User Tag List

Page 108 of 326 FirstFirst ... 8 58 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 158 208 ... LastLast
Results 1,820 to 1,836 of 5535

Thread: APACS fan club

  1. #1820
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    nz
    Posts
    5
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i love these apacs rackets ever since i bought ES108, Nano900 Power white and red. especially the ES108 and Nano900 Power white, excellent rackets.

  2. #1821
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    sf bay
    Posts
    59
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Does the Nano 900 white have better material or Nano 9900? Any one have Fullerene?

  3. #1822
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    1,271
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by firearc View Post
    Does the Nano 900 white have better material or Nano 9900? Any one have Fullerene?
    I doubt that the apacs clone rackets would use fullerene, or any fancy materials. however, they are decently solid rackets.

  4. #1823
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    malaysia
    Posts
    9
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default tantrum, lethal or visible hollow?

    hi, i am new here.. i recently broke my racquet and i wana buy a new one..
    Interested in Apacs (for its reasonable price), i come down to these 3 racquets:

    Lethal 50
    Visible hollow 1800
    Tantrum 200

    can i know how these 3 racquet differ from one another? please?

  5. #1824
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    1,271
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    look here for the answer

  6. #1825
    Regular Member Mark A's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    St Helens, UK
    Posts
    4,080
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Lethal 70 and Tantrum 300

    My alternate racket is now definitely going to be a SOTX Woven 5 (in some form or other), but I'm considering an APACS for my primary. Winston of MBS has informed me of the forthcoming Lethal 70 and Tantrum 300 - are these similar to the 50 and 200, respectively? I'm drawn to these two because of their stiffness and doubles balance.

  7. #1826
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Leicester, UK
    Posts
    27
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I know that the apacs original line all have their own technologies, but do the clones have the same technologies as their yonex copies?
    I'd probably expect not but i'm not sure, i think there may of been a answer in this thread but the search shows nothing ;/

    Right now i'm sticking to the original line as i've ordered an amp95 and lethal50, still waiting for delivery but it'll be worth my first taste of high end apacs rackets.

  8. #1827
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    94
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default hi

    May I Know Where I Can Buy Apacs In Kl , At Cheaper Price?

  9. #1828
    New Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Hi, this is my new and first post here. Why here? It's because I brought the AP Wave Power 100 (string at 27lbs) yesterday at Puchong and straight went to play at MBA hall.

    A bit history, this is my 2nd racket, my first racket was YY Carbonex 10 (many years ago), the reason I buy a new one is due to newer tech on capability to string highier tension and the head shape, and it can save tax deduction on sports ware :P

    Ok, switch to court experiencing of new racket. First match, lousy feel, not able to perform well as expected, you might be thinking I am complaining over here.. No, it is expected, that no matter how skillful a player is, when changing a racket, there are sure not able to get used to it at beginning, so we can't give a fair review on any new racket just by playing few hours in court.

    So, hold on to the principle "Human (you/me) are the most dynamic tool in the court, not the racket nor the shoes, thus, racket is just a dead tool, and you are the person who can self adjust to any racket no matter what's the brand are."

    I played a few matches, and finally get to know and adjust my hand movement, strength to the new racket, and getting more performance out of it in later games.

    AP wave power 100 is a heavy guy, 90gram (2U), wow is it nut?? I know some players are tends to "the lighter the better" concept, well I would say, it's up to your preference and play style, I use to play squash + badminton weekly and 90 gram to me is consider "lighter" comparing to my squash racket.

    So far, I haven't got enough play hours to squish out the juice of the racket, not much review feedback on it yet. My summary is, there are no "fans" of any brand racket, the only fans is to yourself, because you are the most useful tool in the court, find a racket that suits your play style and adjust to it, love it and seek out the attributes of the racket, then you and your racket will become ONE (sounds like fiction story)..

  10. #1829
    Regular Member Badmintan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    AMK (Singapore)
    Posts
    998
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Specs

    Hi,

    I just want to get this right, please feedback if it's wrong.

    (partly based on reading DinkAlot's review)

    AMP95 = head heavy-/extra stiff

    Lethal 60 = head heavy-/extra stiff

    Tantrum 200 = head heavy-/extra stiff

    Visible hollow 1800 = head heavy-/extra stiff

  11. #1830
    Moderator Oldhand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Asia
    Posts
    7,328
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by UKPav View Post
    I know that the apacs original line all have their own technologies, but do the clones have the same technologies as their yonex copies?
    I'd probably expect not but i'm not sure, i think there may of been a answer in this thread but the search shows nothing ;/

    Right now i'm sticking to the original line as i've ordered an amp95 and lethal50, still waiting for delivery but it'll be worth my first taste of high end apacs rackets.
    No, they don't.

    The clones are 'lookalikes'.
    They are very different from the Yonex equivalents

  12. #1831
    Regular Member george@chongwei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    MIA
    Posts
    29,945
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I wonder when will Apacs make a clone racket of lin dan's li ning racket?
    i will surely buy it and i'm sure those who doesnt own a li ning's product will surely buy it..

  13. #1832
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    sg
    Posts
    120
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Oldhand View Post
    No, they don't.

    The clones are 'lookalikes'.
    They are very different from the Yonex equivalents

    This thread is very misleading indeed!
    There are alot of Apacs fans in this thread saying that apacs clones are as good as yonex and cost alot cheaper than Yonex.

    And now we have our very own oldhand saying "the clones are just lookalikes"

  14. #1833
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Berkeley California
    Posts
    215
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Badmintan View Post
    Hi,

    I just want to get this right, please feedback if it's wrong.

    (partly based on reading DinkAlot's review)

    AMP95 = head heavy-/extra stiff

    Lethal 60 = head heavy-/extra stiff

    Tantrum 200 = head heavy-/extra stiff

    Visible hollow 1800 = head heavy-/extra stiff
    DinkALot didn't review the Lethal 60, only the Lethal 50.

    I believe that all of those racquets are only moderately head heavy. I saw some talk that the new AMP95's are less head heavy than the old ones.

    And according to DinkALot's review, the VH1800 and Tantrum 200 are slightly less stiff than the Lethal 50 and AMP95 (Stiff+ instead of Very Stiff-)

  15. #1834
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Berkeley California
    Posts
    215
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by xuguochuan View Post
    This thread is very misleading indeed!
    There are alot of Apacs fans in this thread saying that apacs clones are as good as yonex and cost alot cheaper than Yonex.

    And now we have our very own oldhand saying "the clones are just lookalikes"
    That's the nature of any forum. Each person delivers their own opinion and it's up to the reader to sort out all of the conflicting opinions

    My synthesis of this thread would be summerized like this, "The APACS clones provide 2/3 to 3/4 of Yonex quality at 1/4 the price. The APACS original racquets provide full Yonex quality at 1/2 the price."

  16. #1835
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    sg
    Posts
    120
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by weinsteinium View Post
    That's the nature of any forum. Each person delivers their own opinion and it's up to the reader to sort out all of the conflicting opinions

    My synthesis of this thread would be summerized like this, "The APACS clones provide 2/3 to 3/4 of Yonex quality at 1/4 the price. The APACS original racquets provide full Yonex quality at 1/2 the price."
    full yonex quality at 1/2 the price
    which model

    can any apacs original racquets provide full yonex carbonex 8 quality at half the price? (for your inform - carbonex 8 cost less than sgd $50)

    which apacs original racquets cost less than sgd $25?
    so cheap?
    Last edited by xuguochuan; 07-25-2009 at 01:08 PM.

  17. #1836
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Berkeley California
    Posts
    215
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by xuguochuan View Post
    full yonex quality at 1/2 the price
    which model

    can any apacs original racquets provide full yonex carbonex 8 quality at half the price? (for your inform - carbonex 8 cost less than sgd $50)

    which apacs original racquets cost less than sgd $25?
    so cheap?
    Errr, I guess my statement really meant, "The APACS clones provide 2/3 to 3/4 of Yonex quality at 1/4 the price. The APACS original racquets provide full top-of-the-line Yonex quality at 1/2 the price."

    So a racquet like the Visible Hollow 1800, Lethal 50 or Tantrum 200 cost about 1/2 of what a Yonex Nanospeed 9900 or an Arcsaber 10 cost (in the USA at least).

    I'm not sure what prices are like in Singapore but maybe someone can price check a Nano 900 Power or something like that. Some of the APACS racquets on ebay are as cheap as US$25 but that's quite a bit more than SGD$25.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    : 04-14-2012, 03:08 AM
  2. Replies: 2
    : 07-18-2011, 10:38 AM
  3. Replies: 55
    : 10-21-2008, 10:52 AM
  4. Badminton Club (Should i stay/move on to another club)
    By !┐Clue?! in forum General Forum
    Replies: 8
    : 10-15-2008, 01:20 AM
  5. Replies: 1
    : 08-23-2006, 10:14 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •