First Racquet Strung

Discussion in 'Badminton Rackets / Equipment' started by Neil Nicholls, Jul 16, 2004.

  1. Neil Nicholls

    Neil Nicholls Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2002
    Messages:
    2,908
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Cannock, UK
    I now qualify as a Novice Stringer

    Got my stringing machine this morning (Gamma Progression II 602) and I have just finished stringing my first racquet (at the 2nd attempt).

    On the first attempt (BG66 at 22lb) the main snapped somewhere near the tie off knot as I neared the end of the crosses.

    On the 2nd attempt (BG66 at 22lb again - I have a lot of BG66 lying around and nothing particularly thicker to practise with) I was a bit more careful tying the knots and everything went ok.
     
  2. cooler

    cooler Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2002
    Messages:
    21,811
    Likes Received:
    23
    Occupation:
    Surfing, reading fan mails:D, Dilithium Crystal hu
    Location:
    Basement Boiler Room
    congratulation. BTW, you didn't mention about the frame shape ;)
     
  3. Neil Nicholls

    Neil Nicholls Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2002
    Messages:
    2,908
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Cannock, UK
    It was my cheapo Carlton Aerogear 1000 FX. It started as an oval and finished up a fraction narrower in the 2/10 o'clock, and a bit fatter in the 5/7 o'clock area compared to an unstrung as-ti. Pretty much the same shape as an as1 strung by someone else.
     
  4. cooler

    cooler Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2002
    Messages:
    21,811
    Likes Received:
    23
    Occupation:
    Surfing, reading fan mails:D, Dilithium Crystal hu
    Location:
    Basement Boiler Room
    I see u followed the yonex's stringing pattern :p
    what type is your machine, drop wt or spring tensioned crank style?
     
  5. Neil Nicholls

    Neil Nicholls Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2002
    Messages:
    2,908
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Cannock, UK
    Drop weight.
    I just copied the pattern that was in before.
     
  6. kwun

    kwun Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2002
    Messages:
    41,043
    Likes Received:
    2,066
    Occupation:
    BC Janitor
    Location:
    Santa Clara, CA, USA
    Neil,

    congratulations! stringing racket is not for the faint of heart. the amount of tension you are pulling on that poor baby is quite a lot (enough force to raise a small car). this a first step to a whole world of learning. start from the basics and move up from there. there are quite a few discussions here in BF as well as articles on the net.

    good luck!
     
  7. LazyBuddy

    LazyBuddy Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    10,096
    Likes Received:
    15
    Occupation:
    Engineer
    Location:
    New York, US
    Congrats!!!

    How long it took you for the 2nd attempt? I am sure after another several trials, you can speed up and enjoy the process even more. Time to get some baddy VCDs, as string+VCD is a wonderful combo. :D
     
    #7 LazyBuddy, Jul 16, 2004
    Last edited: Jul 16, 2004
  8. Dill

    Dill Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2003
    Messages:
    1,922
    Likes Received:
    1
    Occupation:
    Lazy git (my coach can verify this)
    Location:
    Glasgow, Scotland
    Just let me know when you'll start using gut ;) My stringer hates it because it unravels and splits when stringing if you are not carefull.

    Well done it's all easier from here on in, the first one is always the hardest.
     
  9. Neil Nicholls

    Neil Nicholls Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2002
    Messages:
    2,908
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Cannock, UK
    Thanks Kwun.
    I know. I think I've read most of them.
    And now I'll be going back to them looking for tips on weaving the crosses.
    That seems to be my slowest bit. But then I'm pulling the string through quite slow to avoid friction burns. I don't know how fast is safe, so I have to do it slow.
    I'll have to dig out that link to the Silent Partner stringing contest video.
     
  10. kwun

    kwun Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2002
    Messages:
    41,043
    Likes Received:
    2,066
    Occupation:
    BC Janitor
    Location:
    Santa Clara, CA, USA
    are you doing a diagonal pull? reduces friction/burn. pulls much faster.
     
  11. taneepak

    taneepak Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2004
    Messages:
    6,526
    Likes Received:
    25
    Occupation:
    Designing and producing quality feather shuttlecoc
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    The slight distortion at the 2/10 o'clock and 5/7 o'clock areas are typical of a 2-point machine without side supports, if you string the crosses from the top towards the throat. However, you can minimize the distortion by stringing the crosses from the middle. Using a starting clamp will be useful if you plan to string the crosses from the middle. :)
     
  12. Neil Nicholls

    Neil Nicholls Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2002
    Messages:
    2,908
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Cannock, UK
    over an hour.
    I've got loads from Han already.

    found some misweaves in my first two.
    Third looks ok.

    Here's something else I learnt.
    Dont string black string in poor lighting.
    Stringing in daylight is easier than under a 60 watt bulb
     
  13. Neil Nicholls

    Neil Nicholls Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2002
    Messages:
    2,908
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Cannock, UK
    yep.
    but like I say, I don't know how fast is fast.
    Time will tell, I guess.
     
  14. Cheung

    Cheung Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2002
    Messages:
    23,817
    Likes Received:
    4,791
    Occupation:
    wannabe badminton phototaker
    Location:
    Outside the box
    Can't you use a cheaper string ? It must get pretty expensive practising with BG66
     
  15. Neil Nicholls

    Neil Nicholls Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2002
    Messages:
    2,908
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Cannock, UK

    It is a 6-point. The distortion was maybe 0.5mm each side.
    I have considered starting from the middle (which would also mean less string to pull through with each weave), but I've been almost coming up short on string at the end of the crosses. From overestimating how much I needed for the mains.
     
  16. kwun

    kwun Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2002
    Messages:
    41,043
    Likes Received:
    2,066
    Occupation:
    BC Janitor
    Location:
    Santa Clara, CA, USA
    i actually think it is a wise choice, for two reasons...

    1. bg66 is thin. Neil is just starting up so thinner string may be easier to string.

    2. bg66 is fragile. Neil just got a brand new toy and like most, i want to play with my toys more often when they are new. if he strings with bg65, no matter how hard he smashes, the next time he get to string a new racket will be at least a few weeks. if he strings with bg66, he smash like crazy maybe he can have a racket to play with (erm... string) next weekend....

    see? :D
     
  17. JRMTL

    JRMTL Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2004
    Messages:
    146
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Math teacher and coach at Univesity of Montreal
    Location:
    Montreal, Canada
    That make my day! I laughed so loud when I red that!

    But I find you patient stringing rackets (sp?). I would throw the machine by the window if I had some problems doing a little tie!!!

    Well done buddy!

    JRMTL
     
  18. taneepak

    taneepak Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2004
    Messages:
    6,526
    Likes Received:
    25
    Occupation:
    Designing and producing quality feather shuttlecoc
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    I don't quite understand : if you have a 6-point machine, presumbly one with a top and throat and 4 side supports, and if the 4 point (8 supports) side has V-shaped supports, there should be no distortion. The V-shaped side supports, if properly and securely mounted should eliminate any outward distortion. The inward distortion at the 2/10 o'clock position is only possible if there is a compensating outward distortion at the 5/7 o'clock position. With the side V-shaped supports, no outward distortion is possible. If there is no outward distortion, then no inward distortion is possible.
    I have found using 19 feet for the mains and the balance for the crosses to fit almost any type of racquet. :)
     
  19. Neil Nicholls

    Neil Nicholls Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2002
    Messages:
    2,908
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Cannock, UK
    Lying around I had 6x BG66, 1x BG70Pro, 1x Gosen Biogut Bio Roots 70, 1x Ashaway Rally 22.

    I'm might stop using BG66 when my stock runs out, so it's less of a loss if I mes up.
     
  20. Neil Nicholls

    Neil Nicholls Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2002
    Messages:
    2,908
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Cannock, UK
    I dont think inward distortion has to compensated for by outward distortion at 5/7. The head and throat supports are internal only. They are not clamp down. So inward distortion at 2/10 could be compensated by expansion along the 12/6 axis. Then, when the 5/7 supports are removed, the frame relaxes into whatever shape it wants.

    I could be wrong.

    P.S.
    I haven't been adding extra lb for the crosses. I've used the same for X and M.
     

Share This Page