DinkALot's Racket Review

**cryptail** · 12-15-2007, 01:39 PM

hello, i was about to buy a new racket... a AT 700, but does it really break that fast? I do play with some beginners sometimes, so if it breaks that fast (poor+...) I think I need to buy another racket...

so is the differnce in durability that big? between AT700 and AT 900/SOTX/...

**Athelete1234** · 12-15-2007, 02:16 PM

Dinkalot's AT700 was in 4U, which is more fragile than the 3U model.

**cryptail** · 12-15-2007, 02:19 PM

so it would be smarter to buy U3..? hmm, i'll see in the store

**cryptail** · 12-16-2007, 04:02 PM

and isn't it a bit of a paradox..? i know the table subjective but AT900P isn't bold, but as many say it's one of the best rackets atm...?

**jerby** · 12-16-2007, 04:06 PM

Originally Posted by cryptail

and isn't it a bit of a paradox..? i know the table subjective but AT900P isn't bold, but as many say it's one of the best rackets atm...?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion

**UncleFester** · 12-16-2007, 04:49 PM

Originally Posted by jerby

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion

Hahaha!

Best comment of the week

**DinkAlot** · 12-16-2007, 05:05 PM

Originally Posted by cryptail

and isn't it a bit of a paradox..? i know the table subjective but AT900P isn't bold, but as many say it's one of the best rackets atm...?

A fellow BCer brought this to my attention, it's not:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion

But rather:

http://www.answers.com/omit

I'll correct it, one of these days. Panda is still hibernating.

***Oldhand*** · 12-16-2007, 08:02 PM

Originally Posted by DinkAlot

A fellow BCer brought this to my attention, it's not:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion

But rather:

http://www.answers.com/omit

I'll correct it, one of these days. Panda is still hibernating.

Well, the more apt link is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lazy

It's nice to see that you are around

Is that the new review you're working on?

**cryptail** · 12-17-2007, 05:17 AM

oké

dan ist nice to see your on the site again... i saw your work(tables) and i really appreciate it

altough I think it's a lot of money to spend on badminton stuff

**jerby** · 12-17-2007, 09:54 AM

Originally Posted by DinkAlot

A fellow BCer brought this to my attention, it's not:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion

But rather:

http://www.answers.com/omit

I'll correct it, one of these days. Panda is still hibernating.

Darn it,

so much for my witty reply

How's Chao pai working out?

**bolts** · 01-05-2008, 02:18 AM

Is there a reason the superlight series by Sotx was not included in the review?

bolts

**cryptail** · 01-05-2008, 06:38 AM

Originally Posted by bolts

Is there a reason the superlight series by Sotx was not included in the review?

bolts

I think it's impossible to make a table of all the rackets in the world... For instance he didn't rate the isometrics either...

Cryptail

**jerby** · 01-05-2008, 06:41 AM

Well, I think I read Dan did test it out (must be 2 years ago by now)
But then there are a few other rackets I recall he did test..But some are so long ago he might've forgotten about them.
I mean, be fair, could you honestly say you an give a truthfull review of a racket you tried 2 years ago?

Just like the at500, I think he tried it, but it's not on the review...I wouldn't dare to hold it against him

**clearng** · 01-05-2008, 07:05 AM

every racket DinkALot's review and put comment on the chart
...........
true or not
for pro any cheap and bad racket also can perform
ask lin dan use a cabonex 8100 blacken 2
also can win me
lol

wat u write on the chart ,,,,, the thing is u really try out all the model ?
wat is ur playing style ? play maker ? hard hitters? defender? attacker? controller?

nahhhhhhhhhhhhh

**bolts** · 01-09-2008, 04:03 AM

Ok let's try approaching this another way.... I just read your post in another thread Dink and you have indeed tried the LG series ... your efforts are always WELL appreciated ...even though I don't say it in each and every post... so, we get everyone chiming in to your defense!

Now...how would the LG300(it's the one I preferred too when I tried it and the 600 awhile back) compare to the Kason carvel?

They are in the same weight class and the price is also similar... from my understanding they seem to be for a similar market right?

I justs picked up a few rackets and now one of each of these are included in the arsenal so I'd really appreciate a professional opinion

TIA

John

**ae86trueno** · 02-09-2008, 05:42 AM

Question, about the review. The last 4 racket (Yonex Ti10) is that typo? listed SP and US twice each but with all of them old, is that mean old new old new?

**bolts** · 02-09-2008, 03:21 PM

The difference between the rackets is the weight ...2U and 3U

Originally Posted by ae86trueno

Question, about the review. The last 4 racket (Yonex Ti10) is that typo? listed SP and US twice each but with all of them old, is that mean old new old new?