User Tag List
Results 1 to 6 of 6
-
11-17-2004, 05:50 AM #1
Oval head, isometric head and ovaliso head.
It seems that all the sponsored national players uses isometric heads. What do you think? Is it that good? I find it a bit wierd and too wide for the tension.
rgds
-
11-17-2004, 01:19 PM #2
SPONSORED, right? As in "free rackets"? Think about it. Would Yonex market push an old production line? It's less about player preference rather a marketing strategy.
-dave
-
11-17-2004, 03:00 PM #3
For yonex, most of the newly introduced models are ISO head, namely AT, MP series. Therefore, there's more chance that sponsored player will end up with a ISO racket rather than OVAL. However, there're a few players (including Olympics MS silver medal winner) do use OVAL rackets, such as Cab30ms.
-
11-17-2004, 03:04 PM #4
beside being free and paid to use them, there are more choices in the isometric frame so the chance of finding a suitable one is higher than say one mid to highend choice in oval, namely cab30
Originally Posted by wood_22_chuck
-
11-17-2004, 11:51 PM #5
whats... ovaliso..? is that suppose to be a mix between Iso and Oval?? :|
-
11-18-2004, 01:39 PM #6
perhaps some of those wide-head ovals?
Originally Posted by Yipom
i've seen some by black knight and carlton to be VERY hard to determine if its a iso that has it's corners curved off, or if it was a oval head that had the top pushed put to the corners a bit more than it should.
Similar Threads
-
Do you prefer isometric or oval head rackets?
By ttktom in forum Racket Recommendation / ComparisonReplies: 545: 05-19-2013, 07:49 AM -
Head heavy very stiff Oval Head racket ???
By pussiii999 in forum Racket Recommendation / ComparisonReplies: 17: 12-19-2008, 05:19 AM -
Oval Head Racquet
By t3tsubo in forum Racket Recommendation / ComparisonReplies: 7: 09-23-2006, 10:43 AM -
switching to oval from isometric head shape
By Josh in forum Badminton Rackets / EquipmentReplies: 4: 12-18-2001, 03:19 AM -
Isometric vs. Oval Head
By Vy in forum Badminton Rackets / EquipmentReplies: 14: 09-18-2001, 12:18 PM




Reply With Quote

Bookmarks