Results 1,293 to 1,309 of 1584
Thread: Alternative photos
11-04-2009, 07:51 AM #1293
Fooling around with my new lens!
Kwun has got exactly the same lens!
11-04-2009, 09:57 AM #1294
wow, red..that photo is pretty impressive!
11-04-2009, 10:42 AM #1295
Thank you george! The lens that I used was in fact a "home made" tilt lens. It was made of a CZJ 80mm f2.8 and a tilt mount (kwun has it too!).
You can't really see the real power out of it at the moment. Coz that photo was shot through a thick glass. But I have to say the quality of this East German made 80mm lens was much much better than I thought!
11-04-2009, 11:38 AM #1296
11-04-2009, 05:33 PM #1297
11-04-2009, 06:37 PM #1298
It allows Pentacon Six lenses to fit major 35mm slr/dslr cameras with a tilt mechanism. It can be tilted from 0 to 8 degree.
For more information about Pentacon Six lenses and cameras. You can visit http://www.pentaconsix.com/
11-04-2009, 06:43 PM #1299
11-04-2009, 07:42 PM #1300
i shouldn't have asked...now i have to fight the BBB virus again... :P
11-04-2009, 08:49 PM #1301
11-04-2009, 09:55 PM #1302
must resist....been spending $ on my bicycle....no $ left for camera stuff or badminton stuff
11-04-2009, 11:17 PM #1303
11-04-2009, 11:42 PM #1304
11-05-2009, 02:41 PM #1305
you cannot resist... you cannot resist.. :P~~
no love for badminton or photography anymore my friend?
on serious note.. this remind me of something... lens baby
I have not read or do any research to this though... but I saw ads for lens baby.. it seem it can tilt too.. is lens baby can do the same thing?
11-05-2009, 03:57 PM #1306
hahaha, i thot i was mavis fan:P
anyway, i don't know where to slot this article
Photographers Are Not Authors, Says Judge in Google Book Case
by: Erick Schonfeld November 05, 2009
The latest twist in the ongoing settlement talks between Google (GOOG) and book authors is that Wednesday, the judge in the case denied an attempt by photographers to become part of the settlement. In the decision (embedded below), Judge Denny Chin basically ruled that photographers are not authors, and that the settlement only covers “word-based material,” with the exception of illustrations in children’s books.
The motion to join the suit was brought by the American Society of Media Photographers, the Graphic Artists Guild, the Picture Archive Council of America, the North American Nature Photographers Association, and several individual photographers. The current settlement is between Google and the Author’s Guild.
The judge writes that the motion was filed to late, and that in any case, the current settlement does not preclude photographers from bringing their own lawsuit.
Obviously, many books include photographs and illustrations. If a book is scanned into Google’s searchable database with a copyrighted image, it appears that Google might still be liable for displaying those images. At least that is what judge Chin suggests when he writes that the settlement does not copyright holders of “pictorial materials and binds them in no way.” I’ve asked Google for clarification on how it intends to deal with such issues.
11-05-2009, 05:16 PM #1307
initial costs: photography >>>> cycling >> badminton
ongoing costs: cycling > badminton > photography
susceptibility to upgradeitis: photography = cycling >>>> badminton
11-05-2009, 05:33 PM #1308
11-05-2009, 05:37 PM #1309
By olli in forum Badminton StringReplies: 20: 09-10-2012, 12:22 AM
By KaffiQ in forum Racket Recommendation / ComparisonReplies: 16: 08-09-2009, 01:42 PM
By ice_dragon in forum Racket Recommendation / ComparisonReplies: 4: 03-14-2009, 04:40 PM
By rubenboogaard in forum Badminton Rackets / EquipmentReplies: 1: 11-11-2007, 11:59 AM
By Cricket in forum Badminton StringReplies: 11: 03-10-2004, 05:31 AM