Results 1,021 to 1,037 of 5418
Thread: APACS fan club
10-16-2008, 04:41 AM #1021
Hmmm, I think my friend paid lower than that in JB. Rm$170 ? I remember convert to Singapore $ not more than 80 for two.
10-16-2008, 04:56 AM #1022
Yah, that's the standard price.. I bought in JB, for RM164 racquets only, then with two acepower grips and one BG80, one BG66 came up to RM 206
Edit: btw, i bought ES10 and Nano900 Power Also!!! What a coincidence! I love the Nano 900 Power...
10-16-2008, 06:04 AM #1023
Nano900power really so good? Haha. I see many apacs nano900power praise that racket.. As for me, I like nano900power too.. I tot is because I bought it, so I must like it. But after all, I see other people review also the same. The thing which I confuse is, between nano900power white and red, izit is the same? Only the colour shceme is different right? Cause I play with nano900 red, it exactly same feel with my white nano900.
10-16-2008, 06:06 AM #1024
APACS racket review
Thanks for the feedback. That is very good & informative & if more others contribute too, we can all study & enjoy the share experiences.
Would you say it is an even balance racket or head heavy?
Does enlarging he grib change the balence on the racket?
10-16-2008, 11:46 AM #1025
The red one has a box frame, and obviously it's red... and head heavy
The white one has the 'aerodynamic' frame... more like wings... and obviously is white.. and i feel less head heavy... I think next month maybe i will get another pair of nano900power hahaha... it's affordable!
10-16-2008, 11:48 AM #1026
Well, it is head heavy, and pretty obvious at that. The racquet is a little too light for my liking though, but for the price and considering the fact I am just a recreational player, it feels good enough for me!
I do have two overgrips on it, and it did seem to alter the balance VERY slightly, I can still feel the head-heaviness... But I think this racquet is awesome for smashing, if you have good wrist power!
10-16-2008, 12:31 PM #1027
That is exactly why I think a review table will be most helpful and if all fans just insert their comments there , we can all share.for those who say have the Yonex rackets as well, maybe they can sort of give their comment on the comparison.
The overgrib etc can be inserted too so future buyers can make their own asseessment based on info provided.
Thanks APACS fans*****
10-16-2008, 05:34 PM #1028
Another item we can add to the list for those who will be reviewing:
21) Your numbers of years playing or level (eg 10yrs & intermediate):
10-16-2008, 10:00 PM #1029
thanks guys for the feedback. need it and one more thing, nano900power is the best rather than the es10. after use both of them, i think its worth for money. thanks u so much.
10-17-2008, 12:54 AM #1030
10-19-2008, 12:13 AM #1031
nano900 power (red/white)
i'm also have both nano900 power red n white. both tide up with string on same tension 26lbs, but different string size, 0.70mm & 0.66mm. same grip size 3UG4.
the red nano is really a head heavy recquet, and perform a very sharp smash, offencesive move; the white nano is good on controlling the shuttlecock, drop shot, net ball, defensive move.
i always switch using the 2 racquet during my game, so that i can clearly know the difference btw them.
i do felt the string size (0.70mm or 0.66mm) may effect the different power althought they r tide up with same tension. anyone of you mind to share some expereince??
10-19-2008, 01:19 AM #1032
if compared AMP 90 and Nano 900 power..which have more head heavier?
10-19-2008, 03:02 AM #1033
thicker gauge strings, I have no idea, but I think it will have less repulsion and feel. You won't be able to feel or control the ball as well I think, but if you're pro, you can play good with any strings hah!
10-19-2008, 06:11 AM #1034
so anyone can compared the head heavier between amp90 and nano 900 power (red) ?
10-19-2008, 07:04 AM #1035
I think this question last time had a member ask... AMP90 is more head heavier. Need some member to clarify about this.
10-19-2008, 08:32 AM #1036
AMP90 head heavier, shaft stiffer due to "50-tonne HMG"
10-19-2008, 09:26 AM #1037
What does "50 tonne HMG" signicants have on the shaft?
Could you explain?
Does it mean it is firmer so need good arm/wrist to generate power?
Is the racket shaft amde of less tonne HMG means it is less stiff?
By ranjitp1 in forum IndiaReplies: 1: 04-14-2012, 04:08 AM
By Trilan in forum EuropeReplies: 2: 07-18-2011, 11:38 AM
By Jinryu in forum Canada EastReplies: 55: 10-21-2008, 11:52 AM
By !┐Clue?! in forum General ForumReplies: 8: 10-15-2008, 02:20 AM
By dex in forum Canada EastReplies: 1: 08-23-2006, 11:14 PM