User Tag List

Page 292 of 334 FirstFirst ... 192 242 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 ... LastLast
Results 4,948 to 4,964 of 5667

Thread: APACS fan club

  1. #4948
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Melaka
    Posts
    192
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Saladz View Post
    Hi guys, i am a beginner and i am wondering which model to get:

    1) Apac Edgesaber Z Slayer
    2) Apac Edgesaber 10
    3) Apac Nano 9900
    4) Apac Nano 900 Power

    If possible, please include explanation as to why the one that is chosen is superior to the others, thanks in advance!
    Reviews I've read on BC
    1- small frame, some say vibrates some say don't have ==
    2- people say not nice at all
    3- nice racket
    4- stiff, slight head heavy

  2. #4949
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    12
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by icecoldcoke View Post
    Reviews I've read on BC
    1- small frame, some say vibrates some say don't have ==
    2- people say not nice at all
    3- nice racket
    4- stiff, slight head heavy
    I guess it boils down to option 1 and 3 then. Do you have any personal experience with both of them?

  3. #4950
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Holland
    Posts
    3,977
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'm stringing the entire Finapi Range for a friend of mine, I have the Finapi 30,33,70,80, 232 and 252. But they're all the same medium-stiff, 4U, Even balanced rackets, just different types of frame...

    What are your thoughts about the Finapi Series? Just bang-for-buck? Or quality stuff like the Tantrums, Lethal 60,70,90,100 and tweets?

  4. #4951
    New Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Kuala Lumpur
    Posts
    2
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    looking to buy nano fusion speed 722 since my old one broke in a clash T.T... I noe its an old model.. been deperately trying to find it everywhere to no avail.. i live near kl btw.. help,anyone???

  5. #4952
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    76
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Should be able to get them in Malaysia. http://www.lelong.com.my/apacs-nano-...-01-Sale-I.htm

  6. #4953
    New Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Kuala Lumpur
    Posts
    2
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aloy66 View Post
    Should be able to get them in Malaysia. http://www.lelong.com.my/apacs-nano-...-01-Sale-I.htm
    hi aloy ^^ i came across this link before.. id prefer if i could personally go to the store and get my hands on it before buying it.. juz a personal preference but thanks anyway.. ^^

  7. #4954
    Regular Member BlueTornado's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Bay Area, USA
    Posts
    793
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jerby View Post
    I'm stringing the entire Finapi Range for a friend of mine, I have the Finapi 30,33,70,80, 232 and 252. But they're all the same medium-stiff, 4U, Even balanced rackets, just different types of frame...

    What are your thoughts about the Finapi Series? Just bang-for-buck? Or quality stuff like the Tantrums, Lethal 60,70,90,100 and tweets?
    From what I've heard the Finapi series are just inexpensive graphite rackets. I also heard that the Tweet rackets are not really "quality stuff" like you mentioned. The L100 didn't get such good reviews either.

    T200/300 and L60/70 are very good for sure though. L90 is okay, but just a Victor Bravesword knockoff.

  8. #4955
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Melaka
    Posts
    192
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Saladz View Post
    I guess it boils down to option 1 and 3 then. Do you have any personal experience with both of them?
    I've only tried the nano 9900 power (not nano 9900 without the power) it feels balanced and a bit flexible..

  9. #4956
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Holland
    Posts
    3,977
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlueTornado View Post
    From what I've heard the Finapi series are just inexpensive graphite rackets. I also heard that the Tweet rackets are not really "quality stuff" like you mentioned. The L100 didn't get such good reviews either.

    T200/300 and L60/70 are very good for sure though. L90 is okay, but just a Victor Bravesword knockoff.
    I think I disagree with you on the Tweets, the 6000 and 7000 didn't get great marks from 1-2 people, as did the tantrum 500. But the T500 was great and the tweet 6k was pretty decent (it felt more like a headheavy midflex 4U to me, despite what the stats say)

    I want to test them all out (for fun), but my expectations for the Finapi's aren't that high now

  10. #4957
    Regular Member BlueTornado's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Bay Area, USA
    Posts
    793
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jerby View Post
    I think I disagree with you on the Tweets, the 6000 and 7000 didn't get great marks from 1-2 people, as did the tantrum 500. But the T500 was great and the tweet 6k was pretty decent (it felt more like a headheavy midflex 4U to me, despite what the stats say)

    I want to test them all out (for fun), but my expectations for the Finapi's aren't that high now
    Ah okay, of course I may be wrong as my knowledge of the Tweets and T500 is merely hearsay.

    The Finapi's shouldn't be bad at fulfilling their function as Yonex look-a-like's / inexpensive graphite rackets, but I don't think one should expect that they be high end rackets

  11. #4958
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Kuchai Lama
    Posts
    23
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    anyone using Slayer?

  12. #4959
    Regular Member P8nguin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    SGP
    Posts
    78
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Appealing to bros here, which should I get - T200 or latest Lethal 110? Understand both are stiff & HH, many rave reviews already for T200/300 but I'm caught with this new L110... Hope someone has tried both & could offer me a comparison/advice

  13. #4960
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    84
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Get the T110, it's more fun with it. I sold my T200 and stayed happy with the L110. Although L70 is still the most powerful.

  14. #4961
    Regular Member P8nguin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    SGP
    Posts
    78
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RocKai View Post
    Get the T110, it's more fun with it. I sold my T200 and stayed happy with the L110. Although L70 is still the most powerful.
    Thanks for your advice Care to share a little with your new found weapon? What's so gd/special over T200? Thanks

  15. #4962
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    84
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I can tell you that the L110 is more balanced, lighter, and medium flex. It produces similar power to the T200 but it's faster swing, easier to manoeuvre, better defense, and more control at the net.

    Oh, and did I mention it's yellow?

  16. #4963
    Regular Member P8nguin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    SGP
    Posts
    78
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RocKai View Post
    I can tell you that the L110 is more balanced, lighter, and medium flex. It produces similar power to the T200 but it's faster swing, easier to manoeuvre, better defense, and more control at the net.

    Oh, and did I mention it's yellow?
    Oh dear... there it comes again... "mid Flex"!! I'm always very sceptical with Apacs each time they claimed "Stiff". I had a T500 once before but didn't like it, too flex for me. Thus I need to check with BC pals 1st before buying another Apacs. Perhaps I should stick with well tested T200 or L70 since I enjoy stiff + HH ones.

  17. #4964
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    84
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Trust me, L70 is definitely stiff and HH, beast combination, best racket of Apacs period. Unfortunately I broke the handle of it and switched back to my old trusty Armor Muscle Pro 90 and it's still very good to play.

    And the L110 would still be stiff if someone is not used to stiff racket.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    : 04-14-2012, 04:08 AM
  2. Replies: 2
    : 07-18-2011, 11:38 AM
  3. Replies: 55
    : 10-21-2008, 11:52 AM
  4. Badminton Club (Should i stay/move on to another club)
    By !┐Clue?! in forum General Forum
    Replies: 8
    : 10-15-2008, 02:20 AM
  5. Replies: 1
    : 08-23-2006, 11:14 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •