The Ti-10 isn't really a direct improvement of the Cab 8, i'm just saying that because i find that the Ti-10 and the Cab 8 had similar effects when they were released to players like us. The Cab 8 for 1 is a racket that many people used in the past that i should think some people still use 2day, i still use mine occasionally. This Cab 8 has stood in the market for a long time now and has just been re-released. The Ti-10 seems to be a racket that is good in almost everyway for many people, like the Cab 8 in the past. It seems to generally be better than the MP100 in terms of durability. so many more people like the Ti-10. I feel that the Ti-10 will stay in the market for a long time. even after the MP and Ti stuff has been well worn out....... These 2 rackets, Cab 8 and Ti-10 are the 2 rackets that i feel are the 2 best rackets that Yonex have made for their respective times......
Byro. very much so. but i believe the rackets from Yonex that can be called "classics" are: cab8 cab20 iso800 Ti-10
does classics mean it is no doubt the best? which cab 20 is the best ?tour /power/long/regular/tour special.....
What abt Cab 21? dont u guys think it is a clasic piece to. i thought it was synonymus to say Cab 20 and 21. And i think that byro got it spot on.
Hmm .... I would say for Yonex, Carbonex 8 (Original) ( 20 years and going ) Carbonex 20 (Original) ( 15 years) Carbonex 21 (Original) ( 15 years and going ) ISO 800 (No idea how long .. ) Ti-10 (2U-Long) ( ... and going ... ) Slim-10 ? I cannot agree to that as logevity is also an important trait of 'classics'. It was in production for less than 2 years.
