anyone serve to the back low in doubles?

**yy_ling** · 11-25-2006, 12:59 AM

anyone do a low serve to the back in doubles?

**__Lam** · 11-25-2006, 01:03 AM

Originally Posted by yy_ling

anyone do a low serve to the back in doubles?

a drive serve?

**yy_ling** · 11-25-2006, 01:42 AM

im trying to invent a new tactic, where by you keep driving both your opponents to one side and finally cross court, when I work it out I'll scan the disgram and post it here, the drive serve is something Im thinking of, I just need some comments about this drive serve guys pls reply about this who does it and how about it, in the meantime I'll work on the tactic

**DinkAlot** · 11-25-2006, 02:02 AM

Originally Posted by yy_ling

im trying to invent a new tactic

Badminton's been around for a while. Inventing a "new" tactic maybe hard.

**Pete LSD** · 11-25-2006, 02:09 AM

Hmmm, your tactic really depends on the speed of your opponents. Your opponents can return the favour if they are faster than you.

Originally Posted by yy_ling

im trying to invent a new tactic, where by you keep driving both your opponents to one side and finally cross court, when I work it out I'll scan the disgram and post it here, the drive serve is something Im thinking of, I just need some comments about this drive serve guys pls reply about this who does it and how about it, in the meantime I'll work on the tactic

**Pete LSD** · 11-25-2006, 02:10 AM

Who says it is hard? Just ask CD. He can reduce his COG to nothing.

Originally Posted by DinkAlot

Badminton's been around for a while. Inventing a "new" tactic maybe hard.

**DinkAlot** · 11-25-2006, 02:12 AM

Originally Posted by Pete LSD

Who says it is hard? Just ask CD. He can reduce his COG to nothing.

But CD is the BC Hero or Heroes. He doesnt' count.

**yy_ling** · 11-25-2006, 02:20 AM

Who is CD... anyway thats why I want to come out with a tactic that is still partially effective even if given fast opponents.

**yy_ling** · 11-25-2006, 02:21 AM

well dinkalot is a big figure in BC, for cracked frames, shafts, snapped rackets, over tensioning, and high speed stringing

anyway i tried out just now and also drew a few diagrams, I realised that if you serve from the front, its not as easy to drive serve as from the back, server behind has disadvantages, however i dunno if this is legal, but having the server behind and the partnet at the front to block the servers racket(if being someone with bigger built), in this way the receiver will not be able to determine the servers intentions.

**DinkAlot** · 11-25-2006, 02:23 AM

Originally Posted by yy_ling

Who is CD... anyway thats why I want to come out with a tactic that is still partially effective even if given fast opponents.

CD = CoolDoob.

Against fast opponents is tough, against advanced fast opponents even tougher.

**Pete LSD** · 11-25-2006, 02:30 AM

From the description given below, are you planning to play mixed double games with your (same S E X as you) partner?

Originally Posted by yy_ling

well dinkalot is a big figure in BC, for cracked frames, shafts, snapped rackets, over tensioning, and high speed stringing

anyway i tried out just now and also drew a few diagrams, I realised that if you serve from the front, its not as easy to drive serve as from the back, server behind has disadvantages, however i dunno if this is legal, but having the server behind and the partnet at the front to block the servers racket(if being someone with bigger built), in this way the receiver will not be able to determine the servers intentions.

**yy_ling** · 11-25-2006, 02:36 AM

Originally Posted by Pete LSD

From the description given below, are you planning to mixed double games with your (same S E X as you) partner?

what do you mean by that, I dont really have a partner my friends all dont really reached the stage where you are so hardcore to think of such a thing well I'll be happy to find a partner

all im saying is that, serving from behind, to have your partner infront blocking your racket off, it can reduce the receivers field of view

**Pete LSD** · 11-25-2006, 02:40 AM

Sounds like mixed double

.

Originally Posted by yy_ling

what do you mean by that, I dont really have a partner my friends all dont really reached the stage where you are so hardcore to think of such a thing well I'll be happy to find a partner

all im saying is that, serving from behind, to have your partner infront blocking your racket off, it can reduce the receivers field of view

**DinkAlot** · 11-25-2006, 02:41 AM

Originally Posted by yy_ling

all im saying is that, serving from behind, to have your partner infront blocking your racket off, it can reduce the receivers field of view

You are susceptible to a few things, corner drop, the push to the deep corners and even a deep push straight back.

**yy_ling** · 11-25-2006, 02:49 AM

so we can have the partner take up front position straight away and server take the back, if you want to have side by side position then...just move there

also Im not sure if you guys are already doing this, but i realised that when pushing aiming for your opponents forehand side's armpit is ideal way to jam his movements

lol im quite crazy nowadays im thinking of this weird stuff...

**yy_ling** · 11-25-2006, 02:58 AM

Originally Posted by DinkAlot

You are susceptible to a few things, corner drop, the push to the deep corners and even a deep push straight back.

even if saying corner drop, the angle from the drive serve doesnt let him make a tight one does he? i mean having a flat serve to the back, he is not able to generate tighter angles for a drop

**DinkAlot** · 11-25-2006, 03:41 AM

Originally Posted by yy_ling

even if saying corner drop, the angle from the drive serve doesnt let him make a tight one does he? i mean having a flat serve to the back, he is not able to generate tighter angles for a drop

Absolutely possible. Regardless, you do your thing and hope it works.