User Tag List

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast
Results 18 to 34 of 89
  1. #18
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    162
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by foo.tw View Post
    I would rather say: AT700 is much much softer than AT900s. AT700 is a guite soft racket after some days of use. Acceptable stiffness when it's new(still not as stiff as AT900), but soft out quickly after use.
    Yeah I totally agree with this. Kind of what I was trying to say when I say it's more accessible to more people, as the 900P is much stiffer and hence harder to use (better for advanced people with advanced technique).

    Having said that, at700 does require very good technique to be able to bring out its potential.

  2. #19
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    house.
    Posts
    57
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    which is more powerful? armortec 700 or armortec 900 technique??

  3. #20
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    162
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I would say the 700 is more powerful (dependent on the player of course). However, the 900P would be potentially the most powerful providing you can use it.

  4. #21
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    house.
    Posts
    57
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    but in all in all, which is a better racket?armortec 700 or armortec 900 technique? thanks!

  5. #22
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    162
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    It's a toughie, I like them both, but i judge mine on which racket is easiest to use and i'd say the 900 technique is easier to use out of the 2.

  6. #23
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    3,993
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by marckevin20 View Post
    but in all in all, which is a better racket?armortec 700 or armortec 900 technique? thanks!
    They are different, "better" is subjective..
    /T

  7. #24
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    house.
    Posts
    57
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Slicedbanana07 View Post
    It's a toughie, I like them both, but i judge mine on which racket is easiest to use and i'd say the 900 technique is easier to use out of the 2.

    ohh,, thanks! but i want the combination of POWER!!and control . so, is it armortec 700? or armortec 900 technique?

  8. #25
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    house.
    Posts
    57
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by twobeer View Post
    They are different, "better" is subjective..
    /T
    but which one is a good racket for combination of smash and control?

  9. #26
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Germania
    Posts
    696
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I usually play at700, but trust me - at900t is the racquet your looking for! it is awesome.

  10. #27
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    162
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    if you want more control, but still good power, it has to be the technique.

    On paper, the technique has the best of both worlds. While it isn't the most powerful, it is still powerful. Just go with a 3U version. The added weight will assist in generating more power, while defense should still be good enough.

  11. #28
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    house.
    Posts
    57
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by twobeer View Post
    They are different, "better" is subjective..
    /T

    ohh,,but which one has more power and control?

  12. #29
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    house.
    Posts
    57
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stork View Post
    I usually play at700, but trust me - at900t is the racquet your looking for! it is awesome.

    ahh.. hehe. thanks! but i love smash than control. so which racket?

  13. #30
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    house.
    Posts
    57
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Slicedbanana07 View Post
    if you want more control, but still good power, it has to be the technique.

    On paper, the technique has the best of both worlds. While it isn't the most powerful, it is still powerful. Just go with a 3U version. The added weight will assist in generating more power, while defense should still be good enough.

    ohh,, thanks! but love to smash than control? but i love them both! haha. so which one?

  14. #31
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Germania
    Posts
    696
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    everything said here. 900t is power and control.

  15. #32
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    3,993
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by marckevin20 View Post
    ohh,,but which one has more power and control?
    None of them.. YOU have the power, and YOU have the control !! The best of them is the one that transfer most of YOUR power, and control to the shuttle!!!

    /T

  16. #33
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Germania
    Posts
    696
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by twobeer View Post
    None of them.. YOU have the power, and YOU have the control !! The best of them is the one that transfer most of YOUR power, and control to the shuttle!!!

    /T
    very true, but a suitable racquet makes that transfer a little bit easier.

  17. #34
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    162
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    "very true, but a suitable racquet makes that transfer a little bit easier."

    Of course, and we are suggesting the 900T. If you have the money, go for a 900T then a at700. Why not have 2 rackets, 900T for doubles and 700 for singles. But if i were to choose one, it'll be the 900T, purely because of the balance. Don't be fooled to think that the 700 has a lot more power than the technique therefore the technique is a weak racket. It's not, the 900T can smash hard (if you are really strong - then you can smash harder). But for those who seek ultimate smashing pleasure, the at700 is probably the way to go, but with this racket you'll haver to sacrifice some control. Now with this, its similar to the technique, the control will still be there (referring to the racket), but with your skill, you can bring it up to par with the 900T.

    The racket is there as a tool. It gives you different levels of control and power etc. Your skill and strength as a player is what makes the reacket better. If you are a player of finesse and control, a racket like the 700, whose basic spec is that control is ok, would be soo much better (control that is) when used by you because of your skill alone.

    Example - look at pro's Lin Dan, Peter Gade whom both use and love the at700. On paper its all about power with slightly less control. But, they can control it justb as well as any other racket on the market, even rackets that are targeted more towards control.

    Look at Taufik, he has the hardest smash in singles. I'm sure he can hit just as fast with a 900 technique than an at700.

    Anyway, if you are an average/ intermediate player, which racket you get does not really matter because you want notice too much change in performance levels. If you are a good player, get the racket that is more suited to your style. Your skills alone should more than compensate for the "lack of" in the racket.

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Armortec 900 power or technique?
    By JoHn B in forum Racket Recommendation / Comparison
    Replies: 25
    : 04-27-2012, 08:14 AM
  2. FS: Armortec 900 Technique / Armortec 900 Power and Nanospeed 9900
    By miragitsu in forum Buy & Sell - Read the rules sticky before you post
    Replies: 15
    : 08-26-2011, 04:28 AM
  3. FS: Armortec 800 Defence and Armortec 900 Technique Brand new, (GTA)
    By Jason08Leafs in forum Buy & Sell - Read the rules sticky before you post
    Replies: 1
    : 08-29-2010, 01:47 PM
  4. Armortec 900 Technique or Power?
    By iceshoc in forum Racket Recommendation / Comparison
    Replies: 21
    : 06-16-2008, 06:39 PM
  5. Armortec 900 Power and Technique
    By ants in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 827
    : 05-30-2007, 07:10 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •