User Tag List

Page 7 of 9 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 LastLast
Results 103 to 119 of 138
  1. #103
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    vancouver
    Posts
    28
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    anybody know what min. tension for NGB98 on nanospeed rackets that works good ?

  2. #104
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Richmond, BC
    Posts
    5,209
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SkillzGT View Post
    The NBG98s amazing, without a doubt the best string for a offensive player, ofcourse it's very expensive, but in Japan you can get them for just a little more than the NBG95. I got a 30 or a 60 meter roll of NBG98, I broke the string once in 3 months. The only thing that the NBG is not so good at is the feel. Hitting the bird slowly makes the strings feel dead, hard to get the right amount of power for dropshots.
    The string is very repulsive, however it lacks control if you are a touch player. I personally used to use NGB-98 before I swithched to BG-85 and found it much better for power/control.

    Quote Originally Posted by foureyeming View Post
    anybody know what min. tension for NGB98 on nanospeed rackets that works good ?
    There is not exactly a minimum you could define to determine what is good on the racket. The question is more like what tension is suitable which the player can handle.

  3. #105
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Long Beach
    Posts
    8
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I have BG80 on my AT900power stringed at 26lbs. i like it alot and it compares almost just like BG85

  4. #106
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    ? ?The Moon? ?
    Posts
    1,087
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by krisss View Post
    I know this is off topic but is the MP 100 more head heavy than the Armortec 700?
    First time I have quoted myself .

    My question is why is the MP100 rated over the Armrotec 700 on the chart as mroe of a singles players racket?

    The only thing Yonex traditionally class as a better singles racket is headheavyness and stiffness.

    The Armortec 700 surpasses the MP100 in both of these aspects , so why is the MP100 over it?

    Thankyou

  5. #107
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Nottingham, UK
    Posts
    1,719
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by krisss View Post
    First time I have quoted myself .

    My question is why is the MP100 rated over the Armrotec 700 on the chart as mroe of a singles players racket?

    The only thing Yonex traditionally class as a better singles racket is headheavyness and stiffness.

    The Armortec 700 surpasses the MP100 in both of these aspects , so why is the MP100 over it?

    Thankyou
    I'm sure the MP-100 is stiffer than the AT700, the AT700 isn't extra stiff at all. Maybe medium-stiff to stiff but not extra stiff.

    Anyway, to any badminton player worth their salt, the chart is meaningless anyway. Think about how many world class singles players play with head light rackets.

  6. #108
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    ? ?The Moon? ?
    Posts
    1,087
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Danstevens View Post
    I'm sure the MP-100 is stiffer than the AT700, the AT700 isn't extra stiff at all. Maybe medium-stiff to stiff but not extra stiff.

    Anyway, to any badminton player worth their salt, the chart is meaningless anyway. Think about how many world class singles players play with head light rackets.
    Yeah - the chart is just ennoying me.

    I thought the Armortec 700 was extra stiff?

    http://www.tennisnuts.com/ishop/677/shopscr5359.html

    EDIT:

    A more reliable source would be yonex themselves :

    http://www.yonex.com/badminton/racquets/armortec.html

  7. #109
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    56
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    this chart looks kinda outdated, is there an updated one with more newer strings?
    Same with the racket chart.

  8. #110
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    philippines
    Posts
    67
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Smile

    hi guys... what is/are the difference/s between softfeel and hardfeel yonex string? i've just bought a yonex bg65 and written on its pack that is durable and is softfeel... thanks

  9. #111
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    n/a
    Posts
    76
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    kinda old, dontcha think? (weres my nbg 95)

  10. #112
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    england, london
    Posts
    139
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    hey guys, in your opinion how does the bg 65ti compared to the bg 65? i'm use to bg 65 but the stringer did it with the wrong string

  11. #113
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    215
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by o0 VaPoR 0o View Post
    The new chart. The Nanogy is in the middle of everything.
    Is there a new chart? This is kind of old. And I have still not seen any chart with bg66 although the string has been around for centuries.

  12. #114
    New Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    GTA
    Posts
    4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Anyone seen a chart with BG66, or NBG 95?

  13. #115
    Regular Member khmaiboi92's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Long Beach, California
    Posts
    85
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think there is a new chart on the japanese catalog.

  14. #116
    Regular Member demolidor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    @Hollanti
    Posts
    11,726
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wilson Shuttler View Post
    kinda old, dontcha think? (weres my nbg 95)
    Quote Originally Posted by maxp74 View Post
    Is there a new chart? This is kind of old. And I have still not seen any chart with bg66 although the string has been around for centuries.
    Quote Originally Posted by JapNoodles View Post
    Anyone seen a chart with BG66, or NBG 95?
    Page 3 for the "updated" one with NBG95 . There is no BG66 in Japan therefore it's not going to be on the chart, not that there has been any update since that 2007 one. Don't think they do charts like that anymore(?)

    Quote Originally Posted by khmaiboi92 View Post
    I think there is a new chart on the japanese catalog.
    Nope (not in that format anyway)




  15. #117
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Edmonton Alberta
    Posts
    26
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Would it make my flexible racket unbalance if I string it with lets say, BG 80 or BG65 TI. What would be an ideal string for an NS 6000 if I want to improve its smashing power?

  16. #118
    Regular Member demolidor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    @Hollanti
    Posts
    11,726
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RyomaEchizen View Post
    Would it make my flexible racket unbalance if I string it with lets say, BG 80 or BG65 TI. What would be an ideal string for an NS 6000 if I want to improve its smashing power?
    Yonex' (Japan's) recommendation for NS6000 (and other flexible racquets) is NBG98 for power. Perhaps give BG66 a try since it's in the same box.

  17. #119
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Edmonton Alberta
    Posts
    26
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by demolidor View Post
    Yonex' (Japan's) recommendation for NS6000 (and other flexible racquets) is NBG98 for power. Perhaps give BG66 a try since it's in the same box.
    So it does really give it more power huh? Wow, I can't wait for that! I'll get used to this racket for its excellent control then change my strings

Page 7 of 9 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Yonex selection chart
    By Winex West Can in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 337
    : 05-23-2014, 08:36 AM
  2. Help! Strings Chart from Yonex.com
    By sbowesuk in forum Badminton String
    Replies: 10
    : 04-14-2007, 11:43 PM
  3. String Tension loss chart req/proposal.
    By vatovey in forum Badminton String
    Replies: 4
    : 01-15-2007, 10:19 AM
  4. yonex chart-NS9000
    By doris160260 in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 2
    : 02-08-2006, 11:26 PM
  5. String Chart?
    By Jan_BE in forum Badminton String
    Replies: 19
    : 07-01-2005, 10:02 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •