User Tag List

Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    La Jolla/Hercules
    Posts
    11
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default AT900T and NS7000 (2007)

    hi,

    i'm planning on getting a racket soon, and i'm torn between these two rackets. i play both singles and doubles. i suppose i am a low level intermediate player. i like to play defensively. i prefer control and maneverability. i have decent smash. i suppose i'm a well-rounded player. just want to get your opinions on these rackets.

    thanks.

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    TW
    Posts
    393
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I prefer AT900-T. Durability is normal while NS7000 has a very bad durability.
    Power is better, Defence is a bit weaker but still excellent, control is as good.

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    181
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by foo.tw View Post
    I prefer AT900-T. Durability is normal while NS7000 has a very bad durability.
    Power is better, Defence is a bit weaker but still excellent, control is as good.
    foo, in one of the other posts, you mentioned that at900p is prefered over at700. It seems that you also have at900t. How does the at900t compares with the at900p. Which do you prefer more?

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,638
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    NS7000 is much better in control and maneverability than AT900t IMHO. Also new (2007) NS7000 has better durability than older model. However, since you play both single and double, AT900t might be a better choice in that area. Since you are in SD, why not drop by SD badminton supply to demo these 2 racquets and let your feeling decide.

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Ottawa, Ontario
    Posts
    405
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by silentheart View Post
    NS7000 is much better in control and maneverability than AT900t IMHO. Also new (2007) NS7000 has better durability than older model. However, since you play both single and double, AT900t might be a better choice in that area. Since you are in SD, why not drop by SD badminton supply to demo these 2 racquets and let your feeling decide.
    WOuldnt a 4u At900T compensate for the control and maneuverability compared to the NS7000? And is the ns7000 that much mroe durable now..o.O because i played with my friends and it chipped quite easily..=/

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    4,638
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BennyC View Post
    WOuldnt a 4u At900T compensate for the control and maneuverability compared to the NS7000? And is the ns7000 that much mroe durable now..o.O because i played with my friends and it chipped quite easily..=/
    1) 4U AT900t is still much more head heavier than 3U NS7000. That is what AT is for. More power. Give it a swing and you will see the difference.
    2) Please note that durability means you have better chance of surviving a clash, not paint chip. What you say is a proof that NS7000 can survive minor clash and it only cause paint chip, not a dead racquet.

  7. #7
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    La Jolla/Hercules
    Posts
    11
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    yeah... i've been to the sd badminton store to give each a swing. i haven't gotten to actually play with the at900t in game though. i think that might make the difference in my decision. i am leaning towards the 4u at900t (cuz i'm weak >_>) xP.

  8. #8
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Richmond, BC
    Posts
    5,209
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Get the popular 3U, avoid the 4U.
    Last edited by Matt; 06-04-2007 at 02:14 PM.

Similar Threads

  1. Ft/s: Ns7000
    By cappius in forum Buy & Sell - Read the rules sticky before you post
    Replies: 1
    : 08-07-2009, 11:43 PM
  2. WTT:AT900T (CD coded) for NS7000
    By GTAveteran in forum Buy & Sell - Read the rules sticky before you post
    Replies: 3
    : 05-13-2009, 11:21 AM
  3. moving from at900t 4u4g to at900t 3u5g
    By Vodude in forum Racket Recommendation / Comparison
    Replies: 4
    : 03-06-2009, 10:39 PM
  4. 2nd racket : AT900T, AT500, or NS7000
    By otterfun in forum Racket Recommendation / Comparison
    Replies: 4
    : 02-29-2008, 08:22 PM
  5. Buy a NS7000 (used 2007 model)???
    By RobbieV in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 20
    : 02-16-2007, 11:45 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •