Results 35 to 51 of 93
Thread: 21-point is better
03-21-2006, 02:45 AM #35
Originally Posted by taneepak
03-21-2006, 02:52 AM #36
Originally Posted by shawn30_k
What do you guys mean there are less rallies. Do you guys rather see no movement in points? Please elaborate as I recall that the top class matches have an average of about 30 - 40 shots in a rally in the Commonwealth Games?
P.S All personal attacks to my pms please.
03-21-2006, 06:15 AM #37
Originally Posted by cooler
Yes. It took many years of being out there to learn enough to be proficient in taking game. I have been doing it since i was 18 and am now 28, 10 years.
Learning to get withing 5-40 meters of game is the hardest to master and knowing where to find game. Guns are too easy.......to get within 70-200 meters.
I do eat some of the things I shoot........exept feral pigs and large mountain/feral goats.........small goats are the best meat I have ever shot and ate. Kangaroo is nice but I do not shoot them........it is illegal to do so......but if I had to on a survival camp and there was nothing else....maybe.
After all these years and learning all I have so far(still have alot to learn), I would never use a gun/rifle..........you don't need to.....plus it is too noisy and scares animals away with the loud bang, and is no where as challenging as using a bow and arrow.
03-21-2006, 06:24 AM #38
Originally Posted by badrad
Nah no grizzly bear or koala's with rabbies,lol
The only things that are dangerous here are:
Scrub Bulls ( most dangerous, Wild cows!) Trust me they are bad asses.
Wild Dogs ( yes domestic dogs gone wild, usually big hunting dogs)
Snakes, Spiders. Lots of different types.
Aslong as you are carefull you should be ok.......never go by yourself though...always have someone with you.
03-21-2006, 07:54 AM #39
Below is my own opinion.
21 points (Fast bullet and/or undurable)
1) Lee Chong Wei
15 points (slow starter)
1) Lin Dan
2) Taufik hidayat
3) Chen Hong
Anyone can add?
03-21-2006, 09:02 AM #40
Originally Posted by FEND.
I ask because I have stats showing the average length of a rally in MS is about 8.5 shots (from top class events and players ranging from 1982 to 2005) in 3x15
The longest rally in a game would be around 30-ish
I doubt if even WD would average > 30 shots per rally
03-21-2006, 09:39 AM #41
I watch the games at TV, i like the photograph angle where it is taken from top view when the doubles is serve
03-21-2006, 09:43 AM #42
I think the new system will benefit many Malaysian player
03-21-2006, 10:16 AM #43
Originally Posted by weeyet
03-21-2006, 12:16 PM #44
I'm not sure what the IBF are looking for. We went through this with 7x5. The 15 point system is fine. All they are doing is wasting time and money again.
03-21-2006, 01:50 PM #45
Somebody, not something
Bottom line, badminton is not getting popular so something has to be blame, so the scoring system is the scape goat. In my opinion, somebody who's running the badminton association should be blame, not something like 15-point scoring system.
03-21-2006, 01:55 PM #46
I just want to say, I support the old 15 pts system.
03-21-2006, 04:09 PM #47
Originally Posted by Neil Nicholls
Yeah, I don't think there were any rallies when I watched that were long rallies at all. I would agree it is around 8-10 shots
03-21-2006, 04:10 PM #48
Your arguments about rallies getting shorter is wrong. Matches finish quicker yes but that means its getting less rallies rather than the rallies themselves getting shorter.
Fine, I might be wrong on average rallies per game, but isn't it still the same with the old scoring?
03-21-2006, 06:29 PM #49
Originally Posted by Inky2000
03-21-2006, 07:58 PM #50
Originally Posted by FEND.
However i am a very tactical player........when I have serve I play differently than if getting served to.
When i get served to.....I play more of a defencive game and play more 'high percentage shots' , shots that i have little chance in making errors.
When serving I play more aggressively, I play alot of steep smashes and sharp drops. As I have the safety of losing serve and not a point.
This new system would mean changing my tactics....which have served me well.
I have the ability to adapt, but i feel with the new system I would choose a more deffencive game.........for the whole game and seldom play aggressively.......might be boring, as when I have the serve I play like an animal and when I don't i play very defencively trying to draw the opponents own errors.
03-21-2006, 10:45 PM #51
haha yes...tactics all different.
i was watching Lee Chong Wei (MAS) play Aamir Ghaffer (ENG) in the mixed teams events gold medal match,
score was 21-8 and 21-8
Seriously, if it was the 15 point system that was clearly a score similiar to 15-2 15-0 ---> thrashing
Big gap in talent, but with this new scoring system, we'll begin to see top players becoming more human!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Games will be much closer; it is so very hard not to concede a point!!!!
I dont think ive ever seen a 21-0 ......closest one was Stuart Brehaut (AUS) vs some Kenyan guy....he was leading 17-0, then gave away one point....21-1 at the end...
my two cents --> dont know what you think of that guys!
Last edited by FrenziedEye; 03-21-2006 at 10:48 PM.
By Pete LSD in forum Badminton Stringing Techniques & ToolsReplies: 107: 04-17-2012, 12:11 AM
By 16_FeatherS in forum Rules / Tournament Regulation / OfficiatingReplies: 9: 05-14-2011, 12:18 AM
By Wong8Egg in forum Rules / Tournament Regulation / OfficiatingReplies: 5: 03-29-2009, 07:04 AM
By CkcJsm in forum General ForumReplies: 12: 03-19-2009, 07:26 AM
By taneepak in forum Badminton Stringing Techniques & ToolsReplies: 11: 06-30-2004, 05:34 PM