APACS fan club

[clearng]

Wat kind of tension u guy prefer in Apacs racket ?

do u guy make it maximum 30LBS?

lol

for me 28LBS if BG65Ti will be 27LBS

so wat kind of tension u guy prefer ........

[phandrew]

I dropped by 10n10 @Bras Basah complex (Singapore) and saw the Apacs arcsaber7 clone. It has a different name - "NanoSaber7"

how much was the racket?

[punchclear]

how much was the racket?

Nanosaber7 is typically offered at SGD 100, although I hear that the Edgesaber7 retails for half the price in Malaysia.
It is claimed that Nanosaber7 is 'specific' for Singapore market, and is the same as the Edgesaber7 (can't comment further on this, as I don't play either model).

[clearng]

Yonex ARCSAber7 I tried d
not power enough maybe cause of medium stiff flex
but controling is 5star rated
hope APACS NanoSaber7 will be same too

[NiKYEAM]

My coach's supplier lent me a brand new Apacs Furious 633 the other day. It's a new model and I was lent the prototype for testing. He said that if the reviews for the racket were good, he would bring in more of the model for wide-scale distribution. Have throughly tested it out and will post pictures and a review up soon. Really awesome-looking racket! Note, this is newer than the NanoSaber7, which I have also had the luck to test out.

[clearng]

prototype?
hmmnnn..........
he model name maybe will be different form u use after launching in the market

[NiKYEAM]

It is really a nice racket. Can safely say that it's in a totally different level from the NanoSaber 7. In terms of performance for me, I think that this Apacs racket is in a class of its own compared with other rackets from Apacs. At least, that's just my personal opinion. To each his own?

[Smichz]

well,i just found that that the nano900 power(copy of AT900-T)turns out to be a great powerful racket,after it breaks in.

[Hitman71]

well,i just found that that the nano900 power(copy of AT900-T)turns out to be a great powerful racket,after it breaks in.

Hi Smichz, what do you mean by break in ? If I'm not mistaken you also own kason carbon 3.0 right, how does the apac 900 power compare to it ? and last, what string and tension do you use ?

Thanks ..

[Smichz]

Hi Smichz, what do you mean by break in ? If I'm not mistaken you also own kason carbon 3.0 right, how does the apac 900 power compare to it ? and last, what string and tension do you use ?

Thanks ..

"break in" i meant was about when u have ur brand new racket,u have to play sometime before it gets "repulsive".Esp the shaft.The flexibility n repulsion of the shaft.

Yup..u got it rite.Hmm..the stringers n the strings r different,so i guess it's hard to really compare them.Well..i guess each one got their own good n bad.
Both of them were strung at 26X24 lbs,by two different stringer.My kason uses BG65ti,n my Apac 900 power uses NBG95.The tension on my apacs 900 power felt much harder than my kason 3.0.The stringer of my kason 3.0's bad.

All i can say is this..
They're both affordable n in the same price range.Bought them both each around 300RMB,or 40 USD.But they both worthed.The shaft stiffness is similar.The 900 power is slightly head heavier than the kason 3.0.

My kason 3.0's (3U) control n maneuverablity felt much better than the apac.Easier to defense.Power..according to my experience of having this kind of racket twice,this racket is also a monster.It's just that the current tension was poor,so i can't really beat out the power out of it.Wait till i restring next time."..an all round racket.Good for both offensive n defensive"

My Apac900power(4U)..filled with power.Defense r harder than the 3.0,since the head is heavier.29.5cm,while the 3.0 is only around 28-28.5cm.Smashes filled with power,so does clears.Controls?..not bad i would say.It's just that my kason 3.0 got a better one.I also very satisfied with the paint job.It's one of the racket that its paint would last long."An offensive racket."..Too good to be a 4U.I was thinking that it was probably meant to be a 3U.


Why bro?Thinking of getting one of them?

[Hitman71]

Thanks, I didn't know that racket also has a break in period Initially I thought you are refering to the string. hahaha.

Yes, the intention of getting the racket did cross my mind, ( that racket does look good), and its also quite cheap. Once I saw it was on sale two racket, a bag, strings and grip @ RM200 ?? My only concern is its playability, and also errr what to do with my current racket ???

Vision Hollow and the nano fusion series are also tempting ...

[clearng]

I just try out the Apacs nano800

armo frame

very powerful .........with 28lbs bg 80

very nice , cheap a powerful

value for money

[ignatio103]

is this apacs800 n 900 head heavy? as me stil looking for apacs head hevy raket...

[ignatio103]

is this apacs800 n 900 head heavy? as me stil looking for apacs head hevy raket...

[phandrew]

does anyone know how the grip size works? Is G2 larger than G3?

[clearng]

is this apacs800 n 900 head heavy? as me stil looking for apacs head hevy raket...

Nano 800 is a bit head heavy slightly heavier than Nano 900

[clearng]

does anyone know how the grip size works? Is G2 larger than G3?

G2 is bigger than G3 for sure G4 is smaller G5 is more small