Thread: DinkALot's Racket Review
09-11-2007, 05:57 PM #103
Last edited by cooler; 09-11-2007 at 06:11 PM.
09-11-2007, 06:31 PM #104
Let me lend a hand here. I have owned enough Ti-10s new and old version to know the ins and outs. Overall, the old version is stiffer.
09-11-2007, 07:27 PM #105
Unless I got a defective, new Ti10 to test, your "scientific" instruments are flawed and/or biased.
Science cannot be unbiased unless you prove your methodology. You haven't, you just claimed it's scientific. I'm not doubting your methods nor approving them, I would just like to know what they are. So please post your methodology, thanks.
Also, please give us your detalied findings between the two rackets, I'd like to see them; or link me to where you posted it, thanks.
For me, revisions are necessary because times change and what we know changes. Remember Columbus? Newton? When I test things, it's at that time. Later, maybe a new benchmark comes out or I have a defective racket or some other variable. If that's the case I will certainly revise or update my findings.
Finally, please do not put words in my mouth nor make me out for something I am not. I never claimed to be 100% correct or holy or whatever you are saying. Please just stop with that.
You claim you made a scientific finding, I'm asking you to please prove it because again, the new Ti10 I tried (informally) was not as stiff as as the old one.
I look forward to your scientific analysis as I like learning new things, thank you.
Last edited by DinkAlot; 09-11-2007 at 07:29 PM.
09-11-2007, 07:28 PM #106
09-11-2007, 08:08 PM #107
09-11-2007, 08:10 PM #108
09-12-2007, 06:16 AM #109
Well I took dinkalots review on the racquets and upgraded to a d600 from the at500 and at 300 and I loved it ..End of the day u look at the review as just a good refrence source and choose a racquets among the good oens there dpeending on ur playing style and prefrences.
The review is not the ultimate and 100% right and as a matte rof fact no review is as the reviewers prefrences is bound to show up a little bit but it deifntelty is very veyr use ..way to go dink.
09-12-2007, 02:55 PM #110
U have the rights and opportunity to prove me wrong, scientifically. A subjective feel that contradicts science doesnt prove the science is wrong.
From above posts, u have already acknowledged that your 'review is not definite/ultimate'. U can't claim holy correctness when yourself declared not definitely certain. I'm not trying to start a controversial debate. I'm only quoting here Go figure? My figures were done already
09-12-2007, 06:34 PM #111
Yes, science can be contradicted or corrected or improved but preferrably by another sciencifically based theory or methodology.
Stiffness is a human term which linguistically serve us well under normal circumstances like comparing noodles to a bamboo stick. However, when comparing stiffness at a narrower range, it can fail as we all sometime disagree to yonex's assigned stiffness to each racket models, as well as how members here disagree about stiffness of AT700 or other rackets.
My method is simple and based on well known convention, the SI system.
I bend the racket with known weight (g, kg,) and measured with standardized measuring devices that record deflection in mm, cm etc. There shouldnt be any unknown process introduced in this type of experiement. Yes, i assumed gravitation constant remaining constant between the time i tested the new and old ti10
Last edited by cooler; 09-12-2007 at 06:45 PM.
09-12-2007, 06:36 PM #112
09-16-2007, 05:30 PM #113
how come i can't see the review anymore? used to be able to...
09-18-2007, 02:46 AM #114
hi DinkAlot would be reviewing any tactic rackets?
09-18-2007, 03:28 AM #115
09-18-2007, 09:58 AM #116
Sir Dink, will there be an update with other rackets ?
I'm so impatient to read a review on models such as Yonex Ti-10 or Victor Super Wave 32.
09-18-2007, 10:01 AM #117
10-07-2007, 04:54 PM #118
I plan to buy a woven 7, and from reading the review it's certainly assuring. Also, what tension can the racket hold up to? I normally go 24x26 with bg-80. Do you think this would generate impressive power?
10-07-2007, 05:18 PM #119
Power is generated by the wielder.
Do a search, Woven rackets are generally guaranteed up to 30lbs.
By DinkAlot in forum Badminton StringReplies: 448: 04-17-2014, 12:28 AM
By DinkAlot in forum Badminton Stringing Techniques & ToolsReplies: 310: 03-11-2014, 08:10 AM
By DinkAlot in forum Clothing & FootwearReplies: 272: 01-10-2014, 04:53 PM
By gy79bc in forum Racket Recommendation / ComparisonReplies: 14: 06-04-2008, 07:51 PM
By yoyomonkey in forum General ForumReplies: 4: 08-31-2006, 12:07 PM