User Tag List

Page 12 of 17 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 LastLast
Results 188 to 204 of 287
  1. #188
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    515
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    is this racket more suitable for singles players?

    are there many doubles players who use this racket?

  2. #189
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    england
    Posts
    75
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    This racket is suitable (in my opinion) for both singles and doubles as it quite manouverable but still has good power. It has been used by both international singles (taufik, Hafiz Hashim) and doubles player (cant remember the names but have seen it being used). As it has been a racket which has been out for a few years, more of the international players have switched over to other rackets notebly the arcsabre series.

    A good allround racket, have a look at dinkalots racket review, gives u a good idea about the racket..

  3. #190
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Rotterdam/Netherlands
    Posts
    39
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i think you mean lars paaske

  4. #191
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    england
    Posts
    75
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    maybe....i'm sure i've seen cai yun using it at one point...but like i said, many people have changed over to the newer ranges

  5. #192
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    733
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The AT900T is a great racket, very versatile because at 22-24lbs it's a very forgiving intermediate players' racket with good power and great touch, and at higher tensions it serves some of the world's best equally as well.

    Not too many high end rackets can claim that IMHO.

    The T is a fantastic racket.

  6. #193
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    515
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    thanks guys for all the opinions and feedback. going to get one soon to add to my collection.

    just wish the price wasnt as if it just came out this year!

  7. #194
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    733
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Hey, I'm in Melbs too adonis. Couple of things to remember - Stadium will sell at their eBay prices if you walk into their shop and ask for them, otherwise you'll get straight retail which is a bit more. Also, James at Calibre in Sydney has good prices on rackets and is worth a look. Should cost you about 245 strung. Mine is at about 22lbs and although people around here would swear you'd need at least 26+, that's ******** unless you're an advanced player. Under 24lbs and you'll have good power AND control.

    Don't be surprised by the 900T's head heaviness - I can make reflexive defence shots with this thing better than I can my ArcSaber Z-Slash.

  8. #195
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    515
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Easy Tiger View Post
    Hey, I'm in Melbs too adonis. Couple of things to remember - Stadium will sell at their eBay prices if you walk into their shop and ask for them, otherwise you'll get straight retail which is a bit more. Also, James at Calibre in Sydney has good prices on rackets and is worth a look. Should cost you about 245 strung. Mine is at about 22lbs and although people around here would swear you'd need at least 26+, that's ******** unless you're an advanced player. Under 24lbs and you'll have good power AND control.

    Don't be surprised by the 900T's head heaviness - I can make reflexive defence shots with this thing better than I can my ArcSaber Z-Slash.
    Thanks bro for your info. I do know Stadium, have bought few things from them.. only through eBay of course! I live near that are so pick up saves that little bit!
    Have just ordered mine, strung at 25lbs. Hope that's good enough!

    HAHA seems we're quite similar, after I get my AT900T, we'll both have the same two rackets!

  9. #196
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    733
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Sweet. I hope I can get my ZS sorted out, because when you take it out of the bag people go 'oooooooh'.

    900T is a bit more anonymous.

    Oh, and go with white BG80's - Stadium does the neon yellow as standard. I learned the hard way. White = hawt / neon = not so hawt.
    Last edited by Easy Tiger; 10-12-2009 at 04:49 AM.

  10. #197
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    79
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Strung my AT900T(3UG5) recently with red Nanogy98 at 26/27lbs. Somehow, it felt hollow and lacks power during play. Can anyone share why this 'hollow' feeling comes around? Before this i strung it with BG68Ti(25/26lbs) without any problem.

  11. #198
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    733
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    So, go back to the BG68Ti.

    I don't like the Nanogy series strings at all. I have a Head strung with them and I think they completely lack feel, and yeah, the Head feels 'hollow' too.

    It can't be the 900T because strung with BG80, it's solid.

  12. #199
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    515
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    eh but everybody says the nanogy98 has good power as well as control? i have yet to try it though.

    what do you think of the bg85? for at900t

  13. #200
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    79
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yea, thats what im thinkin of Nanogy98. Its supposed to be the best 0.66 string right now, in terms of power and feel. But this doesn't feel good to me, wrong combination i guess!!
    Tiger, what d tension of BG80 on your AT900T? Solid in terms of power and control?

  14. #201
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    733
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    It was badly strung at 24lbs and is now sub 22 I reckon. Touch is great but after going on a smashfest with the ZS, it lacks power, bigtime. When I get a chance I'll restring it with probably Zymax 67 at 24lbs and I reckon it will be good.

    You can get it at stringersworld.com where I get all my strings from.

  15. #202
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    515
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    tiger, so you're overall happy with the bg80? have you tried it with the bg85?

    do you string your rackets yourelf?

  16. #203
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    79
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Bro, i find bg85 a little lack of repulsion when i test it out on AT900T. On the packing, it states 'Hard Feeling', and its really hard. And i guess you really need strong wrist to play with it. Just my opinion!

  17. #204
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    jakarta
    Posts
    130
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    U need To use your wrist when using bg 85 cause the typical string is for wristy player , tactical player or deceptive player.

    But according Japan Yonex Catalog the best string for AT 900 T is Nanogy 98

Page 12 of 17 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. FS: Armortec 900 Technique / Armortec 900 Power and Nanospeed 9900
    By miragitsu in forum Buy & Sell - Read the rules sticky before you post
    Replies: 15
    : 08-26-2011, 03:28 AM
  2. FS: Armortec 800 Defence and Armortec 900 Technique Brand new, (GTA)
    By Jason08Leafs in forum Buy & Sell - Read the rules sticky before you post
    Replies: 1
    : 08-29-2010, 12:47 PM
  3. armortec 900 power?armortec 900 technique?or armortec 700?
    By marckevin20 in forum Racket Recommendation / Comparison
    Replies: 88
    : 08-27-2008, 04:17 AM
  4. Armortec 900 Technique VS Armortec 800 Defense
    By kristian in forum Racket Recommendation / Comparison
    Replies: 14
    : 11-13-2007, 12:27 PM
  5. which is more powerful? armortec 700 or armortec 900 technique? need help. :) thanks!
    By marckevin20 in forum Racket Recommendation / Comparison
    Replies: 4
    : 06-14-2007, 11:27 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •