Results 1 to 17 of 51
02-28-2006, 12:36 AM #1
Misconceptions about static balance point
Badminton racquets have been getting lighter, from close to 140g to today's 80-94g. This is due to new and better materials. The reduction in weight comes mainly from the shaft and the handle. Older, heavier, racquets were mostly head-light racquets. Newer, lighter, racquets are more head-heavy than the older racquets, mainly because it's increased swingweight is necessary to offset its drastic reduction in weight.
With the increasing use of overgrips and all shades and weight of replacement grips, the racquet balance point is more often than not shifted from its designed balance point. A racquet that is designed to be head-heavy, like the AT700, can be transformed into a very head-light racquet by adding a heavy replacement grip. This problem is further compounded by the tendency of the owner wanting to use every last inch of a replacement grip, which gives rise to an additional problem of making the final grip almost round, besides drastically changing the designed b/p.
This often results in the chosen racquet not exhibiting its designed objective. The after market for grips is very lucrative and its sheer variety and ubiquity doesn't help.
If you add additional weight onto the original grip with either an overgrip or a replacement grip, your racquet b/p will shift downwards, roughly about 1.1cm to 1.2cm for every 5g increase in grip weight. Your racquet's total weight will be more and your racquet will feel more head-light. This will make the racquet a little more comfortable to hold and control but you will lose power, especially if your racquet is designed to be light and more head-heavy.
If you must add additional grips to your racquet my advice is to look for a racquet which is more head-heavy than what you are accustomed to. You then add the extra grip and this will bring back the type of even balance or head-light feel you want. But this is a rather silly way to get around one's habit of adding an extra grip.
02-28-2006, 01:54 AM #2
Would you say that adding an overgrip to a 3U racket is enough to make it into a 2U racket, assuming the 2U racket is used without overgrip? AT500 3U with overgrip feels somewhat too heavy, especially after many hours of usage and absorbing sweat, and i use the whole length of the overgrip....whereas the AT500 without overgrip feels just right. Seems to me that AT500 with overgrip has a swing weight is quite a bit more than MP77 2U, whereas without overgrip, the swing weight difference isn't as pronounced. I read the post on measurements, and know that AT500 should have higher swing weight. I'm thinking using the AT500 with the original grip, and then removing the original grip when it's worn out. Actually, i'd rather remove the original grip first, then use some food wrap on the wood, so that the wood stays clean.
02-28-2006, 04:17 AM #3Originally Posted by TheGr8Two
02-28-2006, 08:39 AM #4
Clingfilm (food wrap) will not add anything near 1g of weight. If you don't use clingfilm, more weight will be added by the remaining sticky residue.
And do you really want to pick off all those bits of gummy crap? What a waste of time
As for "misconceptions about static balance point", I suggest a completely opposite view. The misconception is that weight on the handle affects the balance significantly.
It doesn't, as I explain clearly in this post: http://www.badmintoncentral.com/foru...&postcount=500 .
Many people have argued from experience that static balance does or does not affect the perceived balance of a racket. I say that these assertions are heavily based on personal subjective judgement and therefore cannot be trusted. Besides, whose judgement will you trust? Mine? Eepak's?
My argument is clear and does not rely on vague personal assessments of a rackets' "feel".
Although, as it happens, I arrive at the same conclusion from my subjective assessment.
Last edited by Gollum; 02-28-2006 at 08:43 AM.
02-28-2006, 08:54 AM #5Originally Posted by Gollum
02-28-2006, 12:16 PM #6Originally Posted by taneepak
02-28-2006, 12:31 PM #7Originally Posted by Gollum
overgrip, however light, isn't added onto the fulcrum...so it actually does change the fulcrum. ánd teh swing weight....
it's not a one-variable story...
also what definatly does change the b.p. are those bulks people put on the end of their grips for gods knows what reason..
02-28-2006, 12:38 PM #8
just outta nowhere, pops in my head
if we r to consider balance point when a racket hit a bird
if we conisder the racket as an extension of the arm
and the swing is actually the entire movment of your arm + the racket.
wouldn't we put the arm + the racket as a whole in the equation?
the movable joins creating the wipping action would be start from yr shoulder
to your elbow to the waist to the racket head.
in that case.. i would think the grip has little impact on the action as a whole
cos the grip is at your wasit and thats one of the lever point.
02-28-2006, 12:43 PM #9
but it definatly is worth bothering if you know what you wnat in b.p.'s
I personally have found the holy-grail in manouvreable rackets..power by swing speed, not swing weight...my ns8k...not that I'm that fast...
02-28-2006, 02:37 PM #10Originally Posted by jerby
02-28-2006, 04:08 PM #11
once moved the bp from 300 to 285
the racket is much different and it feel bad
now with a thick grip i wrap onlt 3/4 or 3/5 of the handle, it perform much better
smash, clear, etc are done in a better fashion in the next game, i don' think i improve in just 2hrs...
just feel, nothing scientific
racket is ti10, first was kawasaki repl. grip + overgrip wrapped all the way pass the cone
then its babolat woover wrapped to 3/4 oe 3/5 of the handle
02-28-2006, 04:15 PM #12
but u do have to caculate in the effect that
the reason we want to add grip to a racket is so that
we have the right grip size
and @ the right grip size, it Does improve your game
and that is not related to the balance point be shifted down or not
02-28-2006, 04:29 PM #13
thickness is about the same on both combinations
with rpl+over grip i can't even swing pass 3/4 of the court from baseline
i don't think my str increase all the sudden either
ps. i wouldn't say this is better or worse, but this works for me, played with many other variation of grips as well already, the current configuration is best so far
02-28-2006, 04:35 PM #14
i guess the change can be bad/good
trail and error to see which combination works best then stick with it.
see pro double players warp the grip all the way to the cone
supposingly that would throw the balance point off by a lot
making the racket's characteristic changes.
However.. doing so they can grab the racket much higher then normal and now THAT is what i consider an EFFECTIVE way of changing the balance point.
plus u see LD and tuf griping only the very last 2 inches of the racket, they'r also changing the balance point to a way that contributs their games most as well. I suppose its allrite to change the way a racket is DESIGNed to be played
as long as u'r happy with the changes.
Last edited by chessymonkey; 02-28-2006 at 04:42 PM.
02-28-2006, 05:46 PM #15
i didnt comment before so i dont view as jumping on taneepak all the time.
i think taneepak over exaggerated the importance of grip weight on bp. A thin overgrip adds isignificant mass near the axis of rotation so changes in racket swing moment is unnoticeable. 3g of glue is overblown unless u r pulling the wood chips with the glue. For those users who put on thick or multiple overgrips (eg. >5g), they are generally brute players and bp means little to them. I also dont think people buy rackets with consideraton of bp changes due to overgrip. THE CHOICE OF STRING HAS MORE INFLUENCE ON SWING MOMENT THAN A FOAM TYPE OVERGRIP. SWING MOMENT RULES, NOT B.P.
i agree one point, yes, some people do have misconception about static b.p. and u know who
03-01-2006, 12:01 PM #16
I have a two layers of replacement grip on my racket handle (I removed the original grip). This increases the handle width considerably.
I do not notice any difference in the feel of the racket swing (except, of course, that it is now the right size for my hand!).
These grips probably total about 10g of added weight.
I must find some good overgrips so I can save money.....
03-02-2006, 01:05 PM #17
I experimented adding 12.5g, 6g, and 3g to the bottom end of a Ti-10 handle. In all instances, the static balance point was lowered and the racket swing speed increased. I know the swing speed increased because often when I swing, I miss the shuttle. This kind of miss doesn't happen with my other unmodified Ti-10's. I finally settled on a permanent weight increase of 3g by filling the hole at the end of the wooden handle with 3g of bathroom silicone sealant. the sealant also acted as a glue for the cap. The end result is the balance point moving from 295mm to 290mm and the racket became my most powerful Ti-10 yet. Now, all my clears going out by a couple of feet, and the smashing power was unprecedented from my own hand.
By 12etsam in forum Badminton Rackets / EquipmentReplies: 3: 03-16-2009, 02:56 PM
By calfunz in forum Badminton Rackets / EquipmentReplies: 6: 06-02-2006, 06:48 PM
By Jan_BE in forum Badminton Rackets / EquipmentReplies: 2: 05-25-2006, 10:30 AM
By MarcRafles in forum Badminton Rackets / EquipmentReplies: 11: 10-12-2003, 02:26 AM
By Mag in forum General ForumReplies: 7: 02-18-2001, 06:01 AM