supports need to be biased in the direction that the crosses will go.
     
  20. DuckFeet

    DuckFeet Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2012
    Messages:
    2,033
    Likes Received:
    320
    Occupation:
    Computer rebooter
    Location:
    Swindon
    I'm still learning then :) thanks.

    Good luck to the OP, keep us posted.
     

Share This Page