User Tag List

Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast
Results 69 to 85 of 93
  1. #69
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Milpitas, CA
    Posts
    75
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Smile If switching to 21pts is for better time control ...

    If switching to 21pts is for better time control,
    why IBF never thought of make it a Time System (like soccer/basketball) instead of Point System.

    My suggestion would be:

    Let's use 30min for game and whoever take the lead by the end of that 30min would be the winner.

    OR

    30min or 15point x 3 games, whichever end fist

    How does that sounds?

  2. #70
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    399
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BooYa
    If switching to 21pts is for better time control,
    why IBF never thought of make it a Time System (like soccer/basketball) instead of Point System.

    My suggestion would be:

    Let's use 30min for game and whoever take the lead by the end of that 30min would be the winner.

    OR

    30min or 15point x 3 games, whichever end fist

    How does that sounds?

    Maybe.......but the fact there is no time restriction makes badminton a good game.

    Could you imagine losing and on a comeback and the clock has 15secs left?

    I would hate that.

  3. #71
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Milpitas, CA
    Posts
    75
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    that is "forcing" either sides not to lay back, they have to fight for staying in the leading mode all the time ... guess that would increase the excitement of the game too.

    of course, some ground rule has to be set, eg. the 30min has to be the actual play time, any time that wasted for short breaks or arguement of bad calls etc. should not be counted.

  4. #72
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    19
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Question

    that is "forcing" either sides not to lay back, they have to fight for staying in the leading mode all the time ... guess that would increase the excitement of the game too.
    I think adding a time deadline would rush players into makign more mistakes....

    If there ARE people in favour of different types of systems, why cant the tournaments decide what type of system is used in each one? Say All England could use 15 X 3 , Comm. Games 21 X 3 rally point and Thomas Cup some other system.....

    In the end, the top five world players would have to be proficient in ALL these systems,

    and it would test all the top players' tactics in every match and/or tournament they play...


    dunno...just a suggestion. but to be honest, Id just opt for the old 15 points system.....

    I just came up with this idea cause everyone seems to favour diff. systems!!

  5. #73
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    6,527
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BooYa
    If switching to 21pts is for better time control,
    why IBF never thought of make it a Time System (like soccer/basketball) instead of Point System.

    My suggestion would be:

    Let's use 30min for game and whoever take the lead by the end of that 30min would be the winner.

    OR

    30min or 15point x 3 games, whichever end fist

    How does that sounds?
    What happens if the score is a tie at the end of 30mins?

  6. #74
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    KL & Sg
    Posts
    5,315
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by taneepak
    What happens if the score is a tie at the end of 30mins?
    Then you get extra time. If you use the golden shuttle rule, then the first scorer wins. If not, and if it is a tie again after the end of extra time, it will be a shuttlecock shootout. You place a basket at the far end of one court and players stand at the other far end, and each get five shots in enter the basket. If still tie, then sudden-death shootout will decide the match.

  7. #75
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    19
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Thumbs down

    it will be a shuttlecock shootout. You place a basket at the far end of one court and players stand at the other far end, and each get five shots in enter the basket. If still tie, then sudden-death shootout will decide the match
    Shuttlecock shootout???!!!!! Are you joking? Are you cereal about this?

    This is turning crazy... that's more like basketball!

    No way, that just sounds horrible!
    This is badminton, not anything else.

  8. #76
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    KL & Sg
    Posts
    5,315
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FrenziedEye
    Shuttlecock shootout???!!!!! Are you joking? Are you cereal about this?

    This is turning crazy... that's more like basketball!

    No way, that just sounds horrible!
    This is badminton, not anything else.
    What's wrong with the shuttlecock shootout? I was class champion for 3 years straight. I have medals to show for it.

  9. #77
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Cambridge, UK
    Posts
    2,360
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FrenziedEye
    Shuttlecock shootout???!!!!! Are you joking? Are you cereal about this?

    This is turning crazy... that's more like basketball!

    No way, that just sounds horrible!
    This is badminton, not anything else.
    Yeah. Also, that's a bit like throwing a shuttle up and see if it lands towards you

  10. #78
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    176
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I hope this 30 minutes time thingy is a joke...
    You can't be serious really..

    I stick to this: "Why change a sport that is already the best in the world?"

    I love watching badminton on tele..
    But I wouldn't change the game to get more broadcastingtime.

    The sport is made for the people who want to play it
    not for some 'stupid viewers' that don't understand the scoring-system.
    (New scoring system would make it easier for the noob to follow)

    And, this is said before, people who like tennis don't mind spending 3,5 hours watching an exciting match.
    Same thing for us badmintonfans, why do we want to reduce the gameplay (just for broadcasting)
    If badminton isn't spectaculair enough (now), so be it..

    I really see us badmintonplayers as victims now...and I hate that!

  11. #79
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Milpitas, CA
    Posts
    75
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    If you checked back my original post,
    i was saying "IF Switching to 21 point system is for a better time control ..."

    Personally, i still support the 15 pt x 3 games system, but i was just throwing out an idea based on where IBF is coming from.

    Of course, if switching to 21 pt is not due to time concern, i see no reason why the 15 x 3 system should be changed.

    But again, if time is IBF concern, then why don't they simply use a TIME restriction system?

  12. #80
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    399
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by m_poppema
    I stick to this: "Why change a sport that is already the best in the world?"

    I love watching badminton on tele..
    But I wouldn't change the game to get more broadcastingtime.

    The sport is made for the people who want to play it
    not for some 'stupid viewers' that don't understand the scoring-system.
    (New scoring system would make it easier for the noob to follow)

    And, this is said before, people who like tennis don't mind spending 3,5 hours watching an exciting match.
    Same thing for us badmintonfans, why do we want to reduce the gameplay (just for broadcasting)
    If badminton isn't spectaculair enough (now), so be it..

    I agree, none of these changes will automatically make badminton..................more popular?

    How matches are presented and 'hyped' would make more difference.

    Time limiting rackets sports is not the answer..........tennis, squash aren't limited by time.

    I don't know if I am biased, but Badminton is far more exiting than tennis and squash to watch already.

  13. #81
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    KL & Sg
    Posts
    5,315
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Dude, I was only joking about the shuttlecock shootout ... I was never champion 3 years in a row, only runner-up twice. (joking, joking ... it was so obvious I don't know how you can take me seriously)

    A game like badminton (just like tennis or table tennis) can never be time-constrained like football or hockey. It simply does not make sense.

  14. #82
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Third Rock
    Posts
    343
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LongReach
    I agree, none of these changes will automatically make badminton..................more popular?

    How matches are presented and 'hyped' would make more difference.

    Time limiting rackets sports is not the answer..........tennis, squash aren't limited by time.

    I don't know if I am biased, but Badminton is far more exiting than tennis and squash to watch already.
    Rackets games are not mend to be a time limit game. It will kill the games off. Anyway, tennis is kind of interesting too especially ladies single.

  15. #83
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    399
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hcyong
    Dude, I was only joking about the shuttlecock shootout ... I was never champion 3 years in a row, only runner-up twice. (joking, joking ... it was so obvious I don't know how you can take me seriously)

    A game like badminton (just like tennis or table tennis) can never be time-constrained like football or hockey. It simply does not make sense.

    Oh I thought you were serious ...........not!


    Maybe instead of a shuttle shoot out the players must fight bare fisted until only one man is still standing?.........yeah, that sounds cool!

    That would be exciting: Badminton crossed with UFC and WWF!

    P.S : This is a Joke!

  16. #84
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Third Rock
    Posts
    343
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LongReach
    Oh I thought you were serious ...........not!


    Maybe instead of a shuttle shoot out the players must fight bare fisted until only one man is still standing?.........yeah, that sounds cool!

    That would be exciting: Badminton crossed with UFC and WWF!

    P.S : This is a Joke!
    Hahahaha.....Imagine The Big Show play against LCW and lost the match. Then LCW was beaten up by The Big Show.....

  17. #85
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    399
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sammy
    Hahahaha.....Imagine The Big Show play against LCW and lost the match. Then LCW was beaten up by The Big Show.....
    Now thats entertainment! Ouch my stomach hurts from laughter now!

Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Six-Point Suspension Vs. Six-Point Internal
    By Pete LSD in forum Badminton Stringing Techniques & Tools
    Replies: 107
    : 04-17-2012, 12:11 AM
  2. Who Gets The Point?
    By 16_FeatherS in forum Rules / Tournament Regulation / Officiating
    Replies: 9
    : 05-14-2011, 12:18 AM
  3. Who won the point?
    By Wong8Egg in forum Rules / Tournament Regulation / Officiating
    Replies: 5
    : 03-29-2009, 07:04 AM
  4. Replies: 12
    : 03-19-2009, 07:26 AM
  5. 2-point, 4-point, 6-point stringing machines-what does it mean?
    By taneepak in forum Badminton Stringing Techniques & Tools
    Replies: 11
    : 06-30-2004, 05:34 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •