User Tag List

Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Winnipeg, Canada
    Posts
    652
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default 21 points, best of five games?

    So for those of us that remember the five games to 7 points, it was just a complete fiasco. Completely ruined badminton, in my mind, I'm glad they got that straightened out.

    But I've realized after the tournament this weekend, that myself and most other players do not get tired in any substantial way until during the third game. Today in finals I played a girl I've come up against perhaps ten times in the past few years in finals, and under the old system we'd have incredible battles of willpower and fitness that lasted an extremely long time. The two times we've faced off with the 21 point system, it's been luck that determined the outcome of the match... a few net rolls here, a bird dropping on the outer edge of the back line there, a lucky shank every once in awhile. That is really all the difference between us, when before it used to be who could outlast and play consistently well over time.

    Thus, I think with 21 rally-point, it should be best of five. After all, look at other major sports, racquets and otherwise. Tennis matches go on for hours. Squash is best of five games to 9, but it's not rally point. Basketball, hockey, soccer... all timed games, the time being of very long duration.

    In my experience so far, a match to 21 passes by in no time at all. I have nothing against rally point to 21... I like it, but I think that three games is too short. It really removes a lot of cardio from the game, and thus a lot of dynamic.

    Tell me how you weigh in on this.

  2. #2
    Regular Member phaarix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Nelson, Aotearoa (NZ)
    Posts
    2,274
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think I'd die if I had to play a close 5 game match . Personally I like the current system (I was originally against it though). It doesn't seem to drag on as it sometimes used to. Of course I'm rather unfit so I'm a bit biased , but yeah I could never last out a 5 game match and if I could, by the end of it my shots would be so useless and weak that I think the outcome would be (in my case) more a question of fitness and stamina than skill.

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    88
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yes, I did mention the idea of BO5 in the other old vs new scoring system thread. Based on what I've seen so far, a 5 game match with all close scores (30-29) might last maybe 2 1/2 hours or 3 hours. But that rarely happens...

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    New York, US
    Posts
    10,283
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jcr2001
    Yes, I did mention the idea of BO5 in the other old vs new scoring system thread. Based on what I've seen so far, a 5 game match with all close scores (30-29) might last maybe 2 1/2 hours or 3 hours. But that rarely happens...
    If goes to 5 sets, I would say, go either 15 rally instead of 21 (deuce max to 20), or remain 21 rally, but reduce the max of deuce to 25 instead of 30.

    Or, remain with 3 sets, but give it 25 instead of 21?
    Last edited by LazyBuddy; 02-19-2007 at 12:16 AM.

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Winnipeg, Canada
    Posts
    652
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LazyBuddy
    If goes to 5 sets, I would say, go either 15 rally instead of 21 (deuce max to 20), or remain 21 rally, but reduce the max of deuce to 25 instead of 30.

    Or, remain with 3 sets, but give it 25 instead of 21?
    All great, viable alternatives, I like those. I just feel that the current system really eliminates the cardio aspect.

    Badminton is one of the toughest games out there... you need to be operating at 100% with regards to speed, consistency, accuracy, strength, mental toughness, strategy, and stamina. And of course it's so hard because you don't have teammates who can cover your flaws and work off your strengths. The current system kind of takes out stamina, which I'm sure many people love, but I'm a stamina player, so I feel cheated.

    Although, I did vote for the NSS in that poll because I feel that it promotes greater consistency and accuracy, and mental toughness FOR SURE.

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    New York, US
    Posts
    10,283
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by westwood_13
    but I'm a stamina player, so I feel cheated.
    With the reduced the duration of the game, there are other things I see might effect the outcome.

    I participated in several local tournaments, and I found the NSS greatly favorite the "home" players. Now, the court conditions (light, lines, floor, wind, etc) all playing bigger roles, as the "visitors" won't get enough time to get used to the new environment. Several mistakes here and there, you are down a set already. Therefore, the great "come back" might be even harder to apply.

    Never to metion, many players tend to play too conservatively, therefore, many "show" moves are harder and harder to be spotted.

  7. #7
    Regular Member phaarix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Nelson, Aotearoa (NZ)
    Posts
    2,274
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LazyBuddy
    I participated in several local tournaments, and I found the NSS greatly favorite the "home" players. Now, the court conditions (light, lines, floor, wind, etc) all playing bigger roles, as the "visitors" won't get enough time to get used to the new environment. Several mistakes here and there, you are down a set already. Therefore, the great "come back" might be even harder to apply.
    That's a good point. I think it could be a little longer as I do feel a 2 game match often feels a little too quick. I think 5 to 21 may be a bit much though. Especially for me... Although I have played 2 3 game matches in a row (6 games), I was completely worn out after that, and neither of us could really keep up in the last couple of games.

  8. #8
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    California
    Posts
    59
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Could anyone explain to me the new scoring system or give me a link to a thread explaining it? I know of the 15 point one, but havent heard of this 21 point one.

  9. #9
    Regular Member DinkAlot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    dcbadminton.net
    Posts
    12,280
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Not for me, skip.

  10. #10
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Winnipeg, Canada
    Posts
    652
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adone
    Could anyone explain to me the new scoring system or give me a link to a thread explaining it? I know of the 15 point one, but havent heard of this 21 point one.
    This post should be helpful:

    http://www.badmintoncentral.com/foru...ight=21+points

  11. #11
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    California
    Posts
    59
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by westwood_13
    ah thx for the link. So the point scoring is similiar to volleyball. I wonder if our highschool league will be playing with this new system or still use the old system. hm...

Similar Threads

  1. Do u prefer 15 points rule or 21 points rule?
    By Smichz in forum Rules / Tournament Regulation / Officiating
    Replies: 56
    : 03-07-2012, 01:06 AM
  2. Badminton Win Probability - From Points to Games
    By hhwoot in forum General Forum
    Replies: 5
    : 09-12-2010, 06:22 PM
  3. Pros/Cons of 15 Points and 21 points
    By FemaleJock in forum General Forum
    Replies: 2
    : 10-05-2009, 07:14 PM
  4. 21 points
    By coolman in forum General Forum
    Replies: 7
    : 06-18-2006, 09:36 AM
  5. How to win when your down by a lot of points?
    By oab729 in forum Techniques / Training
    Replies: 17
    : 04-22-2005, 09:28 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •