Results 137 to 153 of 210
Thread: Yonex should re-introduce Ti-10?
03-29-2006, 12:14 AM #137
i think yonex is trying to recreate a demographic of customers for the ti-10.
they're doing this buy making the new ti-10 easier to use... this enables a larger and wider range of people to use it... sort of milking the customer base for whatever more than ti-10 can draw in.
seriously, the old ti-10s were nuts. they hit hard. very hard. its hard to use. plus they felt like a big hammer.
recently we ordered three 3U's and one 2U ti-10 (old style paint 2005), and wow, if i can, i'd say these weren't ti-10's anymore.
i didn't need any adaptation time at all, between my regular ns8000s, and i'm sure we all consider a ns8000 and a ti-10 to be rather different. they felt great right off the first swing.
03-29-2006, 12:33 AM #138
Alex, I just ment for you to write properly (instead of "this sucks"), as Mannie written it in a differently way to send a similar message.
I wanted to add that, you would need to know who your audience is.
03-29-2006, 12:38 AM #139
Ok if this will make you stop crying, Carbonex's mean nothing to me I have no opinion on them and now I'm being politically correct to shut your mouth. Ya know if you're going to university you should probably take an english class or something because your horrible at it.
03-29-2006, 12:45 AM #140Originally Posted by chickenpoodle
for 2years now yonex has yet to release any more racket w/ UHMG, while some might argue that how yonex call their material is arbitary, there is an extend to which they can define imo
from the "recent" release rackets, i only see at700 has it on its frame, didn't bother to check w/ at800, but none of ns-series has it
maybe fullerene is really better, but it doesn't hurt to produce a nano-UHMG racket rather than nano-HMG right?
personally i wouldn't be picky on material use on the racket, since all those hi-tech stuff might just be few percent of the whole racket, but what yonex doing is... cheesy
given the product line that yonex has in general sense, mp/at/ns should cover most user's preferences already, keeping ti10 can treat it as classic, but reintroducing it seems odd
just my view...
03-29-2006, 01:23 AM #141Originally Posted by alex_jacobsen
BTW: You are violating the forum rules.
Last edited by Matt; 03-29-2006 at 01:37 AM.
03-29-2006, 01:31 AM #142Originally Posted by hydrocyanic
I think it will make no sense to produce nano-UHMG. HMG has more voids for the nano to fill; UHMG has much less voids and the high costs of UHMG will make the price of racquets beyond the reach of most players.
03-29-2006, 01:33 AM #143
What forum rule did I violate that you didn't already violate? exactly
03-29-2006, 02:09 AM #144Originally Posted by taneepak
as for saying HMG having more voids to fill, i don't think yonex will be using more fullerene on HMG than UHMG anyways, since fullerene should be even costier to make?
alex: it is not about forum rule, but about how useless your post is
03-29-2006, 02:53 AM #145Originally Posted by hydrocyanic
03-29-2006, 03:08 AM #146Originally Posted by taneepak
03-29-2006, 03:18 AM #147Originally Posted by hydrocyanic
03-29-2006, 03:29 AM #148Originally Posted by hydrocyanic
When I first tried my friend's Ti-10, I love it. I ask a friend of mine to buy it from Singapore. I specifically asked for the old color scheme. It turns out that this Ti-10 is head light even though it still uses the old color scheme. The racket has not arrived here yet, but I am disappointed already.
03-29-2006, 04:24 AM #149Originally Posted by blinan8088
i think it is normal for a racket of the same model to vary a little bit per racket as it would cost too much on the defined defects, how did you measure its bp? original wrap and everything?
03-29-2006, 04:54 AM #150Originally Posted by hydrocyanic
I have not measured the balance point of my racket since it is not here yet. However, one thing for sure is it is not head-heavy. My brother who has held the racket said that it is very light.. I will measure the balance point (without string and grip) when the racket arrives and report it here.
03-29-2006, 04:59 AM #151Originally Posted by blinan8088
feeling light can be many reasons, good luck
if you feel too headlight you can always adjust through grip wrapping
04-07-2006, 08:49 PM #152
Strange, if the Ti10 is an UHMG (old version) or an HMG (new version), why then is it called the Ti10 (Ti for titanium)?
04-08-2006, 12:46 AM #153Originally Posted by taneepak
By preser in forum IntroductionReplies: 2: 10-12-2009, 02:12 PM
By Sinar Mataram in forum IntroductionReplies: 6: 08-26-2009, 01:54 AM
By whitewolf_193 in forum IntroductionReplies: 9: 06-12-2008, 07:02 AM
By Angie_mui in forum IntroductionReplies: 17: 08-23-2005, 07:23 PM
By hhppyy in forum Chit-ChatReplies: 16: 02-13-2003, 02:39 AM