Results 35 to 51 of 81
12-18-2005, 07:23 PM #35Originally Posted by CWB001
12-18-2005, 11:04 PM #36
Sometimes views expressed are just not enough. Maybe someone can do something about it?
12-18-2005, 11:14 PM #37
I agree, happend before with 5x7, will probably happen again.
As I have said previously it is not about making changes... it is about properly promoting the sport!
Originally Posted by badrad
12-18-2005, 11:17 PM #38
Thanks, don't you think we have already dicussed this, put forward our view points? Some people are just yes people!
Originally Posted by taneepak
12-18-2005, 11:38 PM #39
We're basically repeating the same thing over and over again so i didnt bother reading after page one so if we moved onto a new topic, forgive me.
Since it is evident that this new scoring system is not very popular in both the professional world and the amateur world, i think that IBF will change it back eventually.
I amcurrently trying to persuade my friends that badminton is challenging to both the mental and physical body but this new scoring system makes it like a wussier version of volleyball and brings it down to the standards of table tennis. Personally I am not a strong player and I generally become more offensive during my serve because I have nothing to loose. However, with this new scoring system, I feel intimidated to be offensive during the game in fear of a frame shot.
My main point is this. Badminton is already the second most popular sport in the world before this system. The badminton tournaments gain enough support as is to keep the sport favourable. Why change the fundamental rules of the game in order to make it even more friendly to the world?
12-19-2005, 12:01 AM #40Originally Posted by DinkAlot
12-19-2005, 06:06 AM #41Originally Posted by cooler
12-19-2005, 07:56 AM #42Originally Posted by manduki
12-19-2005, 09:37 AM #43
fret not, things that can not survive will die.Originally Posted by ccskaki
Taufik clearly expressed that he doesn't like the new scoring system at all. so did many other pros.
chinese national coach Li Yongbo made a very negative comment on the new scoring system (in chinese), he is that kind of guy who always means what he says and says what he means.
so much for responses from the pro line.
(after i finished what i felt like to write, i found it toooooo long, so i cut it into fragments, here you go)
12-19-2005, 09:38 AM #44
as for us, WHO CARES? ANYONE OF YOU ARE PLAYING THE NEW SCORING SYSTEM? none around me even bothered to give it a try.
IBF hasn't done anything positively impressive these years. all has been done is embarrassing themselves, the 7 point scoring system for example. and it came again in the form of 21 points.
and badminton is going to be kicked out of Olympus Games all thanks to IBF.
in fact, if IBF dies tomorrow, i'll still love this game, if not more; i'll still love the players, if not more; the players will still be playing, if not more and better. and the game will still be loved by many people, if not more.
SO, WHAT THE HECK DO WE NEED IBF AND WHAT THE HECK THEY ARE DOING THERE?
so much for complaining.
12-19-2005, 09:53 AM #45
First off all, as I stated before.. Some ideas can be refuted in theory and doesn't NEED to be tested.. Also if IBF really wanted to "trial" this new system.. Why start with the big toournaments? Why not make for example US (or whatever porblem "market" they try to address) trial it an if it works there maybe it could be considered internationally.. It doesn't make sense to start messing with things at the top level just for "fun"..
And why 21x3 as you indicated there are almost infinitive variations of scoring and who's to serve rules.. I don't think we need to try out each and every possible combination...At least not if we cannot say the 15x3 scoring is
a major problem!!
I agree with you that petitions, etc should be sent to the local IBF guys to make em know how we feel
Originally Posted by taneepak
12-19-2005, 10:12 AM #46
21-point scoring system kills the game
let's back to the point.
the main reason for the 21 point scoring system is a predictable game play time. and they are pretty wrong here.
as the most comparable game, tennis doesn't have a predictable game play time at all (men's long final (5th) set instead of tie break makes the game even longer now). what's worse, the four Grand Slams are all open-door. people don't mind even sitting in the rain in the midnight watching the game which they love, not knowing when it ends. that's the charm of the game. countless classic long-winded matches make the best part of tennis history.
people come across oceans and mountains to the game they like, people go away from the game they don't like even if it's delivered to door.
so, unpredictable game time ain't a problem for badminton at all. and don't blame the unpredictable game time when you failed to get more people love this game.
well, if you insist, that unpredictable game time IS INDEED a big problem, 21-point ain't the solution at all. here is the reason.
take football and basketball (NBA) for example. they have relatively more predictable game time. football two halves 90 minutes plus the break in between. additional 30 min and penalty kicking for no-draw games. for NBA 4 quarters 48 minutes plus 3 breaks, 6 full time-out and 2 short for each team. unlimited OT until there is a winner. it can easily go beyond 2 hours.
you see the difference?
yes, games have to be predictably LONG, not predictably SHORT.
you hardly find any game that is as short as half an hour. that simply doesn't make it a game: no enough time to get the audience into the game. even for snooker or billard, multi frames ensure long enough game time. it is kinda psycology thing. have you ever watched a movie that is one hour long (short)? that simply doesn't make it a movie (in the common sense).
games are like stories, catch and run, and you need time to develop the story line and the ups and downs. that's what games are all about: the UNPREDICTABILITY. and that's why people feel games are INTERESTING.
i just wanna give you another example: the formula 1. a sports with a very predictable race time. but it's damn long if you don't like it.
21-point scoring system not only makes the game predictably short, but also makes the game itself predictable. it's killing this game.
you may not like the examples i give hereand may think they are not comparable. well, tennis, football, NBA and F1 are highly commercialized sports. badminton is just the opposite. and that's why IBF is struggling. COMMERCIALIZATION IS THE ONLY WAY OUT.
12-19-2005, 11:34 AM #47Originally Posted by franxon
Punch Gunalan doesn't get it. After the recent world cup, he said that the new system was a success because it made the game durations predictable and most games finished within 40 minutes. From what he said, it is clear that to them, making a game duration predictable is THE ultimate target. But why? Because he (they) believes that a predictable duration is good for promoting the game. They are so wrong.
I believe IBF is getting everything wrong. The main problem is not with the scoring format. Why? Let's say after many many experiments with different scoring formats (7x5, 21x3, 31x3, 3x13 etc) and IBF still can't increase the popularity of the game, what do they do next? Hey let's change the size of the court! No effect? Let's change the racquet! Make the racquet two handed just like tennis! Let's change the shuttlecock! Remove the feathers and make the round part larger just like a tennis ball!
IBF will get to no where if they think changing the game will make the game more popular. It's not the original game anymore. IBF is totally missing the point: The best and only way to promote a game is through marketing exercises, not by changing the game.
The plain and simple truth is that IBF svcks at marketing. The solution is that they need to employ true marketing talents and professionals.
12-19-2005, 11:48 AM #48Originally Posted by DinkAlot
12-19-2005, 12:06 PM #49
Well since so many pll talk about how IBF sucks etc... and no respond from IBF about it. I see if i can talk to the VP about it the non-official way.
12-19-2005, 12:14 PM #50
Try not to use the "skunk manure" quote, by the way.
12-19-2005, 12:48 PM #51Originally Posted by wood_22_chuck
Hahah..if you talk to those pll in the streets , you may do that. Anyway its not professional if we talk to other pll like that or by using that kind of quotes. I'm sure you wouldn't like it too right?.
By james23336 in forum General ForumReplies: 4: 05-03-2007, 04:13 PM
By MikeJ in forum Jonas Rasmussen ForumReplies: 21: 06-05-2006, 07:03 AM
By cxytdn in forum General ForumReplies: 1: 05-12-2006, 09:43 PM
By N. Usmani in forum General ForumReplies: 11: 03-18-2002, 04:31 AM
By cooler in forum General ForumReplies: 3: 05-01-2001, 09:04 AM