Results 239 to 255 of 287
Thread: Armortec 900 Technique
10-28-2009, 08:34 AM #239
My AT900T SP 3UG5
Just some photo shoot of it. Enjoy
10-28-2009, 09:43 PM #240
And the code on the cone, the last two alphabet is the country code as well, i.e SP, IP, CH, TW, etc.
Please use the search function and have a good read about this. There is WAY TOO MANY post to explain this already.
10-28-2009, 10:01 PM #241
Nice pic...but I prefer white string + white grip whith my baby
10-28-2009, 11:25 PM #242
10-28-2009, 11:41 PM #243
I'm tempted by the new Ashaway Zymax 67 in 'platinum'.
10-29-2009, 04:56 AM #244
wah..i will see a JP Badminton Bag on Saturday then...
Last edited by Licin; 10-29-2009 at 04:59 AM.
10-29-2009, 05:50 AM #245
10-29-2009, 06:22 AM #246
hahahaha... ok2.. C u tonight bro...
11-03-2009, 02:19 AM #247
Armortec 900 Technique or Armortec 700?
Does the Armortec 900 Technique have more power or less than the Amortec 700? What's the difference between control, power, and feel between the two rackets. If someone can give me some info before purchasing one that would be great. Thanks!
11-03-2009, 02:51 AM #248
Simple. If you want a well rounded racket that's very forgiving yet still has that head heavy punch, that is as good in doubles as it is singles, get the 900T.
If you're a singles orientated power-layer, or particularly strong, get the 700.
Or something like that.
No wait, just get the better looking one.
11-03-2009, 02:53 AM #249
well said tiger.
in player terms, if you like Lin Dan's style of play choose the AT700, if you life Taufik's style go with the AT900T.
11-03-2009, 03:04 AM #250
11-16-2009, 04:53 PM #251
How was your experience with the Armortec 900 Technique?
Can anyone give me some information about the AT900T? How did it felt in terms of control, power, defense, and etc? Was it good at the net, smashing, clears and backhands? Head heavy or head light? I'm planning to get this racket but I want to know a little about it before I happen to purchase it. Thank you all!
11-16-2009, 05:11 PM #252
Okay, because I love repeating info that's already available.....
The AT900T is a great racket if you like head heavy rackets. If you don't, you're better of with an ArcSaber or Nanospeed. Probably the weirdest part I find about it, is that it feels slower than an even balanced racket, until you find yourself pulling off some outrageous returns and net shots. I also like the forgiving nature of the racket, especially when you're playing like a gimp or are a bit tired. It's got a big sweetspot which means you don't have to be a pro to get good shots out of it.
I think it's one of the best all-rounder head-heavy rackets, and it doesn't hurt that it looks sharp either.
Get the 900T if you delight in winning a point through out manoeuvering your opponents, get the 900P if you can't help but smash anything that goes over your head
Last edited by Easy Tiger; 11-16-2009 at 05:18 PM.
11-20-2009, 08:47 PM #253
but the at900t is stiff. does it suitable for an average player like me. with slow swings
11-21-2009, 01:01 AM #254
The shaft is stiff but that's only one part of the rebound equation. As long as you don't string it too high, you'll be fine.
11-30-2009, 08:34 AM #255
Is AT900T to much of the racket for a player which is not so strong in arm and wrist?
Is it a racket which is hard to handle?
I'm not a pro and am I not a beginner.
By miragitsu in forum Buy & Sell - Read the rules sticky before you postReplies: 15: 08-26-2011, 04:28 AM
By Jason08Leafs in forum Buy & Sell - Read the rules sticky before you postReplies: 1: 08-29-2010, 01:47 PM
By marckevin20 in forum Racket Recommendation / ComparisonReplies: 88: 08-27-2008, 05:17 AM
By kristian in forum Racket Recommendation / ComparisonReplies: 14: 11-13-2007, 01:27 PM
By marckevin20 in forum Racket Recommendation / ComparisonReplies: 4: 06-14-2007, 12:27 PM