Strange String Tension Measurement?

Discussion in 'Badminton String' started by Lone Dealer, Dec 10, 2006.

  1. Lone Dealer

    Lone Dealer New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2006
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Brunei
    Hi, I'm not sure if anyone knows about this, but where I'm from, Brunei, many of the badminton stringers aren't familiar with measuring string tension by lbs (pounds), but instead use another measurement for string tension... quoting strange numbers such as 68, 70?

    I've asked around and it seems the norm to use this "system" rather than lbs. Some tell me that 70 equates to about 24lbs...

    Is anyone familiar with this? Is there a "conversion scale" between the two? I have found a stringer that understands when tell him to string it at "24lbs" but I'm pretty curious about this peculiarity.

    Thanks!
     
  2. DinkAlot

    DinkAlot dcbadminton
    Brand Representative

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2005
    Messages:
    12,682
    Likes Received:
    290
    Occupation:
    Social Distancing Specialist
    Location:
    Southern California
    Well, 70/24 = 2.91666667 : 1lb. ratio. I don't know anything with that ratio for conversion.
     
  3. jerby

    jerby Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2005
    Messages:
    4,123
    Likes Received:
    32
    Location:
    EU
    I believe I read about it in the forums..

    it goes like this:
    the stringing machines of old could go as high as 35lbs...and they makr the rod percentageswise:
    70 = 70% of maximum...

    what is the maximum? I don't know...I thought it was 35lbs...
     
  4. Lone Dealer

    Lone Dealer New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2006
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Brunei
    That seems to make sense.... 70% of 35lbs = 24.5lbs which seems consistent.

    At least it'll make sense when other people tell me they've got "65" or "72" etc as their tension. :D
     
  5. DinkAlot

    DinkAlot dcbadminton
    Brand Representative

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2005
    Messages:
    12,682
    Likes Received:
    290
    Occupation:
    Social Distancing Specialist
    Location:
    Southern California
    Yep, same here, assuming 35lbs. is max and you are stringing at a percentage of that.

    Good detective work Jerry!
     
  6. Smichz

    Smichz Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2006
    Messages:
    3,385
    Likes Received:
    1
    Occupation:
    Student,Tour guide,Marketer
    Location:
    Beijing,Guilin,K.L & Jakarta
    i wonder what racket could actually hold a 35 lbs tension.And probably it'll last less than a week,and it definitely reqiures a bulk of energy to play with it..
     
  7. LazyBuddy

    LazyBuddy Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    10,096
    Likes Received:
    15
    Occupation:
    Engineer
    Location:
    New York, US
    Quite a percent of pros do play with 30+ lbs. Of course, such tension is not recommended to average club level of players or anyone afraid of the racket clashes. ;)
     
  8. LazyBuddy

    LazyBuddy Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    10,096
    Likes Received:
    15
    Occupation:
    Engineer
    Location:
    New York, US
    This seems make sense. The numerical value not necessarily go with any legit unit. It could be just a "mark" for the stringers to go with, as long as s/he use the marks in a consistant base.

    Such marks (or conversion table) is still widely used in many "tennis converted to badminton" string machines (mostly drop weight type). :)
     
  9. morewood

    morewood Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2006
    Messages:
    545
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    UK, Derbys.
    doesn’t sound precise, kgs/m or lbs/ft work or if you want to be nerdy I suppose newtons would be a valid measurement
     
  10. DinkAlot

    DinkAlot dcbadminton
    Brand Representative

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2005
    Messages:
    12,682
    Likes Received:
    290
    Occupation:
    Social Distancing Specialist
    Location:
    Southern California
    No one said this measurement was precise, only a guesstimate. :p
     
  11. DinkAlot

    DinkAlot dcbadminton
    Brand Representative

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2005
    Messages:
    12,682
    Likes Received:
    290
    Occupation:
    Social Distancing Specialist
    Location:
    Southern California
    Believe it or not, quite a few rackets can take 35lbs. It takes a good stringer. :)
     
  12. cooler

    cooler Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2002
    Messages:
    21,811
    Likes Received:
    23
    Occupation:
    Surfing, reading fan mails:D, Dilithium Crystal hu
    Location:
    Basement Boiler Room
    pete lsd had his up to 32-33 lbs using constant pull for a while already
     
  13. DinkAlot

    DinkAlot dcbadminton
    Brand Representative

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2005
    Messages:
    12,682
    Likes Received:
    290
    Occupation:
    Social Distancing Specialist
    Location:
    Southern California
    Yep, that's like 34-35lbs. on my crankie-crankie machine.
     
  14. jerby

    jerby Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2005
    Messages:
    4,123
    Likes Received:
    32
    Location:
    EU
    wait, everybody agrees with me?
    what's wrong with you people!;)

    on a sidenote...I tought I heard some (unknown, new) member say he strung his at700 up to 38lbs...but didn't play with it..
     
  15. DinkAlot

    DinkAlot dcbadminton
    Brand Representative

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2005
    Messages:
    12,682
    Likes Received:
    290
    Occupation:
    Social Distancing Specialist
    Location:
    Southern California
    Well, I have to agree with you because I can't come up with anything better nor do I want to try. :p
     
  16. jerby

    jerby Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2005
    Messages:
    4,123
    Likes Received:
    32
    Location:
    EU
    agreeing by default...
    sure, now I feel much better....

    ;)
     

Share This Page