User Tag List

Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    776
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Is the karakal sl-70 really that good or just light?

    My friend and I have been having an arguement about this racquet. I said that a racquet too light is almost useless to generate power without REALLY good technique but he says that it can produce momentum to produce speed and power. His power and technique are that of a low level intermidiate player, like me. Would this racquet be any good in singles or would an AT700 suffice? And who's right?
    Last edited by GunBlade008; 04-01-2005 at 07:49 PM.

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Montreal (514)
    Posts
    1,229
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GunBlade008
    My friend and I have been having an arguement about this racquet. I said that a racquet too light is almost useless to generate power without REALLY good technique but he says that it can produce momentum to produce speed and power. His power and technique are that of a low level intermidiate player, like me. Would this racquet be any good in singles or would an AT700 suffice? And who's right?
    None of you are right because it depends on people. Some people generate more power with light racquet (head light) while other pack more punch with heavy (head heavy) racquet.

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    776
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    hmmm, well rite now, he's using a 703 Carbo-knight and his smashes are slightly faster with a at700. in ur opinion, if you were going for singles, which racquet would you prefer? At700 or Sl-70?

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Montreal (514)
    Posts
    1,229
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GunBlade008
    hmmm, well rite now, he's using a 703 Carbo-knight and his smashes are slightly faster with a at700. in ur opinion, if you were going for singles, which racquet would you prefer? At700 or Sl-70?
    Well he seems to smash better with a head heavier racquet?

    Then his choice would be AT700 over Karakal sl-70.

    But hmm.. there again, what if he tries MP88 or Mp99 or Ti-10... Its all good in theory but will he perform better?

Similar Threads

  1. WTB karakal SL70..or.. VERY LIGHT RACQUET
    By n0tcreatlve in forum Buy & Sell - Read the rules sticky before you post
    Replies: 10
    : 01-01-2010, 01:55 PM
  2. good website for karakal or black knight
    By cyrusso in forum Market Place
    Replies: 0
    : 08-15-2009, 09:10 AM
  3. Yonex Ti 1 Light - any good for a beginner
    By dan68 in forum Racket Recommendation / Comparison
    Replies: 2
    : 01-02-2009, 10:45 AM
  4. Karakal sl 70, fukuda and other light racquets?
    By Suddet in forum Racket Recommendation / Comparison
    Replies: 0
    : 03-24-2007, 12:50 PM
  5. What's good strings/tension for Karakal SL-70
    By sHaUnTiZzLe in forum Badminton String
    Replies: 5
    : 03-12-2007, 10:32 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •