User Tag List

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 17 of 35
  1. #1
    New Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    England
    Posts
    2
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default How does 'head heavy' or 'head light' effect a racquet's suitability for a player?

    What sort of player would choose a head heavy, or a head light? I've tried head light and can't stand them but just wondered whats the normal consensus on playing styles compared to the balance of the racket?
    Considering demo-ing the AT900T as it seems to be a good head heavy racquet.

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    San Francisco/Davis California
    Posts
    270
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    uh... heavy is for smashing, light is for defending.

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    3,989
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Sigh.. AT900 Technique is not head-heavy.

    /T

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In your mind
    Posts
    809
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    So is the AT 900 T more even balanced? It's supposed to be somewhat head heavy, according to badminton alley. It's only a point above the AT 700 and AT 900 P, as they are 8, and the Technique is 7.

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    TW
    Posts
    393
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Maybe he thinks only AT700 is head heavy. All other rackets are head light.

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    3,989
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by foo.tw
    Maybe he thinks only AT700 is head heavy. All other rackets are head light.
    Maybe he thinks only NS7000/3U is head light. All other rackets are head heavy.

  7. #7
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In your mind
    Posts
    809
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Nice dispute, but it doesn't really tell us much, lol.

  8. #8
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Australia, Brisbane
    Posts
    44
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bad_man_ton
    What sort of player would choose a head heavy, or a head light? I've tried head light and can't stand them but just wondered whats the normal consensus on playing styles compared to the balance of the racket?
    Considering demo-ing the AT900T as it seems to be a good head heavy racquet.
    Hi bad_man_ton,
    Personally, I don't think it really matter that much. Just go with whichever racquet you think you can get along with comfortably (at ease).

    Racquet just simply act as a tool in the sport. It is the player's technique that doing the wonders, as always. Cheer!!

    Best regards,
    Albert

  9. #9
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    856
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I like both head heavy and head light. So I have a heavy head-light Ti-10. Although the racket is 120g, it is lighter and faster than an ordinary NS8000 3U at 89g. It smashes, and it defends. Why settle for one or the other, when you can have both ?

  10. #10
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In your mind
    Posts
    809
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Um.., because not everyone can have both? Like me. I'm trying to decide between the AT 900s and the AT 700, as I am only able to purchase one with the amount of money I have. Like most people, I would like to get the most out of what I spend, so I'm constantly trying to get feedback on these rackets. But it doesn't seem like anyone's really paying attention, or have any knowledge pertaining to what I inquire.

  11. #11
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    3,989
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tsumaranai
    Nice dispute, but it doesn't really tell us much, lol.
    Well all I can say is that I am holding a AT9000T/3U in my hand right now, and it does not feel head-heavy. I guess there is alot of armchair critics around?? Foo.TW have you actually used an AT-900 T 4U or 3U ??

    /Twobeer

  12. #12
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    3,989
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CoolDoo6
    I like both head heavy and head light. So I have a heavy head-light Ti-10. Although the racket is 120g, it is lighter and faster than an ordinary NS8000 3U at 89g. It smashes, and it defends. Why settle for one or the other, when you can have both ?
    Yeah, right.. a 120g??? headlight Ti-10 faster than a 89g NS8000/3U in defense .. ROFL..

    OMG.. why havent the racket-makers figured that out.. just take a 150g training-racket and shave of some grams at the frame (they dont really need much carbon there anyway as 15lbs is a perfect tension ) to make it headlight.. Voaila the perfect racket ....

    I have to give it to you CoolDoo6, you always entertain

    /T

  13. #13
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Winnipeg, Canada
    Posts
    652
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The theory goes as follows:

    - a head light racqute will be more manouevrable, and this is better for 'touch' strokes and quick wrist movements for flicks and defensive shots

    - a head heavy racquet will have greater torque and thus generate more power for shots, especially with reference for clearing and smashing


    Although really, I think it's more marketing than anything else. Just try things out until you find something htat feels comfortable, that's the best you can do.

  14. #14
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    3,989
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tsumaranai
    Um.., because not everyone can have both? Like me. I'm trying to decide between the AT 900s and the AT 700, as I am only able to purchase one with the amount of money I have. Like most people, I would like to get the most out of what I spend, so I'm constantly trying to get feedback on these rackets. But it doesn't seem like anyone's really paying attention, or have any knowledge pertaining to what I inquire.
    I would place them in the order AT700 > AT900P > AT900T in terms of headheaviness. stiffness wise they are AT900P > AT900T > AT700..

    I dont have any bp measuremements in mm.. but this is my experience from playing extensively with them

    Cheers,
    Twobeer

  15. #15
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    In your mind
    Posts
    809
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Sorry for getting a little off topic, but how would you say these 3 rackets play, in comparison to each other, then?

  16. #16
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    6,302
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Others can't tell you how those racquets play. You really have to try them out yourself. What is good for twobeer may not be good for you.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tsumaranai
    Sorry for getting a little off topic, but how would you say these 3 rackets play, in comparison to each other, then?

  17. #17
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    North York, Canada
    Posts
    10
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    you can switch around with both and see which one you're better at. at least that's how i did it. I've switched around between NS9K, AT700, and NS8k for
    many monthes, now ive finally found my match --- NS9K

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Head light/head heavy physics?
    By SSSSNT in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 14
    : 03-10-2012, 02:56 PM
  2. Replies: 19
    : 07-26-2011, 11:15 PM
  3. Replies: 2
    : 07-08-2011, 07:05 PM
  4. Head light or head heavy rackets likely to cause tennis elbow?
    By TRENTEND in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 19
    : 09-23-2008, 10:49 AM
  5. Head-heavy or head light racquet?
    By loofatt in forum Racket Recommendation / Comparison
    Replies: 5
    : 01-13-2006, 11:11 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •