User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 17 of 32
  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    78
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default (Ideas'R'us) Improve the ability to distinguish fake/genuine racquets

    I have an idea, but this basically requires the company to implement a system.

    How about instead of having the serial number exposed on the racket right from the beginning.. apply a coat of silvery protective layer (u know .. those scratch n save type of layer).

    When a customer buys a racket (brand new one). He will then:

    1. scratch off the silvery layer.
    2. Register the serial number online. This, requires the racket company to keep track the serial numbers on every racket they manufacture.
    3. The webpage will show the racket type (eg. AT800.. etc) once the serial number is entered. (kinda like a confirmation thing)
    4. User then input their personal information
    6. User chooses a password they desire, so if the rackets changes hand later, the new user can enter new personal information (by going into the online system again)
    7. Register complete

    this will be hard for fake (i suppose) to imitate because,

    1. once a serial number is registered, i cannot be register again.. Hence, they cant just buy a genuine and make 1 million copies of it.

    2. fake companies cant just use a formula to generate these serial numbers. Well that's if the genuine company implement the generate number system well.. but basically random (no pattern, no nothing)


    so basically.. once a racket is made, the company will input the serial # in the database.. and waiting to be registered.

    What do you guys think?

    P.S. the above system HELPS to distinguish fakes and genuines... but it doesn't prevent people from buying fakes.. (because you can't see the serial number and even if you can you dunno if the serial number is valid or not)
    Last edited by newbi; 12-14-2004 at 10:15 PM.

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    74
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by newbi
    P.S. the above system HELPS to distinguish fakes and genuines... but it doesn't prevent people from buying fakes.. (because you can't see the serial number and even if you can you dunno if the serial number is valid or not)
    Exactly, the system can't stop people from BUYING fakes, so there is no point to it.

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Heaven
    Posts
    719
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    That is a very good idea.

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Cannock, UK
    Posts
    2,908
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Anderson
    Exactly, the system can't stop people from BUYING fakes, so there is no point to it.
    there's a difference between intentionally buying a fake and being conned by being sold a fake when you want a real one.

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    78
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Anderson
    Exactly, the system can't stop people from BUYING fakes, so there is no point to it.
    not really, u see, alot of people here have posted in BF about if they have bought fake or not..

    if we have a method that can prove if a racket is fake or not 100%, then it acutally prevents people from buying fake in a way, because then, the person will know not to get rackets from the place where he got the last racket.. at least it will "discourage" these fakes

    as we all know, fakes nowadays are getting better and better at imitating.. sooner or later.. there will be "perfect fakes" around.. and these "security features" on the racket itself will become less and less effective..

    this is why i suggested a system like this.. where these "security features" are not on the racket itself.. but something the genuine companies can CONTROL ... they can certainly control the serial number databases of their online website if system is implemented correctly... this, is something fake manufactures cannot imitate.

    conversely, if there is no certain way to distinguish a fake and a genuine,
    we might mistaken some genuine sellers as fake sellers or vice versa.... and that can create quite a big mess..

    and IF people want to buy fake intentionally, they can be sure to know where to get them with the system also i guess.....
    Last edited by newbi; 12-15-2004 at 04:15 AM.

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    205
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    this is kinda of a good idea but it will prove to be a hassle..

  7. #7
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Singapore, Toa Payoh
    Posts
    232
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Neil Nicholls
    there's a difference between intentionally buying a fake and being conned by being sold a fake when you want a real one.
    well thats true.... however if thats the case.... Yonex will have to spend more money... do coding for the website make a website for different country distribution code.... and the thing is not everyone have internet at home even 99% of the population in the world shuld have... thus this idea will only bring:

    1) More charges to our racket
    2) More hassle

    the benefits is:

    1) Able to distinguish a conman

  8. #8
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    74
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Neil Nicholls
    there's a difference between intentionally buying a fake and being conned by being sold a fake when you want a real one.
    What I meant was that this system couldn't prevent unwary consumers from unintentionally buying fakes because of conning.

    And I still think this system isn of no value and impractical. If you need to ask whether you've bought a real racket, why buy it in the first place even though you were in doubt? (You could say he/she was conned into buying one, but then if one is alert enough to doubt the authenticity of the racket after buying, then why still buy it?)

  9. #9
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    66
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    this system will not prevent people from figuring out how the serial number is derived and inputting all of it and hogged the accounts. so even if one bought a real racket, their serial number might be occupied.

  10. #10
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    here
    Posts
    15
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    This reminds me of the huge CS: CZ frenzy that went on when it was released. Some people got the leaked version ahead of the release date and registered with fake numbers. It turned out the numbers weren't so "fake" after all since people with those numbers couldn't register. The helpline was horrible and the consumers found out that its a lot easier to simply register with fake numbers themselves.

    I don't know about you guys, but I hate product registration. They tell you they won't send unsolicitated mail, but they do anyway... If I already know that I bought an authentic racket because I bought it from an authorized Yonex retailer (which all of you should be doing in the first place) why would I bother registering?

    Also, considering that some country's Yonex websites haven't been updated in YEARS, would Yonex be willing to shell out loads of money to satisfy the small percentage of people who were too cheap to buy at retail price like the rest of us? I'd be pretty unhappy if Yonex rackets cost $5 more to all of us because a handful of people were too cheap to buy at a retailer in the first place.

  11. #11
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    New York, US
    Posts
    10,283
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The idea has good intention, however:

    1. If buying a 2nd hand racket, as the serial # is already there (w/o the scratchable protection), how I am going to tell whether it's a fake or real, w/o having logging on line?

    2. The fakes can simple use the same "layer" trick, which makes the problem even worse:

    2.1 Fake seller can "proudly" refuse to release serial # info on ebay, as they can say, "how could i know with it being covered???"

    2.2 When you purchase 1 online, you won't find out it's fake or not, until u register. What's the point then? You already paid, and being robbed...

  12. #12
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    78
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    how could they register with fake numbers when the numbers contain in the database only contains numbers on rackets that were actually made?

    oh btw, people can't "hog" all the serial numbers.. because there is silvery layer.. if its scratched off but was selling as a brand new racket.. then ppl will know not to buy it..

  13. #13
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    78
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LazyBuddy
    The idea has good intention, however:

    1. If buying a 2nd hand racket, as the serial # is already there (w/o the scratchable protection), how I am going to tell whether it's a fake or real, w/o having logging on line?

    2. The fakes can simple use the same "layer" trick, which makes the problem even worse:

    2.1 Fake seller can "proudly" refuse to release serial # info on ebay, as they can say, "how could i know with it being covered???"

    2.2 When you purchase 1 online, you won't find out it's fake or not, until u register. What's the point then? You already paid, and being robbed...

    1. maybe they could post a screenshot of their racket.. and a screen shot of the page ? (since the page contains serial number and type of racket and the owner's name) i m sure most of people have email nowadays ... thats if the transaction isnt based on online (tell ur friend to send u the screen shots by email!)

    but buying 2nd hand racket is never easy even now.. u take even more risk of getting a fake than a real.. for one, the heat shrink plastic handle cover is gone (so far i dont see any fake could imitate YET, or they can now already?)...

    2.1 u have a good point.. i never really thought about ebay.. but people can make up anything on ebay even now anyways.. since they dont own a store (most of them).. but only individuals

    2.2 well think about this.. if i purchase 1 online from a site or a person that sells large volume of rackets.. and we have a bullet proof method to distinguish fake or not.. IF the person is selling fake.. that saves hundreds of other ppl from buying from him

    on the other hand.. if we cant be sure if a racket is fake or not.. other people might not believe u.. cuz they might just think u have something against the seller or sth..

    at least the system gives some hard "proof" on a racket is fake or not
    Last edited by newbi; 12-15-2004 at 03:27 PM.

  14. #14
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    35,948
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    the intention of the thread is good. ie. to find a robust way to distinguish if a racket is genuine or fake.

    however, the reality is that while it may not be an impossible thing to do, it will be tough and potentially expensive to implement.

    imho, any type of textual identifier will be tough to make unique. the serial number that Yonex is currently using is hardly robust, we are already seeing fakers able to imitate it pretty closely.

    a serial number with a scratch-off protection is essentially textual identification. all fakers need to do is to get a few of them and figure out the pattern as we already did in the serial number thread. sooner or later they will catch up with Yonex.

    are there anybody among us with solid knowledge of digital security? i believe if we can embed a small (ie. cheap) digital chip in each yonex racket that contains some form of encrypted information of the racket, and only Yonex has the ability to encrypt and decrypt the information, that will make it robust. all Yonex racket then will have to be accompanied by this chip that only Yonex can manufacture. if we plug the chip into a USB device into the computer, the user can then connect to the Yonex HQ to verify the racket.

    of course, the problem still remains and that is if a customer is at the badminton shop, how would he be able to verify that the racket that he is about to pay for is genuine?

  15. #15
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    78
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kwun
    a serial number with a scratch-off protection is essentially textual identification. all fakers need to do is to get a few of them and figure out the pattern as we already did in the serial number thread. sooner or later they will catch up with Yonex.
    as i suggested earlier.. the way of generating these serial number must be totally random (no patterns. no nothing)

    for eg.. a digit can contain all alphanumeric symbols (36 permutation)
    so if a serial number consist 6 digits, there will be 36^6 permutation.. and thats quite a big number or if necessary add 1 or 2 more digits.. permutation goes up exponentially (is yonex using this already? cuz i never really checked the serial number thread)

    of course, fake companies can use bruteforce methods on the yonex website to try to find valid serial numbers.. but these can all be avoid with a good implement of online system

    wat i m trying to say is that computer security can be much more reliable than hardware (racket) security (eg. engraved serial number.. etc) ..

    well, i m not saying my method is bulletproof or anything.. but maybe its a step a forward to the right direction.. (just an abstract idea afterall)

    and the chip idea is acutally pretty good =) but it might screws up the chip because when playing badminton, racket can experience quite a bit of vibrations..

    very well, mayb if we continue on the discussion, we can find a very good way to eliminate or at least discourage these fakes! i will check back the thread later =)
    Last edited by newbi; 12-15-2004 at 04:11 PM.

  16. #16
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    35,948
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by newbi
    well, i m not saying my method is bulletproof or anything.. but maybe its a step a forward to the right direction.. (just an abstract idea afterall)

    and the chip idea is acutally pretty good =) but it might screws up the chip because when playing badminton, racket can experience quite a bit of vibrations..

    very well, mayb if we continue on the discussion, we can find a very good way to eliminate or at least discourage these fakes! i will check back the thread later =)
    Yonex should totally hire us as consultants...

    i proposed the chip instead of textual for a couple of reasons.

    a digital chip is very difficult to replicate. almost impossible to reverse engineer such a chip unless one is equipped with very expensive equipment. ones that fakers are surely not willing to pay for. furthermore, a digital chip can store much more information than text. a 1024 bit key can be easily stored and then read out electronically.

    and a small chip can be quite cheap to produce, it may add dollar or two to the cost of the racket, but if Yonex cares enough to do it, they may justify the cost. there is also the cost of developing such a chip that Yonex also need to take into account as well.

    as for the physical integrity of the chip, the most logical location to hide it will be the racket handle, the most space available as well as the place that sees the least physical impact.

  17. #17
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    78
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kwun
    Yonex should totally hire us as consultants...

    a digital chip is very difficult to replicate. almost impossible to reverse engineer such a chip unless one is equipped with very expensive equipment. ones that fakers are surely not willing to pay for. furthermore, a digital chip can store much more information than text. a 1024 bit key can be easily stored and then read out electronically.

    and a small chip can be quite cheap to produce, it may add dollar or two to the cost of the racket, but if Yonex cares enough to do it, they may justify the cost. there is also the cost of developing such a chip that Yonex also need to take into account as well.

    haha very good! i totally agree on digital chip can provide more space for information storage.

    as for the buying brand new racket from shop part.. yonex could introduce a seal on top of where u plug the usb (or other adaptor) .. this seal should be a 1 time seal.. (u know bottle drinks have vaccum seal, sth similar here).. kinda sends a message to customer like.. if the seal if broken.. they might risk buying a fake racket or already registered racket..

    another reason that yonex should implement this system (chip or wat not, as long as security is not only based on the racket itself) is that this will encourage people to buy brand new rackets instead of second hand.. since for second hand the seal is already broken (buyer taking more risk of buying fake products).. these "adv. technology dependent" security features should acutally increase yonex's revenue...!

    the better fakes become (assuming they can make a "lookalike" fake chip, that doesnt register), the more people will depend on these improved security features.. and the less people will buy 2nd hand racket.. hence have to buy new rackets........ talking about "jeung gai jau gai" .. (using other's plan as advantage to own plan)

    and yes.. should definately hire us as consultants
    Last edited by newbi; 12-15-2004 at 08:39 PM.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Fake or Genuine?
    By Many Ch0icez in forum Identify Fake Racket (Price/Source/Serial/Photos are required)
    Replies: 4
    : 04-01-2010, 09:19 PM
  2. Please tell me its genuine or fake
    By zhishengtian in forum Identify Fake Racket (Price/Source/Serial/Photos are required)
    Replies: 2
    : 08-05-2009, 06:27 AM
  3. How to distinguish real or fake yy racket?
    By alex_fung1980 in forum Identify Fake Racket (Price/Source/Serial/Photos are required)
    Replies: 2
    : 03-28-2009, 11:43 AM
  4. How to distinguish a fake racket??
    By Swing and miss in forum Identify Fake Racket (Price/Source/Serial/Photos are required)
    Replies: 13
    : 12-13-2007, 12:39 PM
  5. Fake/genuine airblade
    By dbeh753 in forum Identify Fake Racket (Price/Source/Serial/Photos are required)
    Replies: 5
    : 11-27-2002, 09:11 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •