Results 1 to 8 of 8
Thread: AT900T and NS7000 (2007)
06-04-2007, 02:34 AM #1
AT900T and NS7000 (2007)
i'm planning on getting a racket soon, and i'm torn between these two rackets. i play both singles and doubles. i suppose i am a low level intermediate player. i like to play defensively. i prefer control and maneverability. i have decent smash. i suppose i'm a well-rounded player. just want to get your opinions on these rackets.
06-04-2007, 08:34 AM #2
I prefer AT900-T. Durability is normal while NS7000 has a very bad durability.
Power is better, Defence is a bit weaker but still excellent, control is as good.
06-04-2007, 08:48 AM #3
06-04-2007, 09:03 AM #4
NS7000 is much better in control and maneverability than AT900t IMHO. Also new (2007) NS7000 has better durability than older model. However, since you play both single and double, AT900t might be a better choice in that area. Since you are in SD, why not drop by SD badminton supply to demo these 2 racquets and let your feeling decide.
06-04-2007, 10:18 AM #5
06-04-2007, 10:38 AM #6
2) Please note that durability means you have better chance of surviving a clash, not paint chip. What you say is a proof that NS7000 can survive minor clash and it only cause paint chip, not a dead racquet.
06-04-2007, 01:52 PM #7
yeah... i've been to the sd badminton store to give each a swing. i haven't gotten to actually play with the at900t in game though. i think that might make the difference in my decision. i am leaning towards the 4u at900t (cuz i'm weak >_>) xP.
06-04-2007, 02:11 PM #8
Get the popular 3U, avoid the 4U.
Last edited by Matt; 06-04-2007 at 02:14 PM.
By cappius in forum Buy & SellReplies: 1: 08-07-2009, 11:43 PM
By GTAveteran in forum Buy & SellReplies: 3: 05-13-2009, 11:21 AM
By Vodude in forum Racket Recommendation / ComparisonReplies: 4: 03-06-2009, 10:39 PM
By otterfun in forum Racket Recommendation / ComparisonReplies: 4: 02-29-2008, 08:22 PM
By RobbieV in forum Badminton Rackets / EquipmentReplies: 20: 02-16-2007, 11:45 AM