Results 1 to 17 of 28
08-17-2007, 06:15 PM #1
Victor Power Waves 12 or Victor Super Nano 5
Which one is better, or is there a better Victor?
08-17-2007, 06:34 PM #2
That's completely up to the player.
The Power Waves 12 is currently one of Victor's top of the line rackets, and is overrall a heavy offensive racket. It is the more expensive of the two.
The Super Nano 5 is an offensive all-around racket. The swing speed is much faster IMO.
Currently, I can tell you that the Super Nano 5 is one of the more popular rackets at the shop, but that could be due to price, differing player preferences, etc etc. Best way to find out for yourself is to demo them.
08-17-2007, 08:00 PM #3
Why don't you also consider the Superwaves 31 or 32 also...
08-18-2007, 12:35 PM #4
08-19-2007, 10:32 PM #5
Power Wave 11 and 12 is head heavy
SuperWave 32 and 31 is more like head light
Super Nano 5 is heavier than PW 12 and more flexible.
08-19-2007, 10:57 PM #6
The PW12 is not head heavy nor is it a heavy offensive racket. It's more of a balanced to moderately head heavy, all-around racket that's good in all aspects. But it's no hammer.
Also, it's on the stiff side but not extremely stiff.
08-19-2007, 11:39 PM #7
for the person who started this thread... please state you body size and height... it was a factor in Dink's comment... lol
08-19-2007, 11:55 PM #8
I purchase nine PW12s. They were all between 85.5-87.5 grams. Compared to all the other rackets I have tested, they are of average weight and balance.
If you compare the PW12 to 5U headlight rackets, then OK, the PW12 is a hammer.
08-20-2007, 01:30 AM #9
The PW12 is no hammer maybe, but it is definitely not exactly effortless to swing. It has quite a bit of swing-weight burden for the average.
08-20-2007, 01:36 AM #10
08-20-2007, 02:44 AM #11
Both of them are quite stiff, and the Victor box-shape cut frame, while providing facial stability, gives it more-than-normal air resistance compared to other offensive rackets like the Yonex Ti-10, which is on average heavier, but (IMO) has a faster and less demanding swing speed and swing weight.
08-20-2007, 03:30 AM #12
08-20-2007, 03:46 AM #13
Yes, the shop I work at is a local Victor Dealership, I use both the PW 11 and PW 12 regularly. The 3U Ti10, is much faster to swing down, although it is quite difficult to generally maneuver, whereas both the PW's seem to have a lot of air resistance, making them overall rather difficult to swing. That's not just my opinion either, I hear a lot of the same comments from the local club players, and either they're all very spoiled by Yonex rackets, or just not many people find the rackets easy to get used to.
The Super Nanos on the other hand are quite easily well liked rackets here. They feel more natural. Despite the Power Waves being the new series here in the states (the Super Waves have not been imported yet, although we're waiting on them) I regret to say that they are noticeably less popular.
08-20-2007, 08:28 AM #14
I like PW12. The feeling is quite good though is quite stiff to my liking but compare to my other racket. It still pack a punch.
08-20-2007, 09:57 AM #15
Again, we have a difference in experience. I find the PW12 easier to swing and maneuver than the Ti10 as do 3-4 local players (that I know) that own the racket. These players range from Level D+ to B. Their power is between average to good.
Thanks for the info on the SW rackets, I've been wondering about them.
08-20-2007, 12:27 PM #16
You didn't hear this from me, but yeah we hope they will arrive by September But the distribution center is often slow on the new stuff so keep your fingers crossed.
08-20-2007, 03:53 PM #17
Hmmm... maybe I should give my superwave 31 another try than....
By Boaster in forum Buy & SellReplies: 0: 01-17-2011, 02:12 PM
By cl427x in forum Racket Recommendation / ComparisonReplies: 0: 11-04-2010, 10:36 PM
By cappius in forum Buy & SellReplies: 0: 08-24-2008, 08:20 PM
By GT0ro in forum Badminton Rackets / EquipmentReplies: 19: 03-24-2008, 02:24 PM
By coldcomfort in forum Racket Recommendation / ComparisonReplies: 0: 08-05-2007, 08:35 AM