Results 171 to 187 of 753
Thread: Yonex Ti-10 Reviews
08-13-2008, 12:52 AM #171
If Ti.10 is the same or slightly better than AT900T, given the significant price differences, it might be more valuable for us to buy Ti.10 instead of AT900T.
Do you guys agree with me?
Ti.10 yellow /silver or 2008 dark purple Ti.10 will be the way to go.
08-13-2008, 10:40 AM #172
11-16-2008, 11:25 AM #173
First time Ti10 user
Wow did u guys notice this thread was start since 2005
And people are still giving awesome feedback about the Ti10.
Well I just got mine from racquet world in pertama today, the purple coloured one.
Didn't read any reviews. Just went in and tested out different racquets.
Love at first swing (and not too expensive too).
Love the way it cuts through the air
Can't wait to see this baby in action.
Damn i wish wednesday would come faster.
11-16-2008, 11:35 AM #174
These review have encompassed all 3 generations of Ti-10; the old one, the yellow one, and now the purple one, and they are all amazing racquets.
11-17-2008, 02:43 AM #175
Just wondering why only BCL uses the Ti-10 in men's singles, i mean its all-rounder racket. It should be very good playing with it in singles.
11-17-2008, 04:11 AM #176
Conspiracy theory...if the new players keep using old racquets like T10, the fans are also not going to upgrade right?
On the other hand if everyone upgrades at once, it looks a bit fishy...
11-17-2008, 04:54 AM #177
i oso bought one from PC two weeks ago...
at such a reasonable price...this baby is worth your money...
my smash improve a lot since i used this racquet...
happy...banging my opponents....
11-17-2008, 06:55 AM #178
is this ti-10 good for both smashing and defence? How much did you buy the racquet from pertama complex?Which shop did you get it from?
11-17-2008, 09:08 AM #179
Bought mine for RM400 with strings (bg66) + grip + bag.
I didn't really spent too much time bargaining so u probably can get a much better price.
11-17-2008, 11:03 AM #180
Comparing Ti-10 and at900T (this still my favorite and main racket) or saber 10 is unfair since each type have own characteristic. But for price/performance ratio surely Ti-10 is recommended, nice racket from YY no matter what gen you have weakness only in painting job, too easy to chip
Last edited by issarakaya; 11-17-2008 at 11:06 AM.
11-17-2008, 11:30 AM #181
issarakaya, since you are a long time user of TI-10, perhaps you can advise on how high the string tension can go?
The guy at PC recommended 24 lbs which I think is way too low for a racquet of this range? I went with 25 lbs.
Advise from other long time users most welcomed.
11-18-2008, 07:30 AM #182
I dont know for sure but some member here use 28-30 lbs if i'm not wrong Looks @Dink racket review, he use 28lbs
Mine is 26X28 lbs but not too sure since the stringer using old machine (perhaps he dont calibrate often) Btw, tension is personal preference and i use BG66 Sharp....if you strung with other string type / brand tension might be different too.
11-18-2008, 10:35 AM #183
11-18-2008, 03:00 PM #184
11-18-2008, 05:08 PM #185
My experience in ti-10 3rd edition, is that is a very good racket. It is difficult to get used of it ( or this only my problem because i was always using armotec rackets). But when you do it is a very good racket.
I think is more an all-around racket, good in offense ( better if you have strong wrist ), in defence is good (not so good as arm900t that i was using before) the light head helps you to move the racket fast for forhand side to backhand side.
The racket is very good, i can say excelent for the price, it is a very good choise for players with good level.
11-18-2008, 05:10 PM #186
11-18-2008, 05:35 PM #187
By ants in forum Badminton Rackets / EquipmentReplies: 467: 04-06-2013, 10:47 AM
By bluejeff in forum Badminton Rackets / EquipmentReplies: 21: 11-25-2010, 06:25 AM
By ArcticZero in forum Racket Recommendation / ComparisonReplies: 8: 06-26-2007, 10:11 PM
By HounDz in forum Badminton Rackets / EquipmentReplies: 2: 10-04-2006, 05:17 AM
By apex00 in forum Badminton Rackets / EquipmentReplies: 2: 02-27-2006, 10:58 AM