Thread: LIN DAN String
01-11-2007, 12:18 AM #35
Don't the Pro players like LD and TH get sponsored by Yonex? If the sponsor only gives them BG65 strings for FREE, I think it's silly for LD to buy other strings to use.
01-11-2007, 07:30 AM #36
Players of that level do not need to pay for anything dude...if yonex makes underwear i think they will get it as well...
andrew bogut walked in to the city nike store in melbourne....the amount of bags he walked out with... incredible....
Originally Posted by BadFever
01-11-2007, 08:21 AM #37
why LD uses bg65-
1) with LD's power + crazy tension, he'll prolly burst thin strings
2) he simply finds it good for him
TH's tension is probably lower than LD's so he can use the thinner bg66?
01-11-2007, 09:52 AM #38Originally Posted by DivingBirdie
it's just personal, no conclusion to be drawn...(except that TH obviously can't be bothered by a snapped string)
01-11-2007, 08:31 PM #39Originally Posted by jerby
LD.... i dont know ....
01-13-2007, 09:36 PM #40Originally Posted by Glacyus
01-13-2007, 10:40 PM #41
Sorry to say it, but the truth is the exact opposite of what you stated. Since he is powerful enough to generate fast swing speed with a head-heavy racket, he gets considerably more power with that setup than with an even-balanced racket. Look it up in this forum too: head-heaviness=power.
01-13-2007, 11:41 PM #42
heh good thing i still remember where i read that.
take a look:
post stating what i stated:
01-14-2007, 01:03 AM #43
I'm confused !!!! ahh lead?? 15g WHATTT?!!
01-14-2007, 01:09 AM #44Originally Posted by azn_123
01-14-2007, 05:42 AM #45
Thin strings bite into the shuttle deeper, giving more power and more control than thick strings. TH will never use thick strings-he needs thin strings for his fabulous net play, spinning the shuttle that makes it unplayable. If TH were to use thick strings his net play will be even worse than LD's. Without his net play TH will be very ordinary.
LD has switched over to TH's type of racquet (AT700). Perhaps he should also switch over to the type of string TH uses.
01-14-2007, 05:54 AM #46Originally Posted by taneepak
TH will be ordinary without his bg66? did I read that correctly? you're really letting your imigination run free with you...
there's no universal standard for equipment choice..TH chooses this, LD the other..what's the deal?
01-14-2007, 06:28 AM #47Originally Posted by jerby
01-14-2007, 11:01 AM #48Originally Posted by sifuyono
All that is done in badminton is to decrease the effort spent. So, if there is a string that will result in more power with less effort, the palyers should prefer it, independently of his strenght.
01-15-2007, 12:45 PM #49
we can argue all we want and still, probably nobody would have all the right answers here
if the issue is WHO has the correct analysis or data, then we go directly to LD and TH for proof. else, we are all on the same boat. cheers.
01-15-2007, 08:16 PM #50Originally Posted by jam@eadg
01-15-2007, 08:26 PM #51Originally Posted by gavias
Preference of string based on his playing style, string with most power not always match with every player style, there's much more important than power, it's called technique. Even u have a thunder smash, there is a opportunity that the smash will be returned. TH much rely on his net playing, so he choose bg-66. Basically playing badminton isn't just about power, smash, repulsion, string, etc.... u need to train so hard about technique and playing strategy that suit ur playing style and stamina, then u may choose the equipment that suit ur performance
By neoanderson777 in forum Badminton StringReplies: 703: 12-13-2013, 12:19 PM
By yaltd41 in forum Badminton StringReplies: 0: 02-07-2012, 09:33 AM
By vipjun in forum Badminton StringReplies: 30: 10-13-2010, 03:02 AM
By kristian in forum Badminton StringReplies: 14: 07-18-2008, 03:58 AM
By bz123 in forum Badminton Rackets / EquipmentReplies: 6: 12-07-2007, 05:28 PM