Hi all, I have a Woven 13 and I think it's a great racket but the only point of it I don't like is the manuaverablilty of it. I was wondering how is the Woven 16 compared to the 13 in this.
It's all relative. The 13 is stiffer, heavier in swing weight and more powerful than the 16. The 16 has a noticeably lighter swing weight and is more forgiving, better for defense. Again, it's all relative. A person who can maximize the 13 will like it better than the 16. I found the Woven 16 so-so. Love the 13.
How does it compare with ns9k-x? apperantly those are almost same spec. weight, BP, length, stiffness, etc.
I agree with dink about the comparis W16 vs. W13. Thr NS9K feel very differnt, tahn W13.. I think W13 feels more solid and stable.. 9K-X hovever is a bit snappier/agile and feels stiffer imop. /T
woven 16 vs ns9k Thank twobeer. Since DinkAlot mentioned woven 16 is more agile and light and maneuverability is better. How's that compare with ns9k? I don't have any body around me who has woven 16. I heard it's quite durable If the characteristics is similar to ns9k I would think about getting one of it.
The W16 is less stiff than both NS9K-X and W13. W16 - medium-flex, strings 40lbs no prob :-D.. 100% made of Woven-material, expensive. NS9K-X - more fragile, ultra-stiff, string high-tension at own risk, expensive. W13 - very-stiff, higher quality Carbon than NS9K-X and W16. For me I would buy NS9K-X if I mainly played doubles, and I would buy W-13 if I mainly played singles.. found this when i googled btw: http://www.badmintontimes.com/pds/article/25/racket_2007040602.gif Cheers, Twobeer