Results 1 to 17 of 66
Thread: Overall Weight vs Balance
06-29-2004, 12:50 AM #1
Who say Ti10 is head heavy? It is only 295 mm balance point?
Who say Ti10 is head heavy? It is only 295 mm balance point.
This is with BG85 string and original thin plastic G5 grip.
Other rackets like Armortecs, MP90, ISO 900, Ti SP, MP88, MP77 are mostly 300-310 mm with original thin grip and string.
Actually, my friend Ti10 with a thicker grip, looks head light.
Unless the measurements is done at the handle not balance point of racket.
One thing is sure, it is stiff, but quite light.
Anyone can comment on this?
06-29-2004, 01:23 AM #2
How do you guys measure balance point? do you guys measure it from the bottom of the grip?
BTW, my Ti-10 2U/G4 with 1 layer of Yonex super graps got exactly same balance point as yours!!! (I measured it from the bottom of my grip)
Last edited by Feng_MP-100; 06-29-2004 at 01:27 AM.
06-29-2004, 01:33 AM #3Originally Posted by Feng_MP-100
295mm is at the head heavy side, but not too head heavy.
Normally, I consider:
Less than 280mm: Head-Light
290mm and more: Head Heavy
06-29-2004, 11:45 AM #4
Might be the stiffness tricked us. Seriously, how many ppl bring ruler into the gym?
06-29-2004, 12:52 PM #5
06-29-2004, 12:53 PM #6
Didn't you bring a ruler/tape-measure, LB? Once to mark the spots on the gym floor?
06-29-2004, 02:06 PM #7Originally Posted by cooler
06-29-2004, 02:08 PM #8Originally Posted by wood_22_chuck
06-29-2004, 02:29 PM #9Originally Posted by wood_22_chuck
(case in point: 2 years ago at mount royal college where the badminton lines are painted beige color to match the hardwood floor and only 1.5 cm wide, a provincial tournament was held there and no players made complaints about the lines. It seem the players 'know' where the line suppose to be)
06-29-2004, 10:03 PM #10
The balance point in badminton racquets is, by itself, a meaningless measurement. A 2U Ti-10 with the same balance point as a similar 4U racquet will have very different "effective" balance points from each other. Also it is possible for a badminton racquet with a static balance point of 310mm to have an "effective" balance point that is less head-heavy than one with a balance point of 295mm, like the 2U Ti-10. If you have a 2U racquet make sure the static balance point, with strings and original grip, is no more than 285mm. You can get away with head-heavy light racquets but not with head-heavy heavy racquets. This is exactly how Yonex is positioning its Amortec series. If I were to buy an Amortec racquet I would go for the 4U and not the 3U, because of the 4U's more "effective" balance point. Likewise, even heavy racquets that are evenly balanced are "effectively" head-heavy. The racquet with the best "effective" balance point is the Gosen. How they do it, I still am trying to figure out.
06-29-2004, 10:13 PM #11Originally Posted by taneepak
Also, can you explain why the 3U rackets has less "effective balance point" than the 4U rackets?
06-29-2004, 11:44 PM #12
I was confused about people calling the ti-10 head heavy as well. I`ve never measured the balance point of any of my rackets, but in comparison, the ti-10 FEELS head light. I grip with the original grip at the bottom followed by a couple layers of undertape and then a gosen towel grip.
06-30-2004, 12:38 AM #13Originally Posted by MarkinJapan
I think, before AT series racquets came out, 295mm is considered as head-heavy. But now, a lot of racquets are over 300mm, so I would just say 295mm is head-heavy, but not so much of it.
06-30-2004, 12:55 AM #14
Where to buy undertape?
06-30-2004, 02:03 AM #15Originally Posted by bluejeff
06-30-2004, 02:42 AM #16Originally Posted by bluejeff
Re the second, lets say a 4U racquet weighs 84 gram with strings and original grip and has a static balance point of 300mm, and another racquet 3U weighs 89gm with strings and original grip and an identical static point of 300mm. The crude "effective" balance weight of the 4U racquet is actually 252 (84x3m) and for the 3U is a higher 267 (89x3m). This is why the 3U is more head-heavy than the 4U even if both have identical static balance point. For the 3U racquet to play the same as the 4U racquet, the 3U racquet should have a static balance point of 283mm.
06-30-2004, 02:04 PM #17
Oh, you were talking about the "real weight" than the "relative weight".
a 4U racket has 80grams in weight, Called it "X", original balance point 300mm
a 3U racket has 85grams in weight, Called it "Y", original balance point 300mm
a set of badminton strings has 2 grams in weight, Called it "S"
an overgrip has 4 grams in weight, called it "G"
New Balance point:
S+G+X < S+G+Y
Because the original weight is X < Y, so X will shift back more.
So, I was just confused with your wordings... ..... we are all good.
By avsatec in forum Racket Recommendation / ComparisonReplies: 12: 01-20-2012, 09:17 AM
By Nuetronist in forum Badminton Rackets / EquipmentReplies: 3: 09-04-2009, 10:27 AM
By 77suns in forum Techniques / TrainingReplies: 9: 11-30-2007, 10:07 PM
By TurDz in forum GripReplies: 2: 11-28-2005, 01:12 PM
By frank in forum Badminton Rackets / EquipmentReplies: 7: 05-02-2001, 08:56 AM