User Tag List

Page 4 of 9 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 LastLast
Results 52 to 68 of 150
  1. #52
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    61
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Revisited: Increasing the Height of the Net

    Time passes.

    The introduction of an idea revisited.

    Individuals quick to condemn gain opportunity for increased depth of thought and wisdom through the passage of the sands.

    A new scoring system initially crucified by the masses shows light of acceptance.

    Xenophobia, complacency and self-entitlement reflect poorly on us not only as citizens but as sporting figures and as society.

    Long persecuted for its popularity and authenticity as a real sport, shall its players ignominously refuse to open up its ways to inspection and scrutiny?

    Are masqueraders who would cover up poor defence with offencive lobs unaware how transparently they are seen through?

    Isn't it about time badminton accommodated the modern athlete by increasing the height of its net by 4cm?

  2. #53
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Ottawa
    Posts
    1,110
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The height of the net was not determined based on some calculation involving the mean height of the players involved. It was pretty much arbitrarily chosen. For example, why are volleyball nets so high? Tennis nets so low? Soccer nets so large yet hockey nets so small? No reason, they were just chosen to be like that. Perhaps it was easier to manufacture them in those dimensions.

    The thing is, these nets have all already been manufactured. To change the dimensions now would be pretty costly if we had to replace or modify all existing nets with new ones. A cost that will be too high considering the lack of truly useful benefits. At least the new scoring system doesn't cost anything in terms of equipment replacement.

    Perhaps what you should do is create an offshoot sport like speedminton. I've got an idea: maybe you can attach the net to trees instead of posts, and call the game treeminton. As time passes, the trees will grow, and so will the height of the net. You'll even have seasonal variations - such falling leaves in the fall for extra challenge. Watch out, I'm sure it'll be the next big thing!

  3. #54
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Holland
    Posts
    3,977
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    What would 4cm change? smashes will just go flatter, but still just as hard....
    a delciate shot, like a deceptive drop, will be much slower...

    also, I ahven't really seen an argument why it woudl help...what does it change?

    also, to comment on your starting post. I think your take on (professinal) singles is wrought and wrong.,..
    You look at them playign and you onyl see smashes? look better..

  4. #55
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    843
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by quisitor
    Time passes.

    The introduction of an idea revisited.

    Individuals quick to condemn gain opportunity for increased depth of thought and wisdom through the passage of the sands.

    A new scoring system initially crucified by the masses shows light of acceptance.

    Xenophobia, complacency and self-entitlement reflect poorly on us not only as citizens but as sporting figures and as society.

    Long persecuted for its popularity and authenticity as a real sport, shall its players ignominously refuse to open up its ways to inspection and scrutiny?

    Are masqueraders who would cover up poor defence with offencive lobs unaware how transparently they are seen through?

    Isn't it about time badminton accommodated the modern athlete by increasing the height of its net by 4cm?
    Completely and absolutely disagree with any form of height increase of the net. It is xenophobic, complacent and self-entitled for anybody to suggest this.

    Not everybody has grown taller and certainly not everybody is tall.

  5. #56
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Edmonton, AB. Canada
    Posts
    44
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Are you suggesting that taller people have more of an advantage in Badminton? I hadn't noticed taller people win more games.

    Buy a shoe 4cm higher negate your 4cm higher net? Why stop at 4 cm? Why not as high as volleyball net?

  6. #57
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    779
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Leveraging new technologies to improve line judging...YES
    Increasing the height of the net...BIG NO NO....or just dun call it badminton anymore.

    We use new technologies to make badminton a better and easier sport to play, not to make it harder. Besides, there is still plenty of areas that can be improved such as plastic shuttlecock, lighting design, ...etc

  7. #58
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    843
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HappyPlato
    Are you suggesting that taller people have more of an advantage in Badminton? I hadn't noticed taller people win more games.

    Buy a shoe 4cm higher negate your 4cm higher net? Why stop at 4 cm? Why not as high as volleyball net?
    Cute idea. Got to try it at a volleyball net if I have a chance, it would be hilarious considering the size of the courts.

  8. #59
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Vancouver, Canada
    Posts
    294
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EastDevil
    Cute idea. Got to try it at a volleyball net if I have a chance, it would be hilarious considering the size of the courts.
    Also have six players on each side so that way more people can play at the same time.

  9. #60
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    843
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pedro22
    Also have six players on each side so that way more people can play at the same time.
    Not a good idea considering clashing of rackets. 2 maximum since not like to have smashes.

  10. #61
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Holland
    Posts
    3,977
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    off course you should also be able to jump-serve from the backline. tossing up the birdy.
    and then 'set up' players for a netkill.

    cover the rackets in PU to prevent players getting impaled on each others rackets?

  11. #62
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Burnaby, BC, Canada
    Posts
    3,511
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quisitor,

    Instead of changing the sport to suit your circumstances, why don't you try adopting new tactics to beating your opponents? It's more challenging that way. There are many ways to get around 'the wall', you just need to get more creative.

  12. #63
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Basement Boiler Room
    Posts
    22,118
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    height change does not equate to modernization.

  13. #64
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    aujerbajan
    Posts
    1,159
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cooler
    height change does not equate to modernization.
    new rackets, shoes, NSS (debateable), better training techniques and more durable birds = modernization . net change is not a good idea, would NBA raise the hoop? it would make dunks less spectacular and lower the score in games.

  14. #65
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    61
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Idea 1a: The number 4

    Some good humour here.
    That's all I'm able to conclude from many of the forum users here unless logic skills have become more of a premium than crude oil.

    But also some advancements in thought here.

    I completely agree 4 cm is arbitrary, may not be of significant enough difference to warrant discussion and is not important.

    So why would anyone loudly decree for a specific adjustment to the height of the net down to the very centimetre?

    An act of madness perhaps?


    (On a side note: To those suggesting players would simply wear shoes 4 cm higher to negate the intended effect-- whisper that quietly lest you have the badminton shoe police all over you declaring you an infidel and commenting on ankle injuries -- also not all of us want to wear pumps to the nines while we're playing-- tsk tsk Plato's probably rolling around in his grave at this idea)

  15. #66
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    France
    Posts
    146
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by quisitor
    Some good humour here.
    That's all I'm able to conclude from many of the forum users here unless logic skills have become more of a premium than crude oil.

    But also some advancements in thought here.

    I completely agree 4 cm is arbitrary, may not be of significant enough difference to warrant discussion and is not important.

    So why would anyone loudly decree for a specific adjustment to the height of the net down to the very centimetre?

    An act of madness perhaps?


    (On a side note: To those suggesting players would simply wear shoes 4 cm higher to negate the intended effect-- whisper that quietly lest you have the badminton shoe police all over you declaring you an infidel and commenting on ankle injuries -- also not all of us want to wear pumps to the nines while we're playing-- tsk tsk Plato's probably rolling around in his grave at this idea)
    One of the main side effect of increasing the net height is the game will be slowed down. Is that the right direction for the badminton to take ?

  16. #67
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    513
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chai
    One of the main side effect of increasing the net height is the game will be slowed down. Is that the right direction for the badminton to take ?
    Which means that the game will become longer, even with the NSS.

    Since the whole point of switching to the NSS is to shorten the match duration, increasing the net height would be counter-'productive'.

  17. #68
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    61
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Idea 1b: The number 3

    Shortening match duration sounds like an excellent idea!

    Upon feedback from many in this thread-- increasing the height of the net is not a good idea.

    So I think it's about time badminton changed the height of the net to 90 cm at the centre of the court and approximately 91.4 cm at the doubles sidelines. 3 feet 0 inches sounds about right to me and should allow a more diverse group of people to smash the bird and enjoy the game! It will also have the effect of keeping the matches shorter!

    Never let it be said that quisitor does not look out for his fellow man.

    Isn't it about time badminton accommodated the diversity of athletes by changing the height of the net to 3 feet?

Page 4 of 9 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    : 04-13-2010, 03:51 PM
  2. how to return defensive push shots chest height to head height
    By logicalguy in forum Techniques / Training
    Replies: 3
    : 09-24-2009, 05:14 AM
  3. increasing badminton's popularity
    By Mini Me in forum General Forum
    Replies: 18
    : 05-15-2009, 01:48 PM
  4. Increasing height
    By hjuvane in forum Chit-Chat
    Replies: 4
    : 02-24-2005, 04:00 AM
  5. Increasing the height of ur jump
    By Hail2Fire in forum Techniques / Training
    Replies: 21
    : 11-22-2004, 05:01 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •