User Tag List
Results 1 to 14 of 14
-
06-27-2007, 08:14 AM #1
Starting knot vs Tie-off knot on the top cross
I have noticed that there is a significant difference between using a starting knot on the first cross string vs a tie-off knot. Using a starting knot gives you more zip and also provides a much higher level of crispness to your shots. Using a tie-off knot, even if tensioned at 10% to 15% higher tension for the last cross string, makes it feel more soggy and renders flicks lacking in speed and bite.
I would like to know your experience.
-
06-27-2007, 08:19 AM #2
I used to use a tie-off knot at the top, but eventually changed to a starting knot. I have not noticed the sort of difference you are talking about.
Maybe you have some problems with your technique
(or my observation skills leave something to be desired
)
-
06-27-2007, 08:42 AM #3
I use starting knot to start cross because if it is easier and less slipage. Is this what you are talking about?
PS. Eepk, how was your silk road trip?
-
06-27-2007, 10:42 AM #4
I have a few questions toward your observation:
1. How many times your shots landed on the top 1-2 crosses?
If most of the strokes landed on the sweet spot, then it's far away from the top cross, which has very min. impact.
2. I understand the possible tension lost for the tie-off of the top cross. However, leave the racket for like 1-2 days, the string will pretty much pull all the tension to be even, or near to be even. I really wonder how much difference in feeling it will make.
Overall, I think the tension and clamp of each cross during the cross stringing, is much more important than the tie-off knots, as long as you do it properly, and don't result into huge tension loss.
-
06-27-2007, 11:55 AM #5
-there are ways to alleviate the tension loss problem at top tie-off
-the player is mis-hitting shuttles near the top of racket which string breakage is a bigger issue than not feeling as crisp
-
06-27-2007, 12:07 PM #6
-
06-27-2007, 03:20 PM #7
-
06-28-2007, 09:22 PM #8
Maybe it only applies to high tension. My standard tension is 28lbs/30.8lbs, and with this tensions I do notice the difference between the tie-off vs the starting knot. Some of my customers who play with high tensions also brought this to my attention-I didn't tell them I used a tie-off on their most recent racquets instead of a starting knot. They complain about a lack of crispness.
-
06-28-2007, 09:30 PM #9
Ironic, I was just going to post about this. On further thought and inspection, I believe you have the solution. At lower tensions, 25lbs. or lower, I don't really feel a difference. But at 28lbs. and higher, I do feel there's a crisper feel with the starting knot at the top.
I tried to replicate the starting knot on top feel with the tie-off on top. I went from 29lbs. to 32lbs. on the last 5 crosses, 34lbs. on the tie-off and it didn't have the same effect. In addition, I slightly warped the racket.
Last edited by DinkAlot; 06-28-2007 at 09:34 PM.
-
06-28-2007, 11:27 PM #10
-
07-11-2007, 10:43 PM #11
34 lbs....
what racquet is it?
-
07-12-2007, 03:23 AM #12
34lbs. is nothing, imagine PeteLSD's tie-off at 38lbs.

If you're a careful a stringer, most rackets can take 34lbs. I've strung a 5U flexy racket with a very soft frame at 32lbs. and it held up. I've strung plenty of old Cabs with a recommended string tension of no more than 18lbs. at 30lbs. They hold up great.
You just have to know how and be careful.
-
07-12-2007, 03:35 AM #13
-
07-12-2007, 03:39 AM #14
Similar Threads
-
Badminton string knot - can someone help me with this knot tech?
By wuldup in forum Badminton Stringing Techniques & ToolsReplies: 4: 11-13-2011, 09:15 AM -
3 knot stringing
By drew tze en in forum Badminton Stringing Techniques & ToolsReplies: 2: 04-30-2011, 02:58 PM -
4 knot, 2 knot or is there 3 knot?
By alexkho in forum Badminton StringReplies: 64: 10-10-2009, 08:13 AM -
Is this knot okay?
By yuenie in forum Badminton Stringing Techniques & ToolsReplies: 3: 08-16-2009, 04:37 PM -
2 Knot Stencils
By ^Tayo^ in forum Badminton Stringing Techniques & ToolsReplies: 2: 08-16-2006, 12:49 PM




Reply With Quote


Bookmarks