Results 3,486 to 3,502 of 5464
Thread: APACS fan club
10-14-2010, 01:07 PM #3486
10-14-2010, 02:39 PM #3487
10-14-2010, 03:24 PM #3488
10-14-2010, 03:33 PM #3489
10-14-2010, 04:07 PM #3490
Well I ordered in the past from him and I had a fast service. Nothing to blame but I looked on this forum and saw some negative comment on him. I hope I'll have my rackets without trouble.
I'm sure he is selling good on eBay and that he therefor sometimes cannot fullfil the demand as he should.
10-14-2010, 04:12 PM #3491
10-14-2010, 04:31 PM #3492
10-14-2010, 05:45 PM #3493
APACS Rackets from Racket-Sports
10-14-2010, 05:56 PM #3494
Id say im a beginner/intermediate player, looking to upgrade from my flexible racket so something stiffer (played with YY stiff just fine).
Play singles and doubles, not developed into attacking or defensive although would definitely prefer to be attacking the other player than just taking their hard shots. Want a racket thats easier to hit further, still ok for doubles.
Not sure between Nano 900 Power Red/White, Lethal 50/70/90, Tantrum 200/300
10-14-2010, 06:03 PM #3495
10-14-2010, 06:05 PM #3496
People seem to say Lethal 70 is slightly head heavier than Tantrum 200 but not much difference. And I know Nano 900 Red is head heavier but somewhat lower down than the Lethal 70.
10-14-2010, 10:38 PM #3497
I'm playing badminton with Nano 900 power now. It's quite good at attacking and defensing. Good attacking due to head heavy while defensing is because of 4U weight balance which is lighter than YY 3U and heavier than YY 4U. It's suitable for beginner/intermediate player.
Nano 900power almost upgrades me from lower intermediate to higher intermediate. It's truth.
Btw, if u r powerful enough, u can try Nano900 Tech. It's said Nano900T is head heavier than Nano900P.
As for Lethal 70, I just try on my friend's one for a while, no commence.
Actually there is no best racket but most suitable one for yourself. Nano 900 power is suitable for most of people, some of my friends all use it, I think u also can try it.
10-15-2010, 12:27 AM #3498
I won my first tournament with the Lethal60 a year ago and it's a very good racket. Now I'm waiting for the T200 and VH2000 to see how these play
I heard alot of good things so I'm curious
10-15-2010, 12:39 AM #3499
I'm waiting for them to make a 45LB tension tantrum lol. Really i should just get a Tantrum, but the 45lb tension marketing gimmick really gets me.. For 1 i don't understand why 1 can take 10 lb more tension. reading from spec its just the titanium added ? for something to go from 30 or 35 to 45 lb tension is almost a doubling of the strength even though the result is just 30% increase.
And to go into more detail the lethal 70 i hear is in 4U, while tantrum is 3U.. so i think it can be done with the technology now.. just not sure how a balanced lethal would play and maybe surpass the current tantrum even?
10-15-2010, 05:35 AM #3500
even if 1 of them is head heavier, then it should be N900P Red since it clones the YY AT900P.
N900P is really a good clone from Apacs. but too bad they only come in 4u. if they're in 3u, they would be even more powerful.
a 4u Lethal is like YY JP coded products in Malaysia..rare gem. lol
10-15-2010, 11:40 PM #3501
I also made a quick comparison review between APACS Tantrum 200 and Lethal 60 and posted here : http://www.badmintoncentral.com/foru...iew&highlight=
10-16-2010, 08:37 AM #3502
Anyone try Apacs new racket Slayer 99 ? I thinking to get one, please give some opinion.
By ranjitp1 in forum IndiaReplies: 1: 04-14-2012, 03:08 AM
By Trilan in forum EuropeReplies: 2: 07-18-2011, 10:38 AM
By Jinryu in forum Canada EastReplies: 55: 10-21-2008, 10:52 AM
By !┐Clue?! in forum General ForumReplies: 8: 10-15-2008, 01:20 AM
By dex in forum Canada EastReplies: 1: 08-23-2006, 10:14 PM