User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 17 of 19
  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Vacation Home @ Disney World
    Posts
    2,198
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Human factor in making the draw

    There will be 12 China singles in China Open. It is strange that 9 out of 12 will be in the first half, the other 3 in the bottom half. It sounds away from random selection. There are 6 more players in the upper half than the bottom half. This is unexplainable from statistics normal distribution.

    Since there are some rules to make seeds distributed evenly. So upper to bottom half ratio for seeds is 3:2, it is okay. But

    For non-seeded CHN players, 6 out of 7 in the upper half, while only 1 in the bottom half. The chance for this happening is about 4%.

    More, those unseeded CHN players concentrated in Bao CL and Lin Dan's 1/16.

    It is more like a plot to murder those unknown CHN players as early as possible, to avoid them destroying the pecking order of world badminton.

  2. #2
    Regular Member maa2003's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Kemaman, Malaysia
    Posts
    1,766
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    we do not know how IBF did a draw .........
    but to my understanding, IBF put the seeded players first in the position, which is almost fixed position, then randomly pick other players from the rest ..........
    so, the draw shall be fair enough.

    if I see correctly, in the MS of China Open draw, 6 in the top-half and 3 in the bottom half.

    anyway, just enjoy the games .......

    Quote Originally Posted by 2cents
    There will be 12 China singles in China Open. It is strange that 9 out of 12 will be in the first half, the other 3 in the bottom half. It sounds away from random selection. There are 6 more players in the upper half than the bottom half. This is unexplainable from statistics normal distribution.

    Since there are some rules to make seeds distributed evenly. So upper to bottom half ratio for seeds is 3:2, it is okay. But

    For non-seeded CHN players, 6 out of 7 in the upper half, while only 1 in the bottom half. The chance for this happening is about 4%.

    More, those unseeded CHN players concentrated in Bao CL and Lin Dan's 1/16.

    It is more like a plot to murder those unknown CHN players as early as possible, to avoid them destroying the pecking order of world badminton.

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Vacation Home @ Disney World
    Posts
    2,198
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by maa2003

    if I see correctly, in the MS of China Open draw, 6 in the top-half and 3 in the bottom half.
    .......
    There are 9 in the top-half and 3 in the bottom half.

    You see 6 in the main draw, there are also 3 other chinese in the qualification round, which are also in the upper half.

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    calgary
    Posts
    22
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    2cents, your plot theory does not make any sense to me. Some of these unknown Chinese players are more dangerous to top seeds like LD and BCL than many of the known non-Chinese players. They are unknown mainly because they haven't got opportunities to play in international competitions and if they do they often produce major upsets, just like LD and BCL before becoming known. If it were the otherway round in the draw, namely 9 new Chinese players in the other half, I would think it as a plot, because they might be used to kick the other main title contenders out or tire them out. I would not be surprised to see either LD or BCL be beaten by one of these unknown players.

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Vacation Home @ Disney World
    Posts
    2,198
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by smashko
    2cents, your plot theory does not make any sense to me. Some of these unknown Chinese players are more dangerous to top seeds like LD and BCL than many of the known non-Chinese players. They are unknown mainly because they haven't got opportunities to play in international competitions and if they do they often produce major upsets, just like LD and BCL before becoming known. If it were the otherway round in the draw, namely 9 new Chinese players in the other half, I would think it as a plot, because they might be used to kick the other main title contenders out or tire them out. I would not be surprised to see either LD or BCL be beaten by one of these unknown players.
    What you said was the same as I said. Because those unknown Chinese are pretty good, if they played more often, a lot of players, like Eric Pang, would be out of top 20. That's the exact reason IBF arranged the draw, to localize or contain Chinese players. Let them play each other first, so that other players still have chances to guaranteed positions in quarterfinals. That's my thinking.

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Korea
    Posts
    2,406
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 2cents
    This is unexplainable from statistics normal distribution.
    ...
    For non-seeded CHN players, 6 out of 7 in the upper half, while only 1 in the bottom half. The chance for this happening is about 4%.
    Read you statistics textbook again. The only time you can expect a normal distribution is with a large sample size. You're talking about a sample size of exactly 1(one)! One tournament looks suspect. Do some research and plot the distribution of top/bottom half ratios of Chinese entries and then start drawing conclusions about this so-called "human factor" (aka bias). On the other hand, if you wish to look at the individual selection, supposedly random, of Chinese players, you're looking at a sample size of 7, maximum. Still not enough to expect a normal distribution.
    Last edited by event; 10-07-2006 at 07:24 PM.

  7. #7
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Korea
    Posts
    2,406
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    In the Japan Open, you have a ratio of 4:3 bottom half to top half, including 2:1 among unseeded players. That sample size of 3 is not statistically significant but neither is 7, sadly. If you're suspecting bias, though, keep going until you've got a sufficiently large sample.

  8. #8
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Vacation Home @ Disney World
    Posts
    2,198
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I have to point out that, event, you misunderstood normal distribution. This forum is not about statistics, I'm sorry to talk about it a little bit. however I would like to just give you some hints to understand what I'm talking about.

    Whether or not should be in normal distribution, depends on the intrinsic of the physics process. Not the sample size. Sample size will determine the parameters, which shapes the bell curve. The true normal distribution intrinsic property is the equal chance, or absolutely random. Like in the theory of error, the random error is normal distribution, no matter you measure just once, or ten thousand times. While the system error is not a normal distribution, no matter how many times you measured.

    6 of 7 on one side, the other 1 of 7 on the other side, which is good enough. For example, common sense, if you pick a ball blindly from a bag which has only black and white balls. Say you pick 7 times, and 6 times you got a black ball, only 1 time you got white ball. Is that enough to disapprove that there are equal number of black and white balls in the bag? Well, we still cannot 100% disapprove, but we can disapprove at p value of 5%, which means 95% confidence(of course this is not accurate, just use it for common sense). There are a lot tests for the normality tests, such as normal probability plot, Jarque-Bera test,...
    Last edited by 2cents; 10-07-2006 at 08:17 PM.

  9. #9
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Korea
    Posts
    2,406
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I didn't misunderstand normal distribution. You are correct that if you draw one ball out of a balanced bag blindly seven times you have 128 colour permutations and only 7 of those are going to be exactly six of one colour and one of the the other. So only a 5% chance of getting that outcome. Do the same experiment 100 times, and you'd expect to get an outcome like that only 5 times. Do the experiment once, and you get only one of 128 possible outcomes. If you want us to believe there is bias, show us a pattern of hometown players getting stacked in one half of their home tournament draws.

  10. #10
    New Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    delft
    Posts
    2
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yay....statistics....!!!!!! (always hate this course )

  11. #11
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    KL & Sg
    Posts
    5,315
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Agree with event here. 2cents, your understanding of statistics is somewhat inaccurate.

  12. #12
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Cambridge, UK
    Posts
    2,360
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    What? 6 in top-half and 3 in bottom-half why? They just don't want China to dominate the world of badminton

  13. #13
    Regular Member jug8man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    2,098
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    What ever you guys say............. I don't think Andrew Smith will fall on the first round to the Chinese Player 'You Hao'.

    Any takers????

    TBBMBB(N)

  14. #14
    Regular Member jug8man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    2,098
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The Funny thing about stats.... assuming this is an actual honest draw.

    1) You get a lopsided natural & unmanipulated random draw result like this and statiscians call it BIASED.

    2) You manipulate a draw so that it goes fairly down the middle and call it UNBIASED.

    Its a funny world we live in.

    TBBMBB(N)

  15. #15
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Cambridge, UK
    Posts
    2,360
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jug8man
    What ever you guys say............. I don't think Andrew Smith will fall on the first round to the Chinese Player 'You Hao'.

    Any takers????

    TBBMBB(N)
    I hope he doesn't fallonthe first round too! But you never know how good the Chinese players are, they never played international!
    BTW, what does TBBMBB(N)

  16. #16
    Regular Member jug8man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    2,098
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Baderz_Jas
    I hope he doesn't fallonthe first round too! But you never know how good the Chinese players are, they never played international!
    BTW, what does TBBMBB(N)

    Hello

    this is short for :
    The Big Bad Mean Borneon BaddyNut.

    This short form version was given by hcyong, another BadmintonCentral member.

    Well, Andrew Smith did beat Sato Shoji earlier this year... So my $$$ is on him.


    TBBMBB(N)
    har har

  17. #17
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Cambridge, UK
    Posts
    2,360
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Thumbs up Hahaha!!! :)

    Quote Originally Posted by jug8man
    Hello

    this is short for :
    The Big Bad Mean Borneon BaddyNut.

    This short form version was given by hcyong, another BadmintonCentral member.

    Well, Andrew Smith did beat Sato Shoji earlier this year... So my $$$ is on him.


    TBBMBB(N)
    har har
    oh i see! hahahah Go Andrew Smith!

    thanks
    Baderz_Jas

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 480
    : 10-30-2013, 02:10 AM
  2. Replies: 2
    : 02-06-2010, 12:48 AM
  3. Shocking discovery:we are human bacteria hybrid
    By taneepak in forum Chit-Chat
    Replies: 4
    : 05-12-2008, 04:29 PM
  4. Human Tail?
    By ants in forum Chit-Chat
    Replies: 3
    : 09-07-2007, 03:41 AM
  5. The Human Side of Ogura, Shiota & Hirose
    By smashmouth in forum Thailand Open 2007 / China Open (1) 2007 / Philippines Open 2007
    Replies: 20
    : 07-27-2007, 04:56 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •