User Tag List

Results 1 to 16 of 16
  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    24
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Which kind of smash?

    Which kind of smash gives you the most satisfaction when you perform it perfectly?

    1) A thunderous one shot kill smash which pierce through opponent's defense.

    2) A well-placed but moderate strength smash which aims at opponent's defense weakness.

    3) A series of smashes which attempts to break the opponent's defense.

    I would prefer the first one. It kinda makes me feel superior over my opponents. But normally I ended up doing the third one cause my smash is not hard enough.

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    547
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    A well-placed power smash from the back by my partner which sets up a mid- to fore-court kill by me.

    Phil

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Glasgow, Scotland
    Posts
    1,920
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Smashes

    Has to be the second one because it takes more skill to aim a smash properly and get it on target, anyone can hit a "big wallop" which is too quick for the opponent to get back.

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Merseyside, England
    Posts
    308
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Thumbs up

    me i like to smash to get their defense down then i will do a thunderous smash to finish off

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    276
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by longtimeuser
    1) A thunderous one shot kill smash which pierce through opponent's defense.
    At higher levels of badminton, the defence tends to be so good that smashes generally are returned very consistently, and blocks tend to be well placed; so, in these circumstances it is unlikely that you would win a point outright with killer smashes as you might expect at a more recreational level.

    The best you can hope for is that by varying the smash, and hitting a hard but controlled smash to parts of the court just out of the opponent's immediate reach, the opponent will be caught off-balance and play a weak return (or even mishit/miss it completely), providing you with an opportunity such as a net-kill. I noticed this particularly during the mixed doubles fnal at the All England 2004, in which Kim Dong-Moon could often be seen hitting six or seven hard smashes consecutively without breaking down the defence of Kim Yong-Hyun & Lee Hyo-Jung.

    While it is unlikely that the majority of your opponents (and the majority of players below international standard), "longtimeuser", will have such a developed defence, it is also unlikely that you will be able to smash as hard and steep as those of the standard of Kim Dong Moon, so the same principle applies.

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    276
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default I almost forgot to answer the question

    ...Having your opponent pop up the shuttle (as though a mocking invitation for you to try again) after your hardest smash cannot be very satisfying; so, I think no.2 is preferable but with a hard, controlled smash.

  7. #7
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Merseyside, England
    Posts
    308
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    and also it's not anything to do with your racket i use a 35 GB Pound Inflight Racket and a 105 GB Pound Yonex MP 99 and i can smash as hard with the 35 GB Racket as i can with the Yonex MP 99

  8. #8
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Basement Boiler Room
    Posts
    22,118
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    the untouchable type of smashes that land +/- 3 inch inside the side line.

  9. #9
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario
    Posts
    649
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    my favourite: trying to beat the crap out of a mid court smash, then hacking it and it just goes over =)

  10. #10
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Montreal (514)
    Posts
    1,229
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Mine is a moderate strenght smash in the corners, especially right after a high serve. That's my killa shot hehehe.

  11. #11
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Fremont, SJSU, USA
    Posts
    194
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    1 and 3, 3 more because it gives me more satisfaction

  12. #12
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    24
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ynexfan2003
    At higher levels of badminton, the defence tends to be so good that smashes generally are returned very consistently, and blocks tend to be well placed; so, in these circumstances it is unlikely that you would win a point outright with killer smashes as you might expect at a more recreational level.

    The best you can hope for is that by varying the smash, and hitting a hard but controlled smash to parts of the court just out of the opponent's immediate reach, the opponent will be caught off-balance and play a weak return (or even mishit/miss it completely), providing you with an opportunity such as a net-kill. I noticed this particularly during the mixed doubles fnal at the All England 2004, in which Kim Dong-Moon could often be seen hitting six or seven hard smashes consecutively without breaking down the defence of Kim Yong-Hyun & Lee Hyo-Jung.

    While it is unlikely that the majority of your opponents (and the majority of players below international standard), "longtimeuser", will have such a developed defence, it is also unlikely that you will be able to smash as hard and steep as those of the standard of Kim Dong Moon, so the same principle applies.
    Yes that's why I mentioned that I tend to do the No. 3 kind of smash because my opponents have good defense. But as what I said, the No. 1 kind of smash gives me the most satisfaction.

  13. #13
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    24
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Seems like almost everyone likes the No. 2 smash.

  14. #14
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    35,956
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    if able to execute it perfectly, i prefer the thundering smash that hits bang on and scrapes of some of the paint of the sideline.

  15. #15
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Waterloo, ON
    Posts
    153
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I prefer to pretend I can't smash at first...ie: do drops.
    Then do my power smash right at my opponent when they expect another drop. At the intermediate level this works, and is pretty satisfying But then they catch on and try not to clear to me anymore =/.

  16. #16
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    UK - London, Birmingham
    Posts
    768
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I like it when playing against defensive players, to keep smashing at them forcing them to play an error. In these situations, I like to play a slower and accurate smash to their weakspots. They believe the smash was not fast, and they had lost the ralley, but I prefer to think that I won the ralley with precision aiming and ability to change the pace!

    In any case, I have yet the ability to smash down steeply and powerfully, only one or the other.....

Similar Threads

  1. Trade-off between powerful smash and steep smash
    By huynd in forum Techniques / Training
    Replies: 14
    : 06-24-2010, 02:39 PM
  2. changing mindset (I just smash smash smash, and its not always working)
    By giant_q_tip in forum Techniques / Training
    Replies: 17
    : 04-05-2010, 08:38 AM
  3. problems with smash, jumping smash and flick serve
    By llpjlau in forum Techniques / Training
    Replies: 22
    : 04-21-2006, 02:52 PM
  4. What kind of smash u do most often??
    By mp-30 in forum Techniques / Training
    Replies: 72
    : 01-27-2006, 10:21 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •