User Tag List

Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Vancouver, Canada
    Posts
    294
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Ashaway Mocropower thickness

    Ashaway MP and MP-XL are listed as 0.70mm and 0.73mm, but they are also said to be 10% thinner than standard. Does this mean they are actually 0.63mm and 0.66mm in thickness?

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    San Francisco/Davis California
    Posts
    270
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    standard is 1 mm? is that why 10% is .1 mm?

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Vancouver, Canada
    Posts
    294
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I don't think standard = 1mm, or else "10% thinner" would mean .90mm.

    The .70mm MP does look thinner than BG-65 which is also .70mm. It's looks as thin as the .68mm BG-80, but then .68mm is not "10% thinner" than .70mm.

Similar Threads

  1. Ashaway MicroPower at 0.66mm thickness?
    By tkteo in forum Badminton String
    Replies: 43
    : 02-18-2014, 06:10 AM
  2. The Thickness of Grips
    By Az1k1 in forum Grip
    Replies: 16
    : 12-27-2008, 10:12 PM
  3. differentiating thickness
    By manduki in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 4
    : 04-11-2005, 09:31 PM
  4. Thickness of Karakal PU
    By ITR111 in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 0
    : 08-18-2004, 02:52 AM
  5. String Thickness
    By Byro-Nenium in forum Badminton String
    Replies: 3
    : 06-20-2001, 09:47 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •