Mp99 vs Armotec 800 OFF? Singles?

Discussion in 'Racket Recommendation / Comparison' started by RaymondLin, Apr 28, 2005.

  1. RaymondLin

    RaymondLin Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2004
    Messages:
    71
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Student/Badminton Player
    Location:
    Canada/Taiwan
    From your guys opinions which racket do you think is better for singles?
    MP99 or Armotec 800 OFF?
    In my opinion both of them feel sort of similar when I play with them.
    Although I feel that Armotec 800 OFF is lighter than Mp99...
    What do you guys recommend or think?:p


    Raymond
     
  2. Akatsuki

    Akatsuki Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2005
    Messages:
    101
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    USA
    Yeah, I would also like to know



     
  3. lonelyk3

    lonelyk3 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    santa clara
    yes, same here

    i have played with both at800 off and mp99
    in my opinion, at800 is better since its easier for me to control.
    but what do you guys recommend :confused:
     
  4. RaymondLin

    RaymondLin Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2004
    Messages:
    71
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Student/Badminton Player
    Location:
    Canada/Taiwan
    anyone?:confused: I would like to know what other people think
     
  5. Dave18

    Dave18 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2004
    Messages:
    456
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Toronto
    Each player is different so you really can't ask that question.

    But I think AT800 OF is lighter overall giving a faster reaction. Also, it's light and more powerful than mp99. But I still prefer mp99 for control.
     
  6. ants

    ants Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2002
    Messages:
    13,202
    Likes Received:
    51
    Occupation:
    Entrepreneur , Modern Nomad
    Location:
    Malaysian Citizen of the World
    I prefer MP99 for singles. Besides that AT700 will be another alternative.
     
  7. Woven

    Woven Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2004
    Messages:
    288
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    beggar
    Location:
    Sydney and JKT
    i would say mp99 for singles and even for doubles. AT 800 OFF is too head heavy thus cant be easily manuverable.
     
  8. SteveStanley

    SteveStanley Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2004
    Messages:
    489
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    USA
    I guess the answers would vary depending on your style.

    But, for me, I would prefer AT800OF, I'm an offensive player, when I play single I mainly just want to set up and when the opponent lifts, I just kill it with jump smash, I play singles almost like I play doubles. AT800OF gives me lots of power when I smash, more powerful than MP99, that's the key for me. And, it also allows me to do faster drives just like in doubles. Both rackets have great control.
     
  9. Brave_Turtle

    Brave_Turtle Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2003
    Messages:
    1,230
    Likes Received:
    1
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Montreal (514)
    How many Top 20 MS use mp99 compared to AT800 OF? I haven't seen a top MS player playign with AT800 OF yet, but MP99 has been used and still being used by alot of them.

    Personally I would choose MP99 for both single and double: 2U for single and 3U for double (makes a big difference). But there again, it will depend on YOU.
     
  10. pandee720

    pandee720 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2004
    Messages:
    143
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Los Angeles, California
    my friend moved from mp-99 and armortec-800 OF and he said he likes armortec more...
     
  11. Hawkefire

    Hawkefire Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2005
    Messages:
    23
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Waterloo, ON
    ive played with both raquets and id say that the MP99 has more power but the AT800 has more controll
     
  12. Kai91

    Kai91 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2004
    Messages:
    232
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Singapore, Toa Payoh
    Coz Yonex claims that AT800 is "for double use". That's y they didnt sponsor MS players with AT800. They only gave AT700 to MS players:cool:
     
  13. FEND.

    FEND. Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,786
    Likes Received:
    3
    Occupation:
    Full Time Badmintoncentral.com/forums camper. Part
    Location:
    Perth, Australia
    They also gave AT700 to doubles... can't remember who but one china WD player was using it. How can you forget that after I slammed the point into your msn window... geez.
     
  14. pb_aznstyle

    pb_aznstyle Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2005
    Messages:
    91
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Edmonton AB, Canada
    I use a mp100 2u and I find it more forgiving and manuverable than the armortec 800off (3u). over all the raquet is lighter but in play it feels heavier than my 2u mp100, proabably because of it's head heaviness. The armortec was supposed to be strung at 24-22 but my mp100's strings strung at supposedly the same tension felt much tighter and the feeling seemed much more solid. I could feel the armortec make the bird fly faster but i barely felt anything compared to my mp100.
     
  15. virusvoodoo

    virusvoodoo Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2004
    Messages:
    914
    Likes Received:
    62
    Occupation:
    court mopper
    Location:
    USA

    That is correct. Candra Wijaya was using it during the 2003 World Championships Final before switching to the AT-800DE. Also, Nova Widianto was using the AT-700 racquet during the 2004 Yonex All England Open Mixed Semi-final. I don't know if he is still using it or not.
     
  16. Kai91

    Kai91 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2004
    Messages:
    232
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Singapore, Toa Payoh
    They started using AT700 before the existence of AT800s?:p Anyway, like always Yonex stated AT700 on the neutral side, therefore they must have sponsored them with AT700 before the AT800s?

    :D
     
  17. Fusion_M8

    Fusion_M8 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2003
    Messages:
    93
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    I.T/Admin
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia.
    In my opinion, its neither. Its how well your level of skill and experience is in using the racket as a tool to win your game regardless.

    Is there such thing as a shuttle for singles and a shuttle for doubles?? I think not. But you do have shuttles that have different weights and fly at different speeds, but both can be used for singles or doubles. Ditto with the rackets.

    If you used the AT800 OFF to play a game of singles its not like you walked into a gun fight with a steak knife...

    I recommend to you to try both rackets and use the one you feel most comfortable with. Don't let marketing hype affect your concentration and enjoyment of badminton. :)
     
    #17 Fusion_M8, May 11, 2005
    Last edited: May 11, 2005
  18. HKChua

    HKChua Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2005
    Messages:
    722
    Likes Received:
    2
    Occupation:
    Software Architect
    Location:
    Singapore
    But... if you walk into the badminton court with a gun, you don't need any racket, they say you win. :D Just kidding!

    Thanks.
     
  19. Fusion_M8

    Fusion_M8 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2003
    Messages:
    93
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    I.T/Admin
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia.
    Not unless they pull out a rocket launcher... :D
     
  20. |R|S

    |R|S Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2002
    Messages:
    418
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Singapore
    sony using at800of in sudirman! changed from mp99!

    well... this says a lot doesnt it? :D
     

Share This Page