User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 17 of 28
  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    60
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Victor Power Waves 12 or Victor Super Nano 5

    Which one is better, or is there a better Victor?
    thanks

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    140
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    That's completely up to the player.

    The Power Waves 12 is currently one of Victor's top of the line rackets, and is overrall a heavy offensive racket. It is the more expensive of the two.

    The Super Nano 5 is an offensive all-around racket. The swing speed is much faster IMO.

    Currently, I can tell you that the Super Nano 5 is one of the more popular rackets at the shop, but that could be due to price, differing player preferences, etc etc. Best way to find out for yourself is to demo them.

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    vancouver
    Posts
    670
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Why don't you also consider the Superwaves 31 or 32 also...

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    330
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Omegamiko View Post
    The Super Nano 5 is an offensive all-around racket. The swing speed is much faster IMO.
    Was very impressed by the power of Nano 5 when I saw Thai player Suket jumpsmash with this racket during the Singapore Open. When I tested my friend's Nano 5, i could not get used to it. I guess its the player, not the racket

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    179
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Power Wave 11 and 12 is head heavy
    SuperWave 32 and 31 is more like head light
    Super Nano 5 is heavier than PW 12 and more flexible.

  6. #6
    Regular Member DinkAlot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    dcbadminton.net
    Posts
    12,238
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The PW12 is not head heavy nor is it a heavy offensive racket. It's more of a balanced to moderately head heavy, all-around racket that's good in all aspects. But it's no hammer.

    Also, it's on the stiff side but not extremely stiff.

  7. #7
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    philippines
    Posts
    458
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    for the person who started this thread... please state you body size and height... it was a factor in Dink's comment... lol

  8. #8
    Regular Member DinkAlot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    dcbadminton.net
    Posts
    12,238
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bic33 View Post
    for the person who started this thread... please state you body size and height... it was a factor in Dink's comment... lol
    It does not have anything to do with body size and height.

    I purchase nine PW12s. They were all between 85.5-87.5 grams. Compared to all the other rackets I have tested, they are of average weight and balance.

    If you compare the PW12 to 5U headlight rackets, then OK, the PW12 is a hammer.

  9. #9
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    140
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The PW12 is no hammer maybe, but it is definitely not exactly effortless to swing. It has quite a bit of swing-weight burden for the average.

  10. #10
    Regular Member DinkAlot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    dcbadminton.net
    Posts
    12,238
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Omegamiko View Post
    The PW12 is no hammer maybe, but it is definitely not exactly effortless to swing. It has quite a bit of swing-weight burden for the average.
    Are you talking 2U or 3U? Because the 3U ones I had were average to swing compared to all the similar 3U rackets that I have tried. The only thing that makes the PW12 in 3U more demanding is, it's above average stiffness.

  11. #11
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    140
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Both of them are quite stiff, and the Victor box-shape cut frame, while providing facial stability, gives it more-than-normal air resistance compared to other offensive rackets like the Yonex Ti-10, which is on average heavier, but (IMO) has a faster and less demanding swing speed and swing weight.

  12. #12
    Regular Member DinkAlot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    dcbadminton.net
    Posts
    12,238
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Omegamiko View Post
    Both of them are quite stiff, and the Victor box-shape cut frame, while providing facial stability, gives it more-than-normal air resistance compared to other offensive rackets like the Yonex Ti-10, which is on average heavier, but (IMO) has a faster and less demanding swing speed and swing weight.
    Have you even tried the PW12?

    The Ti-10 in 3U (forget 2U) is noticeably more demanding than the PW12.

    But to each his own.

  13. #13
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    140
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yes, the shop I work at is a local Victor Dealership, I use both the PW 11 and PW 12 regularly. The 3U Ti10, is much faster to swing down, although it is quite difficult to generally maneuver, whereas both the PW's seem to have a lot of air resistance, making them overall rather difficult to swing. That's not just my opinion either, I hear a lot of the same comments from the local club players, and either they're all very spoiled by Yonex rackets, or just not many people find the rackets easy to get used to.

    The Super Nanos on the other hand are quite easily well liked rackets here. They feel more natural. Despite the Power Waves being the new series here in the states (the Super Waves have not been imported yet, although we're waiting on them) I regret to say that they are noticeably less popular.

  14. #14
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    586
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I like PW12. The feeling is quite good though is quite stiff to my liking but compare to my other racket. It still pack a punch.

  15. #15
    Regular Member DinkAlot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    dcbadminton.net
    Posts
    12,238
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Again, we have a difference in experience. I find the PW12 easier to swing and maneuver than the Ti10 as do 3-4 local players (that I know) that own the racket. These players range from Level D+ to B. Their power is between average to good.

    Thanks for the info on the SW rackets, I've been wondering about them.


    Quote Originally Posted by Omegamiko View Post
    Yes, the shop I work at is a local Victor Dealership, I use both the PW 11 and PW 12 regularly. The 3U Ti10, is much faster to swing down, although it is quite difficult to generally maneuver, whereas both the PW's seem to have a lot of air resistance, making them overall rather difficult to swing. That's not just my opinion either, I hear a lot of the same comments from the local club players, and either they're all very spoiled by Yonex rackets, or just not many people find the rackets easy to get used to.

    The Super Nanos on the other hand are quite easily well liked rackets here. They feel more natural. Despite the Power Waves being the new series here in the states (the Super Waves have not been imported yet, although we're waiting on them) I regret to say that they are noticeably less popular.

  16. #16
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    140
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    You didn't hear this from me, but yeah we hope they will arrive by September But the distribution center is often slow on the new stuff so keep your fingers crossed.

  17. #17
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    vancouver
    Posts
    670
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Hmmm... maybe I should give my superwave 31 another try than....

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. FS/FT: VICTOR Super Waves 33 Power - MINT
    By Boaster in forum Buy & Sell - Read the rules sticky before you post
    Replies: 0
    : 01-17-2011, 02:12 PM
  2. Victor Super Nano Series / Power Waves
    By cl427x in forum Racket Recommendation / Comparison
    Replies: 0
    : 11-04-2010, 10:36 PM
  3. FS: Victor Power Waves 11 & Super Waves 31
    By cappius in forum Buy & Sell - Read the rules sticky before you post
    Replies: 0
    : 08-24-2008, 08:20 PM
  4. Victor Power Waves and Super Nanos
    By GT0ro in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 19
    : 03-24-2008, 02:24 PM
  5. Anybody tried victor super waves 32or power wave12?
    By coldcomfort in forum Racket Recommendation / Comparison
    Replies: 0
    : 08-05-2007, 08:35 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •