Results 1 to 17 of 29
Thread: Broken Racket Yonex Warranty?
11-07-2005, 05:31 AM #1
Broken Racket Yonex Warranty?
I was just stringing a Yonex MP88 following the new yonex stringing pattern
at 22 lbs.
The result was that the racket broke at the 14th hole. It broke while I was nearly finished with stringing the crosses. The racket haven't any signs of damage form a previous crash so I'm a little bit stunned. I was stringing quiet a few rackets yet and I haven't found a n error on my side.
Now I have 2 questions:
First. How is Yonex warranty working? Is it easy to send it in directly to yonex and get a new one. Since it's clearly a production problem.Or have to be there any precautions?
I'm living in Germany and the racket was also bought there. (Have a similiar problem with my MP99)
Second. Surely the new stringing pattern introduces more stress on the lower part of the racket (near the T-Joint). I'm not sure but I think the upper part is more flexible and therefor is able to handle the stress better through flexing. Is the new stringing pattern obsolet?
11-07-2005, 07:48 AM #2
I am not a stringer, but I thought the 'new' stringing pattern was for AT800 and Nanospeed series racquets as they have extra grommets. I would have thought that you would simply damage a grommet though, not break the racquet at that tension.
Originally Posted by baumbaer
11-07-2005, 08:04 AM #3
they should provide replacement. A broken racket during stringing is reconizable.. You can try the agent or the website.
11-07-2005, 08:57 AM #4Originally Posted by baumbaer
1) make sure you have the right distribution code and it is still in warrenty.
2) contact yonex in germany or in eu.
3) they will give you a instruction to to send in for replacement.
3) they will give you a instruction
11-07-2005, 10:49 AM #5
not that simple this time.
1.warranty had expired (unless it was a recent purchase of an older model)
2. if it was truly a manufacturer defect, mp88 is out of production. Your dealer has to search for other retailers for mp88 replacement if yonex agree to factory defect.
3. since u had clashed before, yonex's technican can spot that.
11-07-2005, 11:31 AM #6Originally Posted by baumbaer
11-07-2005, 11:36 AM #7
Thanks for all your replies I will talk to yonex this week and then we'll see.
Originally Posted by LazyBuddy
11-07-2005, 11:44 AM #8Originally Posted by baumbaer
11-07-2005, 11:53 AM #9Originally Posted by cooler
11-07-2005, 12:06 PM #10
The Yonex UK racquet brochure says the max stringing tension for MP88 mains is 19lbs, and crosses is 21lbs. Wouldn't trying to string it at 22lbs invalidate the warranty? That is for the 4U version anyway.......
11-07-2005, 02:17 PM #11Originally Posted by cooler
when did that happen?
It's in the 2005 Yonex UK catalogue (well pamphlet )
11-07-2005, 03:39 PM #12Originally Posted by Neil Nicholls
The red mp88 were discontinued for more than 1 year already. The blue on is still in the 05 catalog.
11-07-2005, 03:45 PM #13
Could you post a picture on it.. I do not understand what "NEW" pattern you've used? There isn't any new pattern for MP-rackets I know of..
11-07-2005, 04:10 PM #14
If you send it back and Yonex find a manufacture defect they will most likely send a replacement blue MP88, I know someone who got 2 old style red ones replaced with blue ones
11-07-2005, 04:29 PM #15Originally Posted by twobeer
I will post some pics tomorrow.
11-09-2005, 01:50 AM #16Originally Posted by baumbaer
11-09-2005, 02:59 AM #17Originally Posted by baumbaer
sorry to see the loss.
i noticed you are using an Eagnas machine.
the side supports are poorly designed and very very very prone to slipping. in normal situation when the supports are secure, the crack should not have occured. did you tighten the supports adequately?
By Yipom in forum Badminton Rackets / EquipmentReplies: 44: 09-05-2012, 03:12 PM
By Tommii in forum Broken RacketsReplies: 5: 03-06-2012, 06:10 PM
By alanwong76 in forum Broken RacketsReplies: 2: 10-23-2011, 06:13 AM
By clementyip in forum Broken RacketsReplies: 9: 01-04-2005, 08:23 AM
By jcb in forum Broken RacketsReplies: 3: 09-05-2002, 12:02 PM