User Tag List

Page 19 of 49 FirstFirst ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 ... LastLast
Results 307 to 323 of 824
  1. #307
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    .
    Posts
    54
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Happy New Year!

    Hope the apacs review can be put up smoothly!

  2. #308
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
    Posts
    423
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    hi dinkalot .. i know u are bz with moving and all
    but could u just gimme a quick one on APACS AMP90/95 vs YY Ti-10 ??
    i am currently using AMP90 .. thinking of getting a AMP95 coz i cannot generate enuff power and oso create sharper "dipping' shots .. with AMP90 alot of my shots go flat and straight .. AMP90 oso gave me the feeling of "not solid" enuff when in contact with shuttle
    previously i was using YY cab21sp .. changed to APACS AMP90 coz wanted a bigger sweet spot due to ISO .. didnt choose YY at 1st coz of price and wanted to try some other brands .. all this while i was using YY rackets (have the old cab8 & cab880tour currently as well) .. play doubles most of the time with hard hitting and fast exchanges
    thanks

  3. #309
    Regular Member DinkAlot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    dcbadminton.net
    Posts
    12,200
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by allanQ View Post
    play doubles most of the time with hard hitting and fast exchanges
    thanks
    Go with the APACS Nano Power 9900 not the AMP90/95.

  4. #310
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
    Posts
    423
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DinkAlot View Post
    Go with the APACS Nano Power 9900 not the AMP90/95.
    hmmm .. will take that into consideration
    thanks

  5. #311
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    30
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    sorry if this question has been answered before, but i don't know much about APACS rackets in terms of their similarities to the Yonex rackets, so i was wondering what would be the APACS racket equivalent (or closest to) to the Armortec 900-Power?

  6. #312
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,272
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Apacs clone Nano 900 Power (red) is the clone of Yonex Armortec 900P.

  7. #313
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    101
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Athelete1234 View Post
    Apacs clone Nano 900 Power (red) is the clone of Yonex Armortec 900P.
    Yes and the Nano 900 Power (white) is the clone of the 900T. I also heard that the Nanotec900 is out or something? Can someone please clarify because i can't find it on google O__O

  8. #314
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    124
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maxphi5 View Post
    Yes and the Nano 900 Power (white) is the clone of the 900T. I also heard that the Nanotec900 is out or something? Can someone please clarify because i can't find it on google O__O
    The Furious 900 is a clone of the AT900T as well

  9. #315
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    montreal, quebec CANADA
    Posts
    86
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default cab30 to AMP95?

    Well I just took the plunge and ordered an AMP95 from the APACS Canada site...

    After trying several rackets I've settled on the cab30 as my go to racket.

    Do these 2 rackets compare?

    I was going to get a woven 7 since someone just got me one in a G3 grip size but I got used to the G4 size using the cab30 so i went ahead and ordered the AMP95.

    Took me about a dozen rackets to find the "one" and now here we go again!

    Bolts

  10. #316
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    101
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gumpy_999 View Post
    The Furious 900 is a clone of the AT900T as well
    But is there such thing as the nanotec900?

  11. #317
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    224
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    DinkAlot have you tried out the furious model ...... i am interested in the pro 1000/2000.
    i just wonder how does it feel .... currently i am using AMP 95 VH1800 ....

  12. #318
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    530
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maxphi5 View Post
    But is there such thing as the nanotec900?
    Nanotec 900 actually is the Nano 900 Power.....Nanotec is singapore market and Nano 900 Power is mostly all the other country market's name =)....both are the same thing

  13. #319
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    3,653
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Dinkalot do you now prefer the nano power 9900 over AMP95? What is your comparison between these 2 rackets?

  14. #320
    Regular Member DinkAlot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    dcbadminton.net
    Posts
    12,200
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phandrew View Post
    Dinkalot do you now prefer the nano power 9900 over AMP95? What is your comparison between these 2 rackets?
    Depends. The NP9900 hits harder but the AMP95 transitions better. Against faster, advanced players who can control the game, I'd opt for the Lethal 50 or Tantrum 200 or AMP95. If my partner can control the game, then I'll go for the 9900.

    This weekend was a prime example, was playing a match against Coach Don and he was just too fast, he controlled the game, kept the shuttle low and I could not transition fast enough, I was hitting everything behind me with the 9900. After 10 or so points, I switched to the L50 and though (of course) I still couldn't control the game, I could catch up to the shuttle and hit everything in front and eventually attacked Coach Don's student and managed to win. It was a huge difference.

    So, to sum up, if you want an all out smash racket, gram for gram on par with the Woven 11, the NP9900 is your ticket at the expense of mobility (like any other racket).

    If you want more balance, try the T200, then L50 (a bit heavier in swing weight than the T200), then AMP95 (a bit heavier than the L50).

    The T200 and L50 are very strong frames, I just strung an L50 at 32lbs. ECP. It's holding up fine.

  15. #321
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    3,653
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I just being told by the distributor for apacs in australia that the NP9900 had a breakage rate of 80%. I don't know if this applies to other countries.

  16. #322
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    3,989
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phandrew View Post
    I just being told by the distributor for apacs in australia that the NP9900 had a breakage rate of 80%. I don't know if this applies to other countries.
    I thought every racket had a breakage rate of 100% (if used for infinite time)

    /Twobeer

  17. #323
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    3,653
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by twobeer View Post
    I thought every racket had a breakage rate of 100% (if used for infinite time)

    /Twobeer
    The problem was the shaft where it would snap randomly

Page 19 of 49 FirstFirst ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. DinkALot's Badminton String Review
    By DinkAlot in forum Badminton String
    Replies: 449
    : 07-11-2014, 07:23 PM
  2. VIDEO By Request: DinkALot Strings a Racket
    By DinkAlot in forum Badminton Stringing Techniques & Tools
    Replies: 310
    : 03-11-2014, 08:10 AM
  3. DinkALot's Shoe & Insole Review
    By DinkAlot in forum Clothing & Footwear
    Replies: 272
    : 01-10-2014, 04:53 PM
  4. review request for Dinkalot
    By gy79bc in forum Racket Recommendation / Comparison
    Replies: 14
    : 06-04-2008, 07:51 PM
  5. Replies: 4
    : 08-31-2006, 12:07 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •