User Tag List

Page 6 of 9 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 LastLast
Results 86 to 102 of 138
  1. #86
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Nottingham, UK
    Posts
    1,719
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by foureyeming View Post
    what tension do you guys string ngb 98 at ? , and compare to the bg 66 , because i have been using bg 66 for a long time and i like thin strings !
    It's much, much more powerful than BG-66 but has very little feel. If you like the feel BG-66 gives you, NBG-98 probably isn't for you but if you're looking for power, NBG-98 won't disappoint.

  2. #87
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Richmond, BC
    Posts
    5,209
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by foureyeming View Post
    what tension do you guys string ngb 98 at ? , and compare to the bg 66 , because i have been using bg 66 for a long time and i like thin strings !
    It was strung at 25x27. Same tension which I use on the BG-85.

    Quote Originally Posted by Danstevens View Post
    It's much, much more powerful than BG-66 but has very little feel. If you like the feel BG-66 gives you, NBG-98 probably isn't for you but if you're looking for power, NBG-98 won't disappoint.
    BG-66 is a bit on the soft side which would explain for the lack of feel.

  3. #88
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Markham
    Posts
    199
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    whats the tension for BG-65 Ti

  4. #89
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Singapore, Tampines
    Posts
    279
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ilostmybrain View Post
    whats the tension for BG-65 Ti
    what do you mean?

    Anyway, i'm using the BG65 Ti on my Arc10 & it has a very good feel & control at 23 x 24lbs.

  5. #90
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    ? ?The Moon? ?
    Posts
    1,087
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I know this is off topic but is the MP 100 more head heavy than the Armortec 700?

  6. #91
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Nottingham, UK
    Posts
    1,719
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by krisss View Post
    I know this is off topic but is the MP 100 more head heavy than the Armortec 700?
    Short answer is.........no.

  7. #92
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    ? ?The Moon? ?
    Posts
    1,087
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Danstevens View Post
    Short answer is.........no.
    lol

    Thankyou for such a short answer - my next question is ,
    how come mp 100 is more of a singles player racket than armortec 700?

  8. #93
    Moderator Oldhand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Asia
    Posts
    7,332
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by krisss View Post
    I know this is off topic but is the MP 100 more head heavy than the Armortec 700?
    No, it is not

    If it weren't so, I doubt Reiko Shiota and Kumiko Ogura would have used the MP-100

  9. #94
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Nottingham, UK
    Posts
    1,719
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by krisss View Post
    lol

    Thankyou for such a short answer - my next question is ,
    how come mp 100 is more of a singles player racket than armortec 700?
    That's a good question.

    *thinks long and hard about MP100 and AT700*

    My only guess is that the MP100 is more manoeuvrable than the AT700. As much as a head heavy racket is good for smashing, you need to do other things too, making the more balanced MP100 preferable to the AT700. There's probably another reason but that's the best I can come up with.

  10. #95
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    3,653
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by krisss View Post
    lol

    Thankyou for such a short answer - my next question is ,
    how come mp 100 is more of a singles player racket than armortec 700?
    I would say it's the opposite. AT700 would be better for singles than MP100.

  11. #96
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Nottingham, UK
    Posts
    1,719
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phandrew View Post
    I would say it's the opposite. AT700 would be better for singles than MP100.
    Me too, actually. The Yonex chart begs to differ though.

  12. #97
    Regular Member chilli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    chilliwack, b.c., Can./Mas.
    Posts
    490
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    My son has BG66 on his carb 21 @21#s...nice sound and power. I have arc10 with NGY95 @ 27/29#s, and has the same great sound when smashing, but more power.

  13. #98
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    53
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    my coach said. the difference between these strings are the radius....the smaller it is...the better it bounce...which means better smash. however less durable...for example: bg 85. and the bigger it is...the slower it is and less bounce...however more durable. for example bg 65.....

    my coach also said...the difference between bg 65 and the most expensive strings are not that big. the tension matters more....

    for people who have GREAT knowledge on strings...please teach me....or tell me....what strings i should get for a flex racket and my mp100. THANK VERY MUCH!!!!!!!
    Last edited by chriz; 04-02-2009 at 05:50 PM.

  14. #99
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    53
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    personally..i got a mp 100.....mp 100 is definitely...definitely...not for singles. i have been playing it for 2 years....horrible defense. .....AT 700 is probably 1 of the best single rackets...out there....they cant really compare with each other....they are 2 different type of rackets....

  15. #100
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    vancouver
    Posts
    28
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i hate bg 65 strings

  16. #101
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    118
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i hate bg 65 as well...i rather pay the extra coupla bucks for bg80

  17. #102
    New Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Calgary
    Posts
    9
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by issarakaya View Post
    Depend on what you looking for. For repulsion i think its the best, there is no string can achieve the power from NBG 98. For control its poor, slippery and little bit numb also remember the price is very But i'm using it at almost all my racket, since i feel the repulsion is helping me a lot since i was a lazy player


    The NBG98s amazing, without a doubt the best string for a offensive player, ofcourse it's very expensive, but in Japan you can get them for just a little more than the NBG95. I got a 30 or a 60 meter roll of NBG98, I broke the string once in 3 months. The only thing that the NBG is not so good at is the feel. Hitting the bird slowly makes the strings feel dead, hard to get the right amount of power for dropshots.

Page 6 of 9 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Yonex selection chart
    By Winex West Can in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 337
    : 05-23-2014, 08:36 AM
  2. Help! Strings Chart from Yonex.com
    By sbowesuk in forum Badminton String
    Replies: 10
    : 04-14-2007, 11:43 PM
  3. String Tension loss chart req/proposal.
    By vatovey in forum Badminton String
    Replies: 4
    : 01-15-2007, 10:19 AM
  4. yonex chart-NS9000
    By doris160260 in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 2
    : 02-08-2006, 11:26 PM
  5. String Chart?
    By Jan_BE in forum Badminton String
    Replies: 19
    : 07-01-2005, 10:02 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •