User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 17 of 27
  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    3,657
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Box vs Aero frame

    How is it that a box frame has more power than an aero frame? i thought it would be the other way around because the aero frame would cut through the air easier.

  2. #2
    Regular Member jhirata's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand, New Z
    Posts
    2,488
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I dont think that the shape of the framewill make much of a difference in the swinging speed, but I'm quite sure that the box-shaped ( isometric ) will actually provide more power and control, as the sweet-spot is larger.
    The weight of the racquet, the stiffness of the shaft, and the string tension will affect the repulsion power too, i think.

  3. #3
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    35,948
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jhirata View Post
    I dont think that the shape of the framewill make much of a difference in the swinging speed, but I'm quite sure that the box-shaped ( isometric ) will actually provide more power and control, as the sweet-spot is larger.
    box vs. aero has nothing to do with isometric vs. oval.

    box/aero refers to the cross section of the frame. not the overall shape.

    box frames are stronger and stiffer than aero frame, which makes racket stiffer and thus allow for more power transfer when the player is powerful enough.

  4. #4
    Moderator drifit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Selangor, Malaysia
    Posts
    6,428
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kwun View Post
    box vs. aero has nothing to do with isometric vs. oval.

    box/aero refers to the cross section of the frame. not the overall shape.

    box frames are stronger and stiffer than aero frame, which makes racket stiffer and thus allow for more power transfer when the player is powerful enough.
    yeah..... yeah....
    refer to this www.yonex.com/badminton/technology/racquets.html
    check out the power armor system and delta power frame
    more easy to compare are Yonex At800OFF and At800Def. Offensive type is more to box shape for power(stable) and Defensive type is more to speed(to defend). errr.... correct arr?

  5. #5
    New Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    sydney, australia
    Posts
    84
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    box frames make a very lovely sound when clearing or smashing. =)
    aero just feels nice on the swing but feels terrible when it impacts shuttle. )=

    is the at900t aero or box???? ppl say it's aero but all other AT racquets have box frames.

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Bay area
    Posts
    25
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by haifeng7 View Post
    box frames make a very lovely sound when clearing or smashing. =)
    aero just feels nice on the swing but feels terrible when it impacts shuttle. )=

    is the at900t aero or box???? ppl say it's aero but all other AT racquets have box frames.
    900t is aero
    900p is box

  7. #7
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    3,989
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    It was a very close contest between box and aero in the Japan open Mens single finals

    /Twobeer

  8. #8
    Regular Member Blurry D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Singapore, Yishun
    Posts
    1,810
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by twobeer View Post
    It was a very close contest between box and aero in the Japan open Mens single finals

    /Twobeer
    Hahah yea it seems the box won..heheh but i would like the aero to win....i dont mean the player but the racket.. ehhe

  9. #9
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    3,657
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    since the 9000NS is aero would that mean AT900P is more powerful?

  10. #10
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Lion City
    Posts
    555
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    have to consider racket stiffness as well.

  11. #11
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Manila
    Posts
    84
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    There are too many variables being tossed about...

    I think the correct question would be:
    All other things kept the same (material, string tension, racket stiffness and whatnot), what are the advantages/disadvatages of a box-section frame and an aero-section frame?

  12. #12
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    6,527
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    There are more cross-section types than just box and aero. However, between box and aero, the box has advantages in low costs (you can use very cheap materials because of the box's stronger structural design), more power but it is slow, sometimes very slow because of strong air resistance. AOTBE the aero is less strong but it has less air resistance and is therefor faster. However, the use of good and expensive materials, e.g. Yonex Swingpower 900 SP, can make an aero both strong and fast.
    As a matter of fact it is possible to make a respectable box shaped cross-section racquet for US$10. Not possible with a good aero design.

  13. #13
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    35,948
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by taneepak View Post
    However, the use of good and expensive materials, e.g. Yonex Swingpower 900 SP, can make an aero both strong and fast.
    just to clarify, the Swingpower 900 is neither aero, nor strong...

  14. #14
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    6,302
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    The Swingpower 900 pops easily but it's a very nice racquet nonetheless.

  15. #15
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    6,527
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kwun View Post
    just to clarify, the Swingpower 900 is neither aero, nor strong...
    True the Swingpower is not strictly of the original aero shape but it is a slim design and closer to the aero than the box. However, the Swingpower's materials are a high grade ultra high modulus graphite which is an extremely strong and stiff material that resist twisting better than other materials, which is necessary for a good iso racquet. It is however brittle against impact clashes against other racquets. If you want extremely strong impact-resistant racquets then Kevlar racquets are quite unbreakable.

  16. #16
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    35,948
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by taneepak View Post
    True the Swingpower is not strictly of the original aero shape but it is a slim design and closer to the aero than the box. However, the Swingpower's materials are a high grade ultra high modulus graphite which is an extremely strong and stiff material that resist twisting better than other materials, which is necessary for a good iso racquet.
    whatever they call it, it is not aero, and it is not strong.

  17. #17
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    6,527
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    A racquet with high grade ultra high modulus graphite will resist the enormous twisting forces of power shots much better than a high modulus graphite racquet. But being more brittle because of its higher stiffness, UHMG will have less impact resistance than HMG and will not fare as well in a racquet clash. A steel racquet may be unbreakable in a racquet clash but it will perform poorly handling the enormous twisting forces of power shots.
    My comments about the Swingpower being strong is from its strong resistance against the enormous twisting forces a racquet encounters during play. From a racquet clash impact point of view a steel racquet will probably be stronger than almost all modern high grade racquets, but it performs poorly. Would you call a steel racquet a strong racquet?

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Thin Frame vs Thick Frame
    By bmtfreak123 in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 11
    : 04-04-2012, 01:34 PM
  2. Oversized Frame vs Isometric Frame - Pros & Cons
    By shinn in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 2
    : 08-01-2011, 11:20 AM
  3. Box vs Aero frame
    By joedc in forum Racket Recommendation / Comparison
    Replies: 3
    : 11-10-2009, 11:09 AM
  4. Definition : aerodynamic frame and box frame
    By niemrieng in forum Racket Recommendation / Comparison
    Replies: 2
    : 11-05-2009, 10:37 PM
  5. experience the new 'APACS NANO 900 POWER' (aero frame)
    By impact1984 in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 3
    : 10-08-2007, 05:54 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •